Using a misogynistic title as a “Broad statement” is only going to attract trolls and people flaming you for it, not anyone willing to take you seriously.
Food for thought, maybe try something a little less triggering for your larger project you have planned.
I knew there was going to be a store in Infinite, but I didn’t expect 80% of the unlockable content to be hidden inside the store. I expected some minor commendation rewards, possibly some true rank rewards… I guess I was a complete idiot for expecting core game mechanics to be in Infinite that have been present in nearly every Halo since Halo 2.
I think a quick fix for the store would be to give players a chance to earn premium currency some way.
In my days the term misogynistic didn’t exsist. It’s actually part of why I used the title because I don’t like the PC culture. Some people understood it was a joke
Some people don’t. Maybe I should’ve used a different title. Either way I have valid frustrations. You have to admit that this Halo is vastly different from all the other. Free to play. It’s on PC. New affects. New types of skins. New weapons. One can argue that there barely any Halo in it aside from the campagin and the plfact that players have the shape of a Spartan.
Obviously it exsisted. Since this is your reaction it would be hard to explain to you what it was like back then. No one had those types of words in their vobaulary like they do now. There is reason why people say that today’s gaming culture could handle mw2 lobbies. It’s because a simple opinion can be labeled mysonginistc.
Imagine a all feminine game where it’s all about doll houses and things of the like. And then one day they started adding army men dlc to the game. Some could argue. “Who cares?” But someone could also feel like their game is straight to far away from what they were used to.
I’ve said it above that I have no problem with those things or feminine things in general. I just feel that there is a fine line on what should be in a Halo game.
Almost every Halo is vastly different from the one before hand. I often joke that “combat just evolved.”
That being said, I’m pushing 36, I imagine we’re probably not too far off in age. I remember when a lot more things were just accepted for what they were. But that didn’t make it rightfully so. Jokes aside, you’re mocking and belittling the equality advancements of an entire community. Intentional or not; that’s just not cool.
I would say that’s more of a biological thing rather then a feminine and masculine thing because master chief could be feminine or masculine. My argument is more about the atmosphere of the game and how one would veiw it when comparing the older Halo games.
A simple opinion can be misogynistic. That’s always been the case. And if a more “feminine” game added optional “manly” why would I care? It’s optional. And you seem to have a problem with feminine things. And you seem to want Halo to be exclusionary. No one else seems to want that. You’re the odd person out here.
I’m someone who shares your general PC stance, but my guy this is why nobody takes your points seriously. You flip-flopped on your hardline stance in 10 minutes!
It was a word that hasn’t changed in definition since the 17th century, it existed in full capacity in 2001.
Well maybe that’s just a ripple effect that reach started and it’s waves have hit all the Halo games after that.
I’m not saying things that are bad should be accepted. Like cursing for example
Someone one not not like that and growing as a society to be more polite is a good thing. However I do feel like there had been a cultural shift to have a knee jerk reaction when someone mentions something about being a man. I think having a masculine atospehre is not always a bad thing. It can exsist. And it can be the dominant theme. That is a different conversation tho. My main gripe is that it’s starting to look a lot less like Halo with every update and not in the other direction where it would look like more Halo
My point is if I explained my reason behind the video further why call it mysongitc? Am I being against anyone in any way or have I already conceded and said that “we shall wait and see”? If they started adding ridable unicorns in multiplayer would that still be ok?
This is what I mean. There is a fine line.
I never understood this. I disagree with a lot of people’s points. I still want to hear them though. I still want to debate and converse. I don’t like echo chambers. Being surrounded by people who think differently is a good thing in my eyes. It means I get to see others perspectives and new view points. Your right I get a sasifsction of out it but not because I’m trolling. It’s because I want grow. I could easily make posts about “ohhh woah is me I’m not playing anymore”. And I can easily go on on their posts and critsize them for making that type of post. But it’s like why? Why push people away from the fourm rather than bring them in? It doesn’t make any sense especially if I repeated thorough explanations of what I ment by the video.
Only the first 3 games are. You can tell by the way people act and what type of messages they send. It’s crazy how modern games reflect their player base. Even developers.