> 2535442292537369;4:
> People couldn’t adapt to Reach. People can’t adapt to Halo 5. Some adapted to both and loved it, and some hated everything but Halo 3. Reach won’t take over, but will gain a nice population boost.
This is what I find hilarious. People must forget or weren’t around when H3 came out because the forums looked similar to this (not as bad). Every other thread was about how H3 ruined Halo.
It doesn’t matter which halo you like we will have the halo cycle.
> 2533274852088914;283:
> I loved Reach’s story and Firefight, but other than that, in hindsight, it wasn’t all that great of a game. I would probably give it a spin for nostalgia’s sake, but I could never really get behind the multiplayer for it. I would definitely stick with Halo 5.
>
> Concerning armor abilities, it drives me crazy when people bash the Spartan abilities of Halo 5 but have no problem with Reach. The AA’s in Reach were horribly unbalanced and threw so many unnecessary kinks into the gameplay. At least with Halo 5, the goal to have balanced multiplayer includes the Spartan abilities. Everyone has the same abilities, and everyone can use them. If you loaded out with Armor Lock in Reach, you automatically had an unbalanced advantage over everyone else.
Depends on how you used it and if used poorly you paid the price.
well in all honesty reach wasnt that good either. 2 and 3 are the best its gonna get sadly
Reach forever. Just bump it up to 1080p 60 fps and our original ranks and armour and it’s the perfect Halo.
> 2533274881172148;305:
> Reach forever. Just bump it up to 1080p 60 fps and our original ranks and armour and it’s the perfect Halo.
> 2533274881172148;305:
> Reach forever. Just bump it up to 1080p 60 fps and our original ranks and armour and it’s the perfect Halo.
Pretty much yes except some tweaking of armour abilities would be needed.
> 2533274824790279;1:
> I see a good amount of people posting about Halo Reach Being so good and so much better than Halo 5. That its gonna take over when it’s backwards compatible… Let me ask you this, Have you forgotten what Reach did to Halo??
> Thats the game that started the downward spiral for the community. It caused confusion of what Halo was and is. I enjoy Reach to an extent but it had loads of issues. It was a Halo that the majority of the community hated. Sorry for the reality check.
> I know Halo 5 isn’t perfect but it has the potential to be one of the best Halo’s there is.
However, halo reach had a ginormous amount of content when it came out. compared to halo 5, which has no content at all, I’d rather play halo reach instead. And with a campaign, that isn’t so short and insanely hard on legendary, i’d rather play reach
Do we have a solid date for the BC of Reach btw?
If the MCC worked as smoothly as Halo 5 i wouldn’t even go near Reach with a ten foot pole. Halo 3 is where it’s at and it’s where it will always be at. That being said… Halo 5 over Reach every day of the week.
Halo 5 for me
think the problem with some people is that they look back,at all their fond memories of Reach, Halo 3, Halo 2, and Halo CE with rose tinted glasses. T
> 2533274824790279;1:
> I see a good amount of people posting about Halo Reach Being so good and so much better than Halo 5. That its gonna take over when it’s backwards compatible… Let me ask you this, Have you forgotten what Reach did to Halo??
> Thats the game that started the downward spiral for the community. It caused confusion of what Halo was and is. I enjoy Reach to an extent but it had loads of issues. It was a Halo that the majority of the community hated. Sorry for the reality check.
> I know Halo 5 isn’t perfect but it has the potential to be one of the best Halo’s there is.
Incorrect on every statement. I wish they wouldn’t let 12 yr olds on this site
Only things I liked about reach was that awesome space combat mission and the emotional ending. Multiplayer sucked balls
Halo 5
Halo Reach was great, but I do believe halo 5 can get there. Considering all the new things coming soon.
> 2533274973970056;316:
> Halo Reach was great, but I do believe halo 5 can get there. Considering all the new things coming soon.
I feel much the same. One change they could make is letting your spartan armor be playable in campaign.
I like both Equally, but if I had to choose one, I’d choose Halo 5
Not even a contest. Halo 5 is so much better and more competitive than Reach.
Reach had armor lock. That takes it out of consideration from any argument.
> 2533274832183516;23:
> > 2533274903975459;7:
> > I have gotten to the point that everyone who considers Halo Reach as the best Halo hasn’t reached the age of 16 yet.
> > I remember what Halo Reach did for me, it made me resent Halo and stop playing for a while.
>
>
> I wont consider any Halo the best but I find Halo Reach to be my favorite and I am 26, so… where do I stand? Everyone has their opinions, I just hope some have GOOD evidence to back it up?
26 here also…Reach is my absolute favorite to play (though I cant put down 5 right now)