I am so irritated by people who wont try to score, and just kill everyone in the map.
Don’t say, ‘They’re trying to protect the puck/ball by killing you so you don’t get to score it!’
They do it because they think its so fun to go and troll people by not playing the objective.
The worst thing is, when Hockey shows up, everyone votes for it!
> What about those who do neither, and do this? 
I’ll be completely honest. I would love to have a match like this just for a little bit
People like them are the people that convinced me to stop playing Action Sack.
I just hate when all they do is run around spraying the AR at you, not even looking to hit the ball. I suggest either limited assault rifle ammo or not have it be a secondary.
limited ammo count wouldn’t really work BC trying to score with gravity hammer is tough unless you are right in front of it you need AR to guide the ball easier. yes its annoying that people just kill one another in objective games, and the reason they do it is because they suck at slayer game types so they play objective games so they aren’t focused on as much.
Hockey isn’t really any fun for me. I liked it a lot better before they disabled assassinations. That was the only good part of that game.
> I am so irritated by people who wont try to score, and just kill everyone in the map.
> Don’t say, ‘They’re trying to protect the puck/ball by killing you so you don’t get to score it!’
> They do it because they think its so fun to go and troll people by not playing the objective.
> The worst thing is, when Hockey shows up, everyone votes for it!
Must, say I have Never experienced that. Now GB on the other hand…I have in fact my friend and I have encountered games where it becomes a 6 on 2, and Yes I know there’s only 4 people per team. Yes that means our other two team mates literally turn on us.
This is why they need to take out ALL damage in Hockey. The way it is now, you get the k/d whores who just use hockey to pad their k/d. Remove weapon damage in Hockey, and people will actually play the way it should be played.
At least they took out assassinations. It may as well have been called Team Assassinations.
> > What about those who do neither, and do this?
>
> I’ll be completely honest. I would love to have a match like this just for a little bit
Snickerdoodle, FL00RCHEESE, and I were laughing so damn hard during the whole match! The people on the other team weren’t even in our party, and they just decided to join us on top of the goal! (We were protesting, as we didn’t want to play it during the voting round) It was hilarious!
But yes, it is irritating when people simply focus on killing and completely ignore the objective, even if it’s right in front of them!
Too bad the assassinations were removed from hockey…i used to have a field day performing 10 to 20 of them. All i can depend on now is Halo Ball Xtreme and Griffball Dash.
> > > What about those who do neither, and do this?
> >
> > I’ll be completely honest. I would love to have a match like this just for a little bit
>
> Snickerdoodle, FL00RCHEESE, and I were laughing so damn hard during the whole match! The people on the other team weren’t even in our party, and they just decided to join us on top of the goal! (We were protesting, as we didn’t want to play it during the voting round) It was hilarious!
>
> But yes, it is irritating when people simply focus on killing and completely ignore the objective, even if it’s right in front of them!
I’ll probabaly get yelled at for this but YOINK it…In my opinion if you Intentionally Refuse to score to force the game to go as long as possible you are “cheating” exploiting the fact that the game cannot end until either time runs out or the score has finished. And, now I’m sure some will troll me for this. Why because I have had it happen in the past.
I do agree with you to an extent, whenever I played hocky it was slightly enjoyable to know that you could take someone out for a little to give my team an advantage
> I do agree with you to an extent, whenever I played hocky it was slightly enjoyable to know that you could take someone out for a little to give my team an advantage
Are you agreeing <mark>with me?</mark>