… i dont even want to have a complete halo 3 remake in halo 4 but 343 should simply take the main things from halo 2 and 3(almost everything/BR,jump height,movement speed,no AAs,ranking system,…) cause its a sequel to halo 3 anyways AND they should add the things they want + improve the things which had issues like h3 netcode(i had no problems with it)
the gameplay and map design should just feel like halo(halo 2 and 3 FOR ME,cause i didnt play halo 1 online and reach is crap) and then add some new things and improve the old things,that would be the perfect halo 4 for me
i think the campaign will rape everything and im sure there will be a cinema and a forge as well,im just not sure about the multiplayer and the gameplay and im really scared that it wont be like the majority wants it to be
im really NOT against changes but the changes should not be like from Halo 3 > reach,changes should be more like Halo 2 > Halo 3
what do you think?
It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
Same, I hope that they keep the core gameplay and matchmaking very similar to halo 2/3 and that they just improve upon those concepts.
> It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
firefight yes,great netcode yes,assassinations hell no,and invasion is only a gametype stolen from Battlefield(rush),but i do respect your opinion
> > It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
>
> firefight yes,great netcode yes,assassinations hell no,and invasion is only a gametype stolen from Battlefield(rush),but i do respect your opinion
Why no assassinations?
You know you can avoid doing them by not pressing the button to hard, so what is the problem with having another very good feature?
it should have the core gameplay based on Halo 3, but i would like it be more dynamic and intense
> > > It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
> >
> > firefight yes,great netcode yes,assassinations hell no,and invasion is only a gametype stolen from Battlefield(rush),but i do respect your opinion
>
> Why no assassinations?
>
> You know you can avoid doing them by not pressing the button to hard, so what is the problem with having another very good feature?
The problem is that alot of the time you don’t try to get an assassination and you accidently do, which leads to you getting killed.
> > > It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
> >
> > firefight yes,great netcode yes,assassinations hell no,and invasion is only a gametype stolen from Battlefield(rush),but i do respect your opinion
>
> Why no assassinations?
>
> You know you can avoid doing them by not pressing the button to hard, so what is the problem with having another very good feature?
Not true. I have hardly hit the button to do a back smack, but it decides to do a full animation assassation. Then I die cause someone comes yo behind me and kills me.
They can come back but I hope there’s a option in setting turn them off.
> > > > It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
> > >
> > > firefight yes,great netcode yes,assassinations hell no,and invasion is only a gametype stolen from Battlefield(rush),but i do respect your opinion
> >
> > Why no assassinations?
> >
> > You know you can avoid doing them by not pressing the button to hard, so what is the problem with having another very good feature?
>
> The problem is that alot of the time you don’t try to get an assassination and you accidently do, which leads to you getting killed.
So by that logic, remove it completely?
I kill my self with grenades quite often. 343i should remove grenades to prevent this.
That is worst reason I have ever heard to remove a feature, no offence…
Assassinations were a great feature in Reach, loved by most people, and therefore they should return.
> > > > > It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
> > > >
> > > > firefight yes,great netcode yes,assassinations hell no,and invasion is only a gametype stolen from Battlefield(rush),but i do respect your opinion
> > >
> > > Why no assassinations?
> > >
> > > You know you can avoid doing them by not pressing the button to hard, so what is the problem with having another very good feature?
> >
> > The problem is that alot of the time you don’t try to get an assassination and you accidently do, which leads to you getting killed.
>
> So by that logic, remove it completely?
>
> I kill my self with grenades quite often. 343i should remove grenades to prevent this.
>
> That is worst reason I have ever heard to remove a feature, no offence…
>
> Assassinations were a great feature in Reach, loved by most people, and therefore they should return.
Theres a difference here. You threw the grenades its your fault you died. But with assassantions. There some sort of glitch that forces your player to goes into the animation even tho you didn’t hold the button long. As I said before they can return as long as you can turn them off.
> > > > > It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
> > > >
> > > > firefight yes,great netcode yes,assassinations hell no,and invasion is only a gametype stolen from Battlefield(rush),but i do respect your opinion
> > >
> > > Why no assassinations?
> > >
> > > You know you can avoid doing them by not pressing the button to hard, so what is the problem with having another very good feature?
> >
> > The problem is that alot of the time you don’t try to get an assassination and you accidently do, which leads to you getting killed.
>
> So by that logic, remove it completely?
>
> I kill my self with grenades quite often. 343i should remove grenades to prevent this.
>
> That is worst reason I have ever heard to remove a feature, no offence…
>
> Assassinations were a great feature in Reach, loved by most people, and therefore they should return.
No I think they should not return as well because lots of people do it by mistake and its pretty dumb.
Oh maybe if they do return, make it so you have to press two buttons at the same time or something like that.
> > > > > > It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
> > > > >
> > > > > firefight yes,great netcode yes,assassinations hell no,and invasion is only a gametype stolen from Battlefield(rush),but i do respect your opinion
> > > >
> > > > Why no assassinations?
> > > >
> > > > You know you can avoid doing them by not pressing the button to hard, so what is the problem with having another very good feature?
> > >
> > > The problem is that alot of the time you don’t try to get an assassination and you accidently do, which leads to you getting killed.
> >
> > So by that logic, remove it completely?
> >
> > I kill my self with grenades quite often. 343i should remove grenades to prevent this.
> >
> > That is worst reason I have ever heard to remove a feature, no offence…
> >
> > Assassinations were a great feature in Reach, loved by most people, and therefore they should return.
>
> Theres a difference here. You threw the grenades its your fault you died. But with assassantions. There some sort of glitch that forces your player to go into the animation. As I said before they can return as long as you can turn them off.
If that feature is not present, would you survive playing Halo 4? I mean, such a great feature shouldn’t be overruled by tiny details…
> … i think the campaign will SPARK everything and im sure there will be a cinema and a forge as well,im just not sure about the multiplayer and the gameplay and im really scared that it wont be like the majority wants it to be
>
> im really NOT against changes but the changes should not be like from Halo 3 > reach,changes should be more like Halo 2 > Halo 3
>
> what do you think?
:p, i’m not sure what you mean… but… yeah, i’m confused…
> > > > > > > It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > firefight yes,great netcode yes,assassinations hell no,and invasion is only a gametype stolen from Battlefield(rush),but i do respect your opinion
> > > > >
> > > > > Why no assassinations?
> > > > >
> > > > > You know you can avoid doing them by not pressing the button to hard, so what is the problem with having another very good feature?
> > > >
> > > > The problem is that alot of the time you don’t try to get an assassination and you accidently do, which leads to you getting killed.
> > >
> > > So by that logic, remove it completely?
> > >
> > > I kill my self with grenades quite often. 343i should remove grenades to prevent this.
> > >
> > > That is worst reason I have ever heard to remove a feature, no offence…
> > >
> > > Assassinations were a great feature in Reach, loved by most people, and therefore they should return.
> >
> > Theres a difference here. You threw the grenades its your fault you died. But with assassantions. There some sort of glitch that forces your player to go into the animation. As I said before they can return as long as you can turn them off.
>
> If that feature is not present, would you survive playing Halo 4? I mean, such a great feature shouldn’t be overruled by tiny details…
Not really tiny details.
> > > > > > > It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > firefight yes,great netcode yes,assassinations hell no,and invasion is only a gametype stolen from Battlefield(rush),but i do respect your opinion
> > > > >
> > > > > Why no assassinations?
> > > > >
> > > > > You know you can avoid doing them by not pressing the button to hard, so what is the problem with having another very good feature?
> > > >
> > > > The problem is that alot of the time you don’t try to get an assassination and you accidently do, which leads to you getting killed.
> > >
> > > So by that logic, remove it completely?
> > >
> > > I kill my self with grenades quite often. 343i should remove grenades to prevent this.
> > >
> > > That is worst reason I have ever heard to remove a feature, no offence…
> > >
> > > Assassinations were a great feature in Reach, loved by most people, and therefore they should return.
> >
> > Theres a difference here. You threw the grenades its your fault you died. But with assassantions. There some sort of glitch that forces your player to go into the animation. As I said before they can return as long as you can turn them off.
>
> If that feature is not present, would you survive playing Halo 4? I mean, such a great feature shouldn’t be overruled by tiny details…
What? Tiny detail! The glitch causes my death. I could careless if the animations returned, but like I said for respect to other people it should be on and off feature.
> > > > > > > > It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > firefight yes,great netcode yes,assassinations hell no,and invasion is only a gametype stolen from Battlefield(rush),but i do respect your opinion
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why no assassinations?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You know you can avoid doing them by not pressing the button to hard, so what is the problem with having another very good feature?
> > > > >
> > > > > The problem is that alot of the time you don’t try to get an assassination and you accidently do, which leads to you getting killed.
> > > >
> > > > So by that logic, remove it completely?
> > > >
> > > > I kill my self with grenades quite often. 343i should remove grenades to prevent this.
> > > >
> > > > That is worst reason I have ever heard to remove a feature, no offence…
> > > >
> > > > Assassinations were a great feature in Reach, loved by most people, and therefore they should return.
> > >
> > > Theres a difference here. You threw the grenades its your fault you died. But with assassantions. There some sort of glitch that forces your player to go into the animation. As I said before they can return as long as you can turn them off.
> >
> > If that feature is not present, would you survive playing Halo 4? I mean, such a great feature shouldn’t be overruled by tiny details…
>
> What? Tiny detail! The glitch causes my death. I could careless if the animations returned, but like I said for respect to other people it should be on and off feature.
Ya, as long as there’s a toggle option for them it would be fine. Also @burstingbox, why would you oppose the option to be able to toggle them?
> > It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
>
> firefight yes,great netcode yes,assassinations hell no,and invasion is only a gametype stolen from Battlefield(rush),but i do respect your opinion
I say no to assassinations because it is reach. In reach every spartan has a Knife. lets keep it in reach.
> > > > > > > > > It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > firefight yes,great netcode yes,assassinations hell no,and invasion is only a gametype stolen from Battlefield(rush),but i do respect your opinion
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why no assassinations?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You know you can avoid doing them by not pressing the button to hard, so what is the problem with having another very good feature?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The problem is that alot of the time you don’t try to get an assassination and you accidently do, which leads to you getting killed.
> > > > >
> > > > > So by that logic, remove it completely?
> > > > >
> > > > > I kill my self with grenades quite often. 343i should remove grenades to prevent this.
> > > > >
> > > > > That is worst reason I have ever heard to remove a feature, no offence…
> > > > >
> > > > > Assassinations were a great feature in Reach, loved by most people, and therefore they should return.
> > > >
> > > > Theres a difference here. You threw the grenades its your fault you died. But with assassantions. There some sort of glitch that forces your player to go into the animation. As I said before they can return as long as you can turn them off.
> > >
> > > If that feature is not present, would you survive playing Halo 4? I mean, such a great feature shouldn’t be overruled by tiny details…
> >
> > What? Tiny detail! The glitch causes my death. I could careless if the animations returned, but like I said for respect to other people it should be on and off feature.
>
> Ya, as long as there’s a toggle option for them it would be fine. Also @burstingbox, why would you oppose the option to be able to toggle them?
I am not opposing the option. I am opposing the removal of assassinations if that option was not available.
> > > > > > > It should also have stuff from Reach, e.g. Firefight options, assassinations, Invasion, great netcode.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > firefight yes,great netcode yes,assassinations hell no,and invasion is only a gametype stolen from Battlefield(rush),but i do respect your opinion
> > > > >
> > > > > Why no assassinations?
> > > > >
> > > > > You know you can avoid doing them by not pressing the button to hard, so what is the problem with having another very good feature?
> > > >
> > > > The problem is that alot of the time you don’t try to get an assassination and you accidently do, which leads to you getting killed.
> > >
> > > So by that logic, remove it completely?
> > >
> > > I kill my self with grenades quite often. 343i should remove grenades to prevent this.
> > >
> > > That is worst reason I have ever heard to remove a feature, no offence…
> > >
> > > Assassinations were a great feature in Reach, loved by most people, and therefore they should return.
> >
> > Theres a difference here. You threw the grenades its your fault you died. But with assassantions. There some sort of glitch that forces your player to go into the animation. As I said before they can return as long as you can turn them off.
>
> If that feature is not present, would you survive playing Halo 4? I mean, such a great feature shouldn’t be overruled by tiny details…
Halo 2 and Halo 3 worked without Assassinations too or were even better right? so we dont need any assassinations,i didnt like them
> > … i think the campaign will SPARK everything and im sure there will be a cinema and a forge as well,im just not sure about the multiplayer and the gameplay and im really scared that it wont be like the majority wants it to be
> >
> > im really NOT against changes but the changes should not be like from Halo 3 > reach,changes should be more like Halo 2 > Halo 3
> >
> > what do you think?
>
> :p, i’m not sure what you mean… but… yeah, i’m confused…
halo 2 -> halo 3 changes:i mean things like the bubble shield and power drain and much more.
halo 3 → reach changes:classes you can choose(AAs),different core gameplay,no ranking system,boring multiplayer,maps look like im playing ratchet and clank,stupid cinema,…