This post has been edited by a moderator. Please refrain from posting spam.
K. An 8 is also the infinity sign tipped on its side.
I MAD OHOHOHO.
na
cod and bf3 got a 9…which is a 6 turned upside down…umad?
Actually what I don’t understand is how IGN gave MGS:HD a 8.5 in graphics and gave Anniversary only an 8.0 when the graphics are CLEARLY better. Besides, MGS:HD is just presents “smoother textures” and no real graphical enhancements. Give me a break.
> u mad? lmao!
8=great!
> Actually what I don’t understand is how IGN gave MGS:HD a 8.5 in graphics and gave Anniversary only an 8.0 when the graphics are CLEARLY better. Besides, MGS:HD is just presents “smoother textures” and no real graphical enhancements. Give me a break.
Different reviewers. Different scores/opinions.
You heard this from where? IGN?
I rest my case.
Nope. Because I enjoy the game. <3 Halo:CEA
> You heard this from where? IGN?
>
> I rest my case.
Reach got 9.5
umad?
Im not mad…ok, maybe a bit insane 
8 is a fine score, I’d give it that as well.
They also called MW3 “amazing,” and gave it a 9.0. Yea I don’t exactly think the reviewers know what they’re supposed to be reviewing at IGN…
Lol an 8 on a remake? That sounds damn good to me. We all know how bad a remake of anything can potentially be. An 8 means this will live up to the excitement.
EDIT: Where is the review? I googled “Halo CEA Review IGN” and nothing came up for it.
That link you gave was the link to post a reply to the thread lol.
> u mad? lmao!
A “8” is better then a “3” or 2 or a 1 
> That link you gave was the link to post a reply to the thread lol.
whoops haha my bad
In my opinion this review is completely bias and farfetched. He seems happy with the game and the way he is reviewing it should earn a 8.5 or 9 but he gives it an 8. I agree with the frame rate but it just seems like he wants to give it an “good” grade.