Halo Reach there was more wrong with it than right , i am sure all HAlo 3 dedicated online games thought this.
No ranking system
No BR
Bloom
Armour Lock
Awful Maps
Bad Perks
No Power Ups
The list goes on, the great news is Microsoft listened to the community and actually did something about it I can not wait until Halo 4 so I can stop playing COD that game is awful compared to Halo 3.
Maybe this should go in the Reach forums, due to the small amount of relevance it actually has to Halo 4. You can always report it to get direct contact with a moderator.
If you think Reach was the worst game ever produced then it’s pretty much the only game you’ve ever played.
You know you if Halo 3 was so awesome you could/can continue playing it. It hasn’t stopped having online play. This obviously belongs in the Reach section also.
Reach is the second best Halo in my opinion.
This has nothing to do with Halo 4…
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH
Oh boy OP, you’re kidding right?
Or you haven’t played a lot of games…
Either way, even if you don’t like Reach you shouldn’t be so shortsighted to say it’s the worst game ever produced, when little gems like these exsist.
Games like E.T. and Superman 64 are genuinely and objectively bad games.
Reach by no means is a bad game.
By no objective standards.
I can understand people not liking it, but it’s simply not a bad game.
Look: I don’t like H3 that much…in fact, I think it’s easily the worst Halo game out there…but it’s not a bad game.
I also don’t like Zelda OoT…again: not liking =/= bad game.
People here need to get that into their skulls…
IMO Halo Rwach was the was game ever produced you guys may beg to differ thats your opinion Halo 3 was awesome, this has everything to do with Halo 4 as its the game before Mupppppets
It isn’t THAT bad, guys. Sure, it had lots of canon related problems and the multiplayer wasn’t that good, but look at what it introduced; an evolved forge mode, wider variety of customizable settings, first person cutscenes, a more advanced matchmaking system, armor customization, active roster, better menu and lobby layout.
Don’t always just look at the cons. There are some pros in there, too.
> IMO Halo Rwach was the was game ever produced you guys may beg to differ thats your opinion Halo 3 was awesome, this has everything to do with Halo 4 as its the game before Mupppppets
Either you’re trolling really hard, or you should take a class in English.
Because this is what I read:
Halo Reach was a game that was produced, we may not agree with that (it was produced) but somehow Halo 4 is a game that comes before a Muppets game.
Real coherent story there bro…
Either way: you’re still wrong.
I’ve played FAR WORE games…believe me…
Yes I’ve had the misfortune to play terrible games like Mindjack…shudders
Reach it’s not a real flop…
If you go back to Halo 3 you will remember all the problems that Reach solved, and WTF? Perks?
Some things the OP should know:
Reach was not a flop. In the 3 years since it’s release, it has continued to outsell Halo 3’s numbers over the same period of time
Reach did not feature perks of any kind.
Reach was born from community input after Halo 3. Do you know why we have visible health, health packs, and no dual-wielding? Because people wanted a more CE-like game. Remove AAs and Reach is the closer to Halo CE than any other Halo game.
Those are just 3 factoids for now. If you want some more, I’ve got quite a pool to pull from.
> Reach it’s not a real flop…
> If you go back to Halo 3 you will remember all the problems that Reach solved, and WTF? Perks?
Exactly.
This relates to Halo 4…how?
Reach is definitely, by far, the best Halo after Halo 3. We just got a bit too spoilt with Halo 3. And I’d hardly call it anywhere near ‘the worst game ever produced’. You think Call of Duty is better? Then you’re obviously not a big Halo fan and shouldn’t be commenting on Reach at all.
> If you think Reach was the worst game ever produced then it’s pretty much the only game you’ve ever played.
This. Reach is better than a lot of games. Plus, the majority of your reasons are just plain stupid.
No ranking system? No BR? Well I guess that means Halo CE was bad then.
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH
>
>
> Oh boy OP, you’re kidding right?
> Or you haven’t played a lot of games…
>
> Either way, even if you don’t like Reach you shouldn’t be so shortsighted to say it’s the worst game ever produced, when little gems like these exsist.
> Games like E.T. and Superman 64 are genuinely and objectively bad games.
>
> Reach by no means is a bad game.
> By no objective standards.
>
> I can understand people not liking it, but it’s simply not a bad game.
> Look: <mark>I don’t like H3 that much…in fact, I think it’s easily the worst Halo game out there…but it’s not a bad game.</mark>
> I also don’t like Zelda OoT…again: not liking =/= bad game.
> People here need to get that into their skulls…
Exactly my opinion about Halo 3.
Yes, it’s a great game, but I enjoy all the other Halo’s more.
OT: But please, post something like this in the right forum, or just don’t post anything at all…
Who in this thread is a 50 in Halo 3 as they will know that reach was awful, it was a game any one could pick up and play not like Halo 3 which needed skill and some hard work.
Perks what do you call jetpack armour lock and invinsibility.
Halo Reach is an awful game multiplayer was aimed at Noobs
My point was i was a massive massiv eHalo 3 player played it 3 years staright Reach comes out an fails massively COD and Battlefield were the only alternative I am hoping Halo 4 is similiar to 3 and I think it is.