Porrage out here swinging with the facts lol
Not at all.
Youâre digging into the words and the history behind them and not the sentiment/meaning of the post. Itâs a saying. I can say âGod of warâ is a manâs game because of how many brutal executions are in it. I can say Halo is a âmanâs gameâ because it has guns, war armor and vehicles in it. I can say taking a laxative after eating taco bell and white castle is a mans game.
None of that should be looked at as an attack on women.
Isnât almost every human extinct because of a war with aliens? Iâd say thatâs a pretty gritty universe. If thereâs comic relief throughout 7 depressing games, I would not say that would make it not gritty.
Calling something feminine to make someone out as a misogynist when theyâve already explained their position through other posts is BM. He said it ruins the immersion, you said no you hate it cause you hate women.
He said no.
You said yes.
EDIT: I took way less time than you did for that response lmao BUT THIS AINT ABOUT WPM SON
Nah, I donât take bets that easy, no thrill to it.
Yeah because you didnât actually engage with what I said.
No no no. Donât try to weasel your way out of your own words. Iâm not talking about what he said and what I said. Iâm talking about what you said. You said that calling traditionally feminine things âgirlyâ (a synonym for feminine), makes me a sexist. So if Iâm a sexist because I said that âflowersâ are girly/feminine, then by extension someone that says doll houses are feminine must also be sexist, correct?
Iâm already sexist by your definition. Iâll just go ahead and grant you that on a silver platter. My question to you, and I want you to answer this (if you say no I want an explanation), if Iâm a sexist by your definition, is the person who wrote the following quote also sexist:
No, Iâm saying flowers are universally enjoyed by both sexes, not just females 
That is NOT what you said. You said:
You said that because I think that flowers are âgirlyâ or traditionally feminine, then Iâm a sexist. Iâm not asking you whether or not flowers can be enjoyed by everyone.
Let me bring up the quote one more time:
Try one more time. You stand by your statement of calling me sexist, right? Based on the standard you put out there for me being a sexist, isnât this person also sexist?
Doll houses and things of the like seems like something for a girl.
Flowers are pretty ambiguous.
Anyone can play with a dollhouse but he specifically said
âimagine an all feminine game where itâs all about dollhouses and the likeâ
Seems like heâs making an ALLUSION to say, a barbie game for instance, adding AK47s and Humvees to the ingame shop.
Context matters and youâre leaving it out intentionally. Or youâre attacking someone for not articulating themselves to a T even though their sentiment and point is understood.
Eitherway, youâre wilnâ.
I donât know if you live in America, but flowers are absolutely not an ambiguous thing. Dudes get flowers on only one day and itâs the day theyâre put into the ground.
Seems like heâs making an ALLUSION to say, a barbie game for instance, adding AK47s and Humvees to the ingame shop.
Context matters and youâre leaving it out intentionally.
Nope, that additional context has nothing to do with him calling dollhouses feminine. In fact if you want, Iâll go ahead and re-add that context to all of my posts and it literally wonât change anything.
Well I guess by your own definition, youâre a sexist too.
Not like there was any doubt. Heâs playing Devilâs Advocate on a Volt thread.
intentionally leaving this bit out huh
Yeah you got me. I intentionally left out âeitherway, youâre wilnââ because it absolutely crushed my argument.
I genuinely donât know what context I couldâve possibly left out that wouldâve made your stance any less stupid.
Okay mods, where are you at? I think the vast majority of us would be fine with this thread being locked at this point.
no, the part where anyone can play with a dollhouse and it being an allusion. Like we all understand what he was trying to say.
Youâre saying no, this is your quote.
And there are mods here?
Agreed this thread lasted for too long
That doesnât make you look any better, my guy.
I seem to remember the initial topic thread being hidden because of community reports. But I guess the thread got the green light after all. Which was a mistake.
This isnât about looking better, this is about understanding a viewpoint different from yours and your aggressive reaction to it.
Tell me youâre insecure without telling me youâre insecure.
I understand the viewpoint perfectly fine, hence my aggressive reaction throughout the past hour or so.
False, being offended at non-inclusive social ideas and holding people accountable for what they say and do is a social responsibility, not a choice.
It is hard to imagine such a discussion.
Everyone is an individual and has the right to choose goods.
Military theory was part of the basic education I received.All effective forces are critical.This is not a matter of gender, but of spiritual preference.
Just follow your heart and choose what you like.
Itâs ok as long as itâs legal and ethical.