Halo complainers make no sense.

I don’t understand. You say “I want it to be the same as halo 3” but your excuse that halo is better then cod is because it is different. Aiming mechanics this, aiming mechanics that. Guys really? We are better then this. Can we stand up for this game instead of criticizing it over little nooks and crannies. I just don’t understand. If you want halo to be in the golden age you guys need to support the game not bash on it for a dumb reason. Just please guys, bring us back to the golden age instead of bashing on the game, that’s all I ask.

If you support a game with terrible mechanics, minimal content, and horrid unlock systems, you will keep getting games with just that: garbage.

People love to hate. If you give them what they asked for they would still find something to complain about

Don’t fix what isn’t broken. The thrusters, new weapons, maps, vehicles, are all good additions. But when you change a core mechanic of the game? That’s when it becomes problematic. Dead zones and aim acceleration? Why did they feel that halo needed that?

> 2533274830926790;2:
> If you support a game with terrible mechanics, minimal content, and horrid unlock systems, you will keep getting games with just that: garbage.

What do you mean by minimal content? The amount of weapon variants, and customization is mind blowing.

Halo 5 will NEVER bring Halo back to the Golden Era of Halo. Its severely lacking content.

> 2533274795070582;6:
> Halo 5 will NEVER bring Halo back to the Golden Era of Halo. Its severely lacking content.

What content is it lacking I can guarantee I can prove you wrong if you list them.

Please stop with this argument, it’s been happening since Halo: Reach and is not true. No one is saying that they wan’t the exact same game as it’s precursor, but that doesn’t mean basic mechanics should be changed which goes against the core gameplay of Halo CE - Halo 3. For example: Halo 3 added equipment, but that equipment was only found on the map (you did not start with it). Halo 4 had this loadout nonsense which didn’t give equal footing for everyone (Promethean Vision? Easiest games of my life).

What I will say is despite this ADS shenanigans, the gameplay from a multiplayer perspective has already exceeded that of Halo: Reach and Halo 4, and is a step in the right direction.

> 2533274830702421;7:
> > 2533274795070582;6:
> > Halo 5 will NEVER bring Halo back to the Golden Era of Halo. Its severely lacking content.
>
>
> What content is it lacking I can guarantee I can prove you wrong if you list them.

Playlists without sprinting/thrusting/clamber. A healthy number of playlists with classic gameplay would get me to buy H5.

> 2535464170072426;10:
> in the old days the community believed in the Developer and appreciated their effort in the game.

No they didn’t, week one cancer has been around here in both Halo 4 and Halo 5, and on Bungie.net with Halo 2, Halo 3, and Halo: Reach.

No game is perfect. Game devs need criticism to make it better, even if better isn’t better for some. Their is a difference between accepting a game, and laying down for a crappy one.

> 2533274839589602;13:
> No game is perfect. Game devs need criticism to make it better, even if better isn’t better for some. Their is a difference between accepting a game, and laying down for a crappy one.

true but they also need to be legitimate

> 2533274830702421;1:
> I don’t understand. You say “I want it to be the same as halo 3” but your excuse that halo is better then cod is because it is different. Aiming mechanics this, aiming mechanics that. Guys really? We are better then this. Can we stand up for this game instead of criticizing it over little nooks and crannies. I just don’t understand. If you want halo to be in the golden age you guys need to support the game not bash on it for a dumb reason. Just please guys, bring us back to the golden age instead of bashing on the game, that’s all I ask.

People complain because they want it to be better. Halo used to be the best shooter. CoD came out with better improvements and better aiming mechanics. Halo 5 could be the best shooter if they adjust the things people complain about. Aiming is an obvious issue. It’s broken because it moves faster to the left than it does to the right. There are numerous articles on this exact issue.

To ‘‘bash on the game for a dumb reason’’ would be to say something like ‘‘sprinting is so stupid Halo 3 had no sprinting’’ or ‘‘the DMR is so lame just make it all BRs.’’ Those are opinions. The aiming mechanics thing is a well established fact. You may not notice it enough to identify exactly what it is, but most people have noticed that it is a lot harder to aim consistently in Halo 5.

From what I see there is some constructive criticism from people who still enjoy the game for its strengths and then there is the downright whiners. These people leave, have no intention of staying, but feel the need to come in here and give us their mind.

> 2533274830926790;2:
> If you support a game with terrible mechanics, minimal content, and horrid unlock systems, you will keep getting games with just that: garbage.

Which is why Call of Duty is still a thing.

> 2535452639323332;17:
> > 2533274830926790;2:
> > If you support a game with terrible mechanics, minimal content, and horrid unlock systems, you will keep getting games with just that: garbage.
>
>
> Which is why Call of Duty is still a thing.

Cod has good mechanics. Well, Advanced Warfare not so much.

But the core gameplay has always been solid, even if it has been reskinned into a new game every year.