How is this non-constructive?!

<mark>This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not repost content a moderator has removed, repost a topic that has been locked, or post about forum moderation decisions. If you have a question or concern about a forum moderation decision, please private message the applicable moderator.</mark>
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.

Having read your post… nothing resembles an effort to being constructive.

Here is a quote you wrote:
i hope these cinematics are all just deflection till gameplay and real story comes into play. Or all I see is a catering to cry babies who didn’t put time and hard work into halo 4 and 5. Or else what was the point Bonnie Ross?! What happened to the reclaimer trilogy? Do those games matter or is this truly a hard reboot that asks players to forget your first two iterations?

You don’t provide any constructive criticism to what could be considered a problem, you’re bashing violently at 343s design choices. You come off as the most angry juvenile in that post. The post does not contribute to a discussion at all.

And at some point, this post will also get locked.

NOTE: Dont call people crybabies, it’s not gonna help create a healthy and rational discussion.

Your initial comment wasn’t constructive and seemed more like a rant, venting out whatever anger you had because your following comment was an actual idea that I, personally at least, like.

When giving constructive criticism you have look at both good and bad things they’ve done. Giving suggestions on how they could fix the bad with an idea (like you did in your second post of the thread) and look at the good things, pinpoint what makes them good and suggest how they can apply it to the bad or just improve upon what is already good

> 2533274824095836;2:
>

> 2533274857165616;3:
>

In the future, please just report this kind of thing. No comment necessary.