> 2533274820171137;12:
> Yes, exactly, 343 tried to give character to Chief, which I liked. He felt pretty dated, something you could do and get away with in 2001.
>
> Halo 5 saw a weird return of Cortana, who was thought to be dead after the events of Halo 4. And by the end of the story, she has become more of an antagonist than a relatable character, as she embraced her superiority as an AI and turns against humanity. And there was Spartan Locke, who just showed up, said very little and nobody quite got why he was there or what his motives were. And of course Buck, because Nathan Fillion needed the buck to buy a sports car. And Chief supposedly was long time friends with the members in his squad, which really didn’t show and was only intelligible via books and whatnot.
>
> All I’m saying is that the setting is in a difficult place and it will be difficult to make this work.
>
> I mean it’s no shame to cut loose from a setting you’ve created rather than trying to tie together this mess. Not one single character pulled its weight in Halo 5 and there was a total lack of focus.
>
> I’m still curious to see in what direction the Master Chief saga will go and if this sequel takes off, i’ll at least give it a chance.
>
> What I meant by handing the franchise over was not a pay to win debacle as BF 2. But I think that 343 has left their mark on the franchise in a good way and could now hand it over to some company who is still eager to do just that and give us their own take on Halo. Because I think whatever fresh wind 343 could bring to this franchise, has been exhausted.
I want to believe that Cortana’s behaviour in the game is due to the Logic Plague. I really, really wish it’s true.
Yes… it is… but what other setting will 343 use?
One of the reasons the story failed is because there we’re too many characters. Chief, Kelly, Fred, Linda, Locke, Tanaka, Buck, Vale, Thomas Lasky, Palmer, Thel 'Vadam, Jul 'Mdama (minor), Roland, Cortana, Warden Eternal, Exuberant Witness… is there anyone I missed?
I honestly want Halo 6 to be the end of Chief’s story. Why not give this Legend a rest? Look for how long he has fought and all his achievements. He’s basically, the most experienced war-veteran in the UNSC. But giving him a good ending won’t be easy. Halo 6 could later have campaign expansions where you use Fireteam Osiris, for example. Maybe Fireteam Crimson too (Your fireteam in Spartan Ops), as well as Thel 'Vadam with some other Elites with a different playstyle (like classic but with Active Camo, like in Halo 2). That way, you get to expand the campaign more than having them all mashed into the main story, from different points of view and different objectives.
Ok, but I think handing it over to another company is a really bad idea. Think of Metal Gear for example. Because it’s not develop by… that company (don’t remember the name), Konami literally screwed the franchise with a totally different style of what the series’s known for. Metal Gear Survive looks more action-based rather than stealth-based, which is one of the reasons why it wasn’t received as well. When your handing over your IP to another company, chances are that they will change what the series’s known for. 343 was made by dedicated Halo fans, which later expanded to become what it is now. Even it’s name was inspired by a character of the franchise.
Even if 343’s out of ideas, handing the IP over to another company wouldn’t make things better.