1-50 ranking (of course no loosing ranks if you loose a match) Better campaign story. Better maps, better forge.
What? Campaign was fantastic. Forge was incredible and the Customs were the best yet. As for 1-50… I couldn’t care less. I have fun regardless.
And don’t make it out that your opinions are fact. They are, in fact, not.
1-50. No bloom. BR still in there. Good maps. Balanced gametypes. No AA’s. Oh wait, that’s everybodies dream for H4 that just got ruined as well.
*Campaign/FF in Reach were cool.
Reach was a success, IMO
So true OP, so true.
> What? Campaign was fantastic. Forge was incredible and the Customs were the best yet. As for 1-50… I couldn’t care less. I have fun regardless.
Campaign was pretty standard for a Halo game, Forge had good options but ultimately every creation is grey and bland, and there was negligible differences in “Custom games” from Halo 3.
> And don’t make it out that your opinions are fact. They are, in fact, not.
Love hypocrites these days. “Campaign was fantastic. Forge was incredible and the Customs were the best yet.” = Your Opinion
> So true OP, so true.
>
>
>
> > What? Campaign was fantastic. Forge was incredible and the Customs were the best yet. As for 1-50… I couldn’t care less. I have fun regardless.
>
> Campaign was pretty standard for a Halo game, Forge had good options but ultimately every creation is grey and bland, and there was negligible differences in “Custom games” from Halo 3.
>
>
>
>
> > And don’t make it out that your opinions are fact. They are, in fact, not.
>
> Love hypocrites these days. “Campaign was fantastic. <mark>Forge was incredible and the Customs were the best yet.” = Your Opinion[/h]
[/quote]
Yes, that’s my opinion. I don’t speak for everyone when I say this.</mark>
Judging by sales figures alone, Reach is a success. You can’t really call a game successful or not just because it doesn’t feature a Skill level ranking system, it all comes down to the amount of product shifted.
> 1-50 ranking (of course no loosing ranks if you loose a match) Better campaign story. Better maps, better forge.
I sorta agree with you on the ranking. It should have been 1-50, but you still need to be able to go down in rank if you lose. That is why it was so important to win.
Better maps: agree
Better campaign story: agree
Better forge: agree. Forge World had a lot of potential and customization, but because it is so bad for split-screen, it was a step down from Halo 3’s forge IMO.
Reach is a phenomenal success in almost every single aspect, you can count on two hands, the games that were more successful and Reach.
There is not a developer out there that would not want the sales, population, longevity and technical achievement Reach has produced.
In my opinion, the Campaign and Forge for Halo Reach was pretty good. I agree with you that we could have some better maps. I also agree with you about having the ranking system of 1 - 50, except for the part where if you lose your rank doesn’t go down. Isn’t that the whole point of a ranked match/playlist?
Reach definitely had the most potential of any Halo game released so far. If it had a 1-50 ranking system, no bloom, proper bleedthrough, maps that weren’t from the campaign, and properly balanced AA’s, Reach would have been the best Halo yet.
You can’t even spell lose 
So the key to success was to make it a carbon copy of Halo 3?
For still being among the top 10 most played Xbox Live games, even after two years, I’d say it’s a success.
What you mean to say is, if Reach had been even better than it was, it would have been even more of a success.
That’s practically a tautology bro.
> 1-50 ranking (of course no loosing ranks if you loose a match) Better campaign story. Better maps, better forge.
Yes, to everything you’ve said, plus this:
Better community maps/minigames in action sack.
Race playlist with community maps.
Vanilla playlists for everything (reach in other words, not this TrashU BS.
Custom games browser.
More fair living dead scoring and better maps.
> 1-50. No bloom. BR still in there. Good maps. Balanced gametypes. No AA’s. Oh wait, that’s everybodies dream for H4 that just got ruined as well.
>
> *Campaign/FF in Reach were cool.
Oh wait, they already did that.
It’s called Halo 3.
Why are people hating on Reach? Was an amazing game, just too many people wanted to play it like Halo 3 and ended up being frustrated.
Had this game came out in the place of Halo 3? Wheeeeew, would it be a one-hit wonder
Gamers have to much to compare to is the real issue.