Halo Reach Player Counter?

I was playing halo reach from the Xbox one the other day and noticed that there weren’t any more player counters for the game modes and general population. The other week I saw it up at 10,000, so why isn’t there a counter anymore? Why was it decided to be taken down?

> 2533274878499784;1:
> I was playing halo reach from the Xbox one the other day and noticed that there weren’t any more player counters for the game modes and general population. The other week I saw it up at 10,000, so why isn’t there a counter anymore? Why was it decided to be taken down?

Probably to make you think reach is dead so you move on to the modern games.

> 2533274878499784;1:
> I was playing halo reach from the Xbox one the other day and noticed that there weren’t any more player counters for the game modes and general population. The other week I saw it up at 10,000, so why isn’t there a counter anymore? Why was it decided to be taken down?

Did this honestly get taken down? If so, what’s the point? It was always on the home page. Going to make me really pissed off if that’s true.

I posted the same thing in a thread earlier but whatever. I don’t know why they would go back to a 6 year old game and get rid of the population counter but if they did take it out so you can not see Reach’s population that is really messed up. Then again its kinda funny to think they can’t compete with a 6 year old bungie game LMFAO

Reach still has many players. It’s just a glitch I think

> 2535421345821456;5:
> Reach still has many players. It’s just a glitch I think

a lot of players when arguing about the state of halo will cite reach’s population as a way to show that new halo mechanics are not good. Some of us are theorizing 343 removed the population counter to stop anti 343 people from citing it.

^ -Yoink- 343 if that is their reason, they are to busy trying to censor and ignore fans than actually face problems.

> 2533274871484132;6:
> > 2535421345821456;5:
> > Reach still has many players. It’s just a glitch I think
>
>
> a lot of players when arguing about the state of halo will cite reach’s population as a way to show that new halo mechanics are not good. Some of us are theorizing 343 removed the population counter to stop anti 343 people from citing it.

That could be true but it seems more like a server bug to me. Similar to how all challenges were gone from halo 4 for months, but they recently fixed that problem about 2 months ago.

343 being sly -Yoinks!-… If you can’t compete with an 6 year old game, try to -Yoinking!- improve your own -Yoink- before doing something like this

Reach is still my favorite I’ll be checking on this I hadn’t heard it was down… That’s really disappointing to me that they want to resort to taking down Bungie’s masterpiece to bring a light to their games><

> 2535461343678665;10:
> That’s really disappointing to me that they want to resort to taking down Bungie’s masterpiece to bring a light to their games><

They already did their damage to Reach by putting in garbage community maps and taking out Action Sack. Sure zero bloom is nice and no complaints about armor lock being nerfed, but heretics in FF were never fun and the DLC prices should have been reduced or free.

This thread is lucky to still be up I’ve seen others taken down. It’s been over a week now which is more then enough time to sort this issue out. The least they could do is address us on the situation considering it’s probablythe most populated Halo game out.

> 2533274871484132;6:
> > 2535421345821456;5:
> > Reach still has many players. It’s just a glitch I think
>
>
> a lot of players when arguing about the state of halo will cite reach’s population as a way to show that new halo mechanics are not good. Some of us are theorizing 343 removed the population counter to stop anti 343 people from citing it.

I would not be surprised…