without ruining their image? Master chief is a mysterious character which makes him so inspiring/heroic. If this game and the new trilogy dwell too much on making him “too human”, his image can be ruined and ruin the franchise of halo as we know it, like wolverine in origins and the reapers in mass effect 3.
Read the books.
they know what they’re doing … after the vidoc you can easily get it
> they know what they’re doing … after the vidoc you can easily get it
I don’t know man, that’s what everyone thought/said about mass effect 3.
Then there was the ending.
Watch the ViDoc. He may be a mysterious character, but we still know a bit about him. He’s a soldier, a hero. But he’s also human. Just watch the ViDoc. 343 can do this.
It’s a difficult balance, for sure. However, the Master Chief’s humanity has already been explored in the books… so it wouldn’t be news to anyone who’s read them. The only difference now is that it’s being brought into the games. I’ve yet to come across anyone who felt that the Chief was ruined after reading the books, so… I’m not all that worried.
> Watch the ViDoc. He may be a mysterious character, but we still know a bit about him. He’s a soldier, a hero. But he’s also human. Just watch the ViDoc. 343 can do this.
> Read the books.
What he said. The books express chief to be more human. Hardened but still human.
I cannot understand this mindset. He’s not a character as far as I’m concerned if he doesn’t speak…
The games need to explore him more.
I love the Chief, but I’m sorry, I don’t want to play three more games about a completely stone-cold, infallible hero. At the end of the day he IS a human, and even for Chief the constant enormous pressure of the galaxy and Cortana on his shoulders has to be trying, even for him. It’s something worth exploring, I think.
I think it’s a good direction, in the books he seemed more relatable. In the games, he was more bland and almost generic in comparison.
He doesn’t have to stay a man of few words to keep who the master chief is. Hes always been a hardend solider put in tough situations. But he has his “human side” in past games expressed through cortana. In the books its easier to see his human side and like the books he will show more of his human side. Trust me better yet trust 343i.
> > they know what they’re doing … after the vidoc you can easily get it
>
> I don’t know man, that’s what everyone thought/said about mass effect 3.
>
> Then there was the ending.
I don’t understand why people use this absurd argument as a basis. Mass Effect 3 was upsetting yes, but this is not Mass Effect 3. Different game, different story, different producers, different writers, different everything, so by your argument you are going to judge your opinion BASED on a completely irrelevant video game? That’s nonsense.
> > > they know what they’re doing … after the vidoc you can easily get it
> >
> > I don’t know man, that’s what everyone thought/said about mass effect 3.
> >
> > Then there was the ending.
>
> I don’t understand why people use this absurd argument as a basis. Mass Effect 3 was upsetting yes, but this is not Mass Effect 3. Different game, different story, different producers, different writers, different everything, so by your argument you are going to judge your opinion BASED on a completely irrelevant video game? That’s nonsense.
Not to mention character development in ME1 and ME2 was excellent. ME3 was the weakest of the trilogy, but you cant blame the whole.