I like that we are getting a phaeton variant. Let’s be real hear the falcon would have been worthless in warzone. They would be sitting ducks. Players won’t even get in oni hogs in warzone as is. More times than not I have to gun my own oni hogs. Sure maybe they can add in the hornet that would work and be better than the falcon. But I love flying the phaeton so now I may have a better chance at getting it in packs since there is two of them. 343s biggest mistake is naming these updates. They should have just said monthly updates so then players wouldn’t have gotten their hopes all up on what would be in them.
“I’m happy with a Phaeton variant.”
—Nobody, ever.
Seriously now, are we even get to use it? Because the amount of Phaetons I’ve seen controlled by a player in any kind of match of WarZone is amazingly low; I almost forgot we even had the Phaeton to obtain through REQ cards. I don’t see the point of adding a new vehicle variant we won’t even get to use.
> 2533274812698627;2:
> “I’m happy with a Phaeton variant.”
> —Nobody, ever.
>
> Seriously now, are we even get to use it? Because the amount of Phaetons I’ve seen controlled by a player in any kind of match of WarZone is amazingly low; I almost forgot we even had the Phaeton to obtain through REQ cards. I don’t see the point of adding a new vehicle variant we won’t even get to use.
I get phaetons quite often actually. I recently got two of them in my forerunner destroyer pack. I have gotten them three time using the ultra rare vehicle req cards. Phaetons are rare but I do get them and yes phaetons > falcons.
> 2533274816788253;3:
> > 2533274812698627;2:
> > “I’m happy with a Phaeton variant.”
> > —Nobody, ever.
> >
> > Seriously now, are we even get to use it? Because the amount of Phaetons I’ve seen controlled by a player in any kind of match of WarZone is amazingly low; I almost forgot we even had the Phaeton to obtain through REQ cards. I don’t see the point of adding a new vehicle variant we won’t even get to use.
>
>
> I get phaetons quite often actually. I recently got two of them in my forerunner destroyer pack. I have gotten them three time using the ultra rare vehicle req cards. Phaetons are rare but I do get them and yes phaetons > falcons.
Although I see your point, I think he means that getting the cert for it is going to be near impossible for a player that dosn’t grind or pay money.
> 2533274816788253;3:
> > 2533274812698627;2:
> > “I’m happy with a Phaeton variant.”
> > —Nobody, ever.
> >
> > Seriously now, are we even get to use it? Because the amount of Phaetons I’ve seen controlled by a player in any kind of match of WarZone is amazingly low; I almost forgot we even had the Phaeton to obtain through REQ cards. I don’t see the point of adding a new vehicle variant we won’t even get to use.
>
>
> I get phaetons quite often actually. I recently got two of them in my forerunner destroyer pack. I have gotten them three time using the ultra rare vehicle req cards. Phaetons are rare but I do get them and yes phaetons > falcons.
You are a small, small minority, I can promise you that. This update would have benefited from way less rares to legendaries. Benefited even more from an uncommon or rare Falcon. Though, I knew they weren’t going to add one.
> 2626429604138871;5:
> > 2533274816788253;3:
> > > 2533274812698627;2:
> > > “I’m happy with a Phaeton variant.”
> > > —Nobody, ever.
> > >
> > > Seriously now, are we even get to use it? Because the amount of Phaetons I’ve seen controlled by a player in any kind of match of WarZone is amazingly low; I almost forgot we even had the Phaeton to obtain through REQ cards. I don’t see the point of adding a new vehicle variant we won’t even get to use.
> >
> >
> > I get phaetons quite often actually. I recently got two of them in my forerunner destroyer pack. I have gotten them three time using the ultra rare vehicle req cards. Phaetons are rare but I do get them and yes phaetons > falcons.
>
>
> You are a small, small minority, I can promise you that. This update would have benefited from way less rares to legendaries. Benefited even more from an uncommon or rare Falcon. Though, I knew they weren’t going to add one.
And I guarantee you I am not a small minority in which hardly no one guns for any one any ways. No one would gun for a falcon because hardly any one guns for warthogs.
Players would be like why did we get this falcon no guns for it ever.
> 2533274816788253;6:
> > 2626429604138871;5:
> > > 2533274816788253;3:
> > > > 2533274812698627;2:
> > > > “I’m happy with a Phaeton variant.”
> > > > —Nobody, ever.
> > > >
> > > > Seriously now, are we even get to use it? Because the amount of Phaetons I’ve seen controlled by a player in any kind of match of WarZone is amazingly low; I almost forgot we even had the Phaeton to obtain through REQ cards. I don’t see the point of adding a new vehicle variant we won’t even get to use.
> > >
> > >
> > > I get phaetons quite often actually. I recently got two of them in my forerunner destroyer pack. I have gotten them three time using the ultra rare vehicle req cards. Phaetons are rare but I do get them and yes phaetons > falcons.
> >
> >
> > You are a small, small minority, I can promise you that. This update would have benefited from way less rares to legendaries. Benefited even more from an uncommon or rare Falcon. Though, I knew they weren’t going to add one.
>
>
> And I guarantee you I am not a small minority in which hardly no one guns for any one any ways. No one would gun for a falcon because hardly any one guns for warthogs.
I see people gunning on warthogs 20-30 times more often than I see phaetons in play. If the falcon was uncommon and 6 req, we would see that much more than a legendary 8 req. That means more falcons in play, which equals a substantially higher chance for gunners in falcons than phaetons being played. It’s simply not debatable.
yea i need more pheatons badly
> 2626429604138871;8:
> > 2533274816788253;6:
> > > 2626429604138871;5:
> > > > 2533274816788253;3:
> > > > > 2533274812698627;2:
> > > > > “I’m happy with a Phaeton variant.”
> > > > > —Nobody, ever.
> > > > >
> > > > > Seriously now, are we even get to use it? Because the amount of Phaetons I’ve seen controlled by a player in any kind of match of WarZone is amazingly low; I almost forgot we even had the Phaeton to obtain through REQ cards. I don’t see the point of adding a new vehicle variant we won’t even get to use.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I get phaetons quite often actually. I recently got two of them in my forerunner destroyer pack. I have gotten them three time using the ultra rare vehicle req cards. Phaetons are rare but I do get them and yes phaetons > falcons.
> > >
> > >
> > > You are a small, small minority, I can promise you that. This update would have benefited from way less rares to legendaries. Benefited even more from an uncommon or rare Falcon. Though, I knew they weren’t going to add one.
> >
> >
> > And I guarantee you I am not a small minority in which hardly no one guns for any one any ways. No one would gun for a falcon because hardly any one guns for warthogs.
>
>
> I see people gunning on warthogs 20-30 times more often than I see phaetons in play. If the falcon was uncommon and 6 req, we would see that much more than a legendary 8 req. That means more falcons in play, which equals a substantially higher chance for gunners in falcons than phaetons being played. It’s simply not debatable.
Of course something with a lower req will be in play more often. The oni hog is only a req level 3 and it’s a pain trying to get people to gun for it. So getting some on to gun for a falcon would be just as bad if not worse. Falcons would be lasered in no time. Yes I would like to see a unsc flying vehicle in H5. I would rather it be the hornet. Then i wouldn’t have to rely on hoping some one guns for me.