I have been reading on the forums and people are flaming people for there ideas. A good example is should assassinations be in halo 4? People were saying no and that it is not halo because it wasnt in the past halos. Thats dumb, when are people going to realize that halo is never going back to the simlpe halo ce sandbox. Halo has to evolve because thats what other games have to do to bring in more fans but keep the ones it already has. I will tell you one thing for a fact, halo reach lost alot of the core halo fans but halo reach was enjoyed by cod and battlefield players which is very odd to me. But halo has to change as the years go on because what is expected form any game company. If we always had this agurement about what halo is than what would halo two or three look like? We loved them because they were all diferent. AA’s was a great add-on but is wasn’t the AA’s that made reach unenjoyable, reaches maps all were close corters with no vechiles and the maps werent halo they were something you would find in any other game. It wasnt just the maps it was the weapons, they weren’t balanced.
But all im saying is halo is going to change so dont expect halo is going to become a halo ce sandbox. I’ll be happy if im wrong.
> A good example is should assassinations be in halo 4? People were saying no and that it is not halo because it wasnt in the past halos.
If you were referring to the other thread on the main page no one said that.
> the maps werent halo
Ironic.
> the maps werent halo
Ironic.
[/quote]
Yeah is was on purpose. 
When ideas like
> You could collect “Power Cores” from Spartan corpses by walking over them.
>
> X number of Power Cores could be used to buff the weapon you are holding.
You can see why people instantly resort to flaming.