People expecting realism from a video game are naive
That is your opinion, like 1
Fine, pay $60 for the same game all your life, see if we care.
Also, the fact that you are using homosexuality as an insult to a video game that shows no side on the subject is stupid.
P.S. We don’t care if you regret nothing, it’s ok a Mod won’t regret locking this thread.
hey guess what, Cod sales for advanced fwarfare are tracking at 50% lower than Ghosts.
So… Cod is dying, before Halo… despite halo being older.
So, enjoy.
Everyone who is raging at the OP, you are clearly blind.
He is obviously using satire and being sarcastic with his post, he is trying to point out that dumb people think this way (ie.thinking that CoD is better than Halo because it came out first, when it actually didnt’). I’m sure the guy who made the opening post isn’t that dumb and is just immitating them, seriously.
I wish more people understood how badly Bungie ripped off IW…
It’s like when people try to tell me Wolfenstein and Doom paved the way for the genre’s success. I always explain to them how I used to play CoD: Pre-Warfare back in '89 before it was mainstream, but they won’t listen to me.
This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not engage users who are trolling.
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
So that is why CoD is dying and the recent games have had lower and lower sales with more and more people not playing it? And you really think Ghosts is good? Hahaha don’t make us laugh boy. CoD is a kid’s game while Halo is a man’s game, now run along it’s past your bed time.
> > 2. CoD came out before Halo
>
> Everyone who is raging at the OP, you are clearly blind.
>
> He is obviously using satire and being sarcastic with his post, he is trying to point out that dumb people think this way (ie.thinking that CoD is better than Halo because it came out first, when it actually didnt’). I’m sure the guy who made the opening post isn’t that dumb and is just immitating them, seriously.
>
> The other posibility is that he is trolling.
>
> But either way, what he is saying is not serious.
I think so too. Nobody who spells at least as well as OP is would actually believe the silly things he has said. Y’all are being trolled.
Still, I do think he should’ve added the /s tag at the end of his post.
On another thread, the creator of this thread said this:
> Almost every day we see a new sprint thread about saying sprint is bad or sprint is good and it’s really starting to get on my nerves. So we have a BETA of Halo 5 for the ARENA side of Halo which is good for Halo competitive side of Halo right? So how about the Arena side has no sprint so the competitive side of Halo and the Social has sprint. Now I know that idea has a 1/10 of a chance in making it in Halo 5:G and most likely the social side would not have sprint either, so I only hope sprint will be in Campaign, Firefight, and Custom Games (Halo 3 action machinima’s were lame without sprint, Reach’s were better).
This proves 3 things.
He knows a fair amount about Halo and has owned several games
He is interested in getting Halo 5 gaurdians.
He is probably a Halo fan, and given the armor he has in his profile picture
he has been playing multiplayer for a good while.
Why would a Halo fan say that CoD is better than it, and list the dumbest reasons ever? To be sarcastic and use satire. He is making fun of people who actually believe that CoD is better than Halo for the dumb reasons listed.
Or he could be trolling for fun.
Either way, this is proof that this thread is not a serious thread.
More proof, proof that the thread maker doesn’t like CoD:
> > -Get rid of flinch
> > -Get rid of personal ordinance drops
> > -Get rid of Armor Abilities
> > -Get rid of loadouts
> > -Get rid of perks
> > -Get rid of sprint
>
> That is still CoD, because CoD doesn’t change.
> > 2. CoD came out before Halo
>
> Everyone who is raging at the OP, you are clearly blind.
>
> He is obviously using satire and being sarcastic with his post, he is trying to point out that dumb people think this way (ie.thinking that CoD is better than Halo because it came out first, when it actually didnt’). I’m sure the guy who made the opening post isn’t that dumb and is just immitating them, seriously.
>
> The other posibility is that he is trolling.
>
> But either way, what he is saying is not serious.
I think it’s possible that you’re giving the OP too much credit. Although that is quite a horrifying thought.