Why are people already talking about what they want in Halo 6? Like c’mon… halo 5 just came out a few months ago? Is it already bad enough? I think Halo 5 is a great game, they just need to add a few things to get it in its place.
Well, some people are already talking about Halo 6 because they want to implement some changes in the formula that didn’t get done in Halo 5, like removing armor abilities, sprint, and some other stuff, to make the game more in line with the original games. I mean, Halo 5 has dropped out of the Xbox Live most played list, that has to say something about the quality of the game.
I’m not saying that the game’s quality is bad, but it is sub-par compared to other Halo games at their launches.
Well if they refuse to fix halo 5 lets hope 6 is better that’s all have to say
> 2533274915643658;2:
> Well, some people are already talking about Halo 6 because they want to implement some changes in the formula that didn’t get done in Halo 5, like removing armor abilities, sprint, and some other stuff, to make the game more in line with the original games. I mean, Halo 5 has dropped out of the Xbox Live most played list, that has to say something about the quality of the game.
> I’m not saying that the game’s quality is bad, but it is sub-par compared to other Halo games at their launches.
I feel like the game developers are trying to make something new. I really don’t think they will go back to the old style games. Probably to compete with other newer games.
> 2533274873098929;4:
> > 2533274915643658;2:
> > Well, some people are already talking about Halo 6 because they want to implement some changes in the formula that didn’t get done in Halo 5, like removing armor abilities, sprint, and some other stuff, to make the game more in line with the original games. I mean, Halo 5 has dropped out of the Xbox Live most played list, that has to say something about the quality of the game.
> > I’m not saying that the game’s quality is bad, but it is sub-par compared to other Halo games at their launches.
>
>
> I feel like the game developers are trying to make something new. I really don’t think they will go back to the old style games. Probably to compete with other newer games.
Halo never needed the new stuff. To be honest, since every other developer does the generic “enhanced movement” of sprint, boost-dash, slide, etc., Halo would be “new” in comparison if it went to the older/better gameplay. That would be fresh. You don’t compete with other franchises by stealing mechanics that make those games what they are; that’s Halo 4 did, and almost everybody on Waypoint dislikes Halo 4’s multiplayer with a passion. Campaign-wise, Halo 4 was pretty good, but when it strayed away from the original formula by implementing Ordinance, loadouts, and sprint as default, there was a vocal push back by many gamers.
> 2533274915643658;5:
> > 2533274873098929;4:
> > > 2533274915643658;2:
> > > Well, some people are already talking about Halo 6 because they want to implement some changes in the formula that didn’t get done in Halo 5, like removing armor abilities, sprint, and some other stuff, to make the game more in line with the original games. I mean, Halo 5 has dropped out of the Xbox Live most played list, that has to say something about the quality of the game.
> > > I’m not saying that the game’s quality is bad, but it is sub-par compared to other Halo games at their launches.
> >
> >
> > I feel like the game developers are trying to make something new. I really don’t think they will go back to the old style games. Probably to compete with other newer games.
>
>
> Halo never needed the new stuff. To be honest, since every other developer does the generic “enhanced movement” of sprint, boost-dash, slide, etc., Halo would be “new” in comparison if it went to the older/better gameplay. That would be fresh. You don’t compete with other franchises by stealing mechanics that make those games what they are; that’s Halo 4 did, and almost everybody on Waypoint dislikes Halo 4’s multiplayer with a passion. Campaign-wise, Halo 4 was pretty good, but when it strayed away from the original formula by implementing Ordinance, loadouts, and sprint as default, there was a vocal push back by many gamers.
Then tell me why when people played MCC Halo 4 was almost always voted for?
> 2533274873098929;4:
> > 2533274915643658;2:
> > Well, some people are already talking about Halo 6 because they want to implement some changes in the formula that didn’t get done in Halo 5, like removing armor abilities, sprint, and some other stuff, to make the game more in line with the original games. I mean, Halo 5 has dropped out of the Xbox Live most played list, that has to say something about the quality of the game.
> > I’m not saying that the game’s quality is bad, but it is sub-par compared to other Halo games at their launches.
>
>
> I feel like the game developers are trying to make something new. I really don’t think they will go back to the old style games. Probably to compete with other newer games.
A Jack of all Trades will never beat a Specialist in it’s own field.
Because they want a true Halo game!
Nothing needs to be added. A lot needs to be removed such as sprint, spartan charge, fuel rod has 10 rockets in it? I mean come on do bad kids really need that many rockets? Assault rifle are cross map killers for some reason and automatic weapons take no skill to aim. Why make that such a game changer?
> some people are already talking about Halo 6 because they want to implement some changes in the formula that didn’t get done in Halo 5, like removing armor abilities, sprint, and some other stuff, to make the game more in line with the original games. I mean, Halo 5 has dropped out of the Xbox Live most played list, that has to say something about the quality of the game
Every other game has sprint so halo won’t appeal to the fans of those games. Some of the fan base already left halo because of sprint but if they remove it in halo 6, halo will definitely die. What I’m trying to say is that sprint is actually helping halo instead of hurting it. For all you guys that think sprint is the apocalypse, they might add a classic playlist in halo 6. I’m sorry, but the original style of halo is gone. We live in an era where people like fast paced action and being able to quickly dash away. COD was never as fast as it is now and halo had to adapt to survive.
> 2533274863263967;6:
> > 2533274915643658;5:
> > > 2533274873098929;4:
> > > > 2533274915643658;2:
> > > > Well, some people are already talking about Halo 6 because they want to implement some changes in the formula that didn’t get done in Halo 5, like removing armor abilities, sprint, and some other stuff, to make the game more in line with the original games. I mean, Halo 5 has dropped out of the Xbox Live most played list, that has to say something about the quality of the game.
> > > > I’m not saying that the game’s quality is bad, but it is sub-par compared to other Halo games at their launches.
> > >
> > >
> > > I feel like the game developers are trying to make something new. I really don’t think they will go back to the old style games. Probably to compete with other newer games.
> >
> >
> > Halo never needed the new stuff. To be honest, since every other developer does the generic “enhanced movement” of sprint, boost-dash, slide, etc., Halo would be “new” in comparison if it went to the older/better gameplay. That would be fresh. You don’t compete with other franchises by stealing mechanics that make those games what they are; that’s Halo 4 did, and almost everybody on Waypoint dislikes Halo 4’s multiplayer with a passion. Campaign-wise, Halo 4 was pretty good, but when it strayed away from the original formula by implementing Ordinance, loadouts, and sprint as default, there was a vocal push back by many gamers.
>
>
> Then tell me why when people played MCC Halo 4 was almost always voted for?
Because it was the only game in the MCC that worked decently well. The entire MCC forum was in flames when everybody were voting for Halo 4, with people even saying " Halo 2 or I quit." Fact is, the MCC was and still is broken, matchmaking almost never works, at least for me, and when I do get a match, it’s not a dedicated server that 343i was touting as a selling point for the MCC, so I get mega-lag in any match.
> 2533274915643658;2:
> Well, some people are already talking about Halo 6 because they want to implement some changes in the formula that didn’t get done in Halo 5, like removing armor abilities, sprint, and some other stuff, to make the game more in line with the original games. I mean, Halo 5 has dropped out of the Xbox Live most played list, that has to say something about the quality of the game.
> I’m not saying that the game’s quality is bad, but it is sub-par compared to other Halo games at their launches.
Hopefully by the end of the free DLC it will be an even better game than Reach.
> 2535455681930574;10:
> > some people are already talking about Halo 6 because they want to implement some changes in the formula that didn’t get done in Halo 5, like removing armor abilities, sprint, and some other stuff, to make the game more in line with the original games. I mean, Halo 5 has dropped out of the Xbox Live most played list, that has to say something about the quality of the game
>
>
> Every other game has sprint so halo won’t appeal to the fans of those games. Some of the fan base already left halo because of sprint but if they remove it in halo 6, halo will definitely die. What I’m trying to say is that sprint is actually helping halo instead of hurting it. For all you guys that think sprint is the apocalypse, they might add a classic playlist in halo 6. I’m sorry, but the original style of halo is gone. We live in an era where people like fast paced action and being able to quickly dash away. COD was never as fast as it is now and halo had to adapt to survive.
I’m sorry. What?
What you said made perfect sense, but at they same time it condenses down to a TL;DR statement that reads “CoD started being fast, so we had to copy them, because our fans want whatever CoD is doing.”
The thing 343 is doing to try to keep Halo alive is exactly what’s making it worse.
> 2535455681930574;10:
> > some people are already talking about Halo 6 because they want to implement some changes in the formula that didn’t get done in Halo 5, like removing armor abilities, sprint, and some other stuff, to make the game more in line with the original games. I mean, Halo 5 has dropped out of the Xbox Live most played list, that has to say something about the quality of the game
>
>
> Every other game has sprint so halo won’t appeal to the fans of those games. Some of the fan base already left halo because of sprint but if they remove it in halo 6, halo will definitely die. What I’m trying to say is that sprint is actually helping halo instead of hurting it. For all you guys that think sprint is the apocalypse, they might add a classic playlist in halo 6. I’m sorry, but the original style of halo is gone. We live in an era where people like fast paced action and being able to quickly dash away. COD was never as fast as it is now and halo had to adapt to survive.
So who cares what those people want? They want wall-running and ironsights and fast times to kill and mantling; in essence, what they are asking for is a game that rips the gameplay mechanics from Call of Duty. This isn’t Call of Duty. This is Halo. Halo was not about sprint and boost dashes and ironsight animations and all of this other crap. If they want to play a fast paced game, then they can play the last five installments of Call of Duty. Or Destiny. Or Titanfall. Why does Halo have to change? Why can’t Halo try to use its unique traits to bring those players over from the land of generic modern military / near future shooters? Why does Halo have to crawl into that generic genre of modern military shooters?
> 2533274915643658;14:
> > 2535455681930574;10:
> > > some people are already talking about Halo 6 because they want to implement some changes in the formula that didn’t get done in Halo 5, like removing armor abilities, sprint, and some other stuff, to make the game more in line with the original games. I mean, Halo 5 has dropped out of the Xbox Live most played list, that has to say something about the quality of the game
> >
> >
> > Every other game has sprint so halo won’t appeal to the fans of those games. Some of the fan base already left halo because of sprint but if they remove it in halo 6, halo will definitely die. What I’m trying to say is that sprint is actually helping halo instead of hurting it. For all you guys that think sprint is the apocalypse, they might add a classic playlist in halo 6. I’m sorry, but the original style of halo is gone. We live in an era where people like fast paced action and being able to quickly dash away. COD was never as fast as it is now and halo had to adapt to survive.
>
>
> So who cares what those people want? They want wall-running and ironsights and fast times to kill and mantling; in essence, what they are asking for is a game that rips the gameplay mechanics from Call of Duty. This isn’t Call of Duty. This is Halo. Halo was not about sprint and boost dashes and ironsight animations and all of this other crap. If they want to play a fast paced game, then they can play the last five installments of Call of Duty. Or Destiny. Or Titanfall. Why does Halo have to change? Why can’t Halo try to use its unique traits to bring those players over from the land of generic modern military / near future shooters? Why does Halo have to crawl into that generic genre of modern military shooters?
Thing is though. half the abilities that they added into the game are things that Spartans can do. Grabbing a ledge because you can’t reach it? Adds more vertical styled gameplay, Sprinting is fine, why take it out. Halo is not generic, it hasn’t ever been. It’s one of the only shooters out there that requires tactical strategy and gameplay. A list of games you can’t carry a team in. Team Fortress 2, Counter Strike, Quake, Halo. All of these shooters in essence. Are Arena shooters. Less with CS. They all require teamwork and strategy. Halo is different however from ALL of them. When you say generic shooters. What classifies as a generic shooter. COD? Battlefield? Titanfall? Destiny? The only games that even come close to being similar on this list is Titanfall and COD when it comes to gameplay. Battlefield is a tactical shooter but its requires ZERO strategy, because the highest level guys with the best guns are going to straight up destroy the opposing team. Destiny, strictly speaking multiplayer. It combines the health of halo with Battlefields “If you’re a high level you’re overpowered” style gameplay. Think of destiny what you will, I agree it’s a -Yoink- game but it is quite unique in it’s own right. That leaves us with 2 Shooters. COD and titanfall. Lets be real here. The only thing similar is the movement and that’s it. TTK is higher on Titanfall. There’s a second Tier to the game which involves giant mechs running around. In essence gameplay is nothing like COD. I’ve played all of these games quite thoroughly with the exception of Destiny. I can tell you, they all play differently and feel differently. The game here with the fastest TTK is COD. And it’s the only shooter of it’s kind. ADS and Sprint are a STAPLE in military shooters. Insurgency is another one. It’s extremely realistic, has sprint and ADS. And it doesn’t feel anything like COD. You wanna know something. Warzone is the only gamemode of it’s kind. PvPvE while capturing bases and trying to destroy the enemy core or reaching 1000 points. There is no Genre of modern military shooters when the only Modern Military shooters are Battlefield. Everything else is set in futuristic timelines.
To clarify. Halo is unique. Halo 5 IS unique. It’s one of the only shooters that has a lot of vertical gameplay even BEFORE lots of these games existed. Remember Boarding Action from CE? 5 levels all exposed on 2 different sides. It’s the ONLY map of it’s kind. You’re telling me Halo 5 is non unique when it’s the most Polished, balanced and difficult multiplayer that exists on a console? Halo multiplayer has NEVER been this balanced and polished. yes AR’s can kill from across the map, if you zoom in and burst control your shots. It’s not like you can spray and get a kill across the map. In fact. Burst control on an AR across map takes about as much skill as using a BR or DMR from that range. I’ve watched Halo Evolve from day one. The only game which let people down gameplay wise was Halo Reach And Halo 4. Bungies last and 343’s First. Halo 5 has the best multiplayer since halo 2. To deny it’s uniqueness is retarded. In fact it’s still only the SECOND game which has weapons that spawn on the map and require map control. I was playing Rig and if you coordinate your team to block the enemy from spawning around the BR House area, you can prevent your enemy from getting into your Zone. The only power weapons they have access too are PC in Nest, and Scattershot in basement. From the position we were in we had a steady supply of BR’s, Height and tactical advantage, Sniper spawn and Camo Spawn. We slaughtered the enemy team because they couldn’t rush, and we controlled the map. That’s how a Tactical shooter works and you cannot deny that it isn’t Unique To halo because IT IS unique to Halo. So get of your high horse. Stop talking rubbish about a so called Modern Military Shooter genre when it doesn’t exist. Halo isn’t turning into COD, and it’s not copying anything from it. It evolved into what you see today and it is -Yoink- beautiful.
P.S. I’m still waiting on Infection though. (It’s confirmed for a March release so that’s good)
> 2533274873098929;4:
> > 2533274915643658;2:
> > Well, some people are already talking about Halo 6 because they want to implement some changes in the formula that didn’t get done in Halo 5, like removing armor abilities, sprint, and some other stuff, to make the game more in line with the original games. I mean, Halo 5 has dropped out of the Xbox Live most played list, that has to say something about the quality of the game.
> > I’m not saying that the game’s quality is bad, but it is sub-par compared to other Halo games at their launches.
>
>
> I feel like the game developers are trying to make something new. I really don’t think they will go back to the old style games. Probably to compete with other newer games.
And this is exactly why theyre failing.
- You dont change an existing game formula that thousands of people love when you want to make something new. You make a new IP ffs.
- Halo isnt supposed to try to compete with other games by keeping up with what theyre doing. Its strength was always that it was vastly different from every other shooter.
Story wise im ready for it lol
I should have internet soon lol thts the only reason my rank is low. I can’t wait for warzone
> 2535455681930574;10:
> > some people are already talking about Halo 6 because they want to implement some changes in the formula that didn’t get done in Halo 5, like removing armor abilities, sprint, and some other stuff, to make the game more in line with the original games. I mean, Halo 5 has dropped out of the Xbox Live most played list, that has to say something about the quality of the game
>
> Every other game has sprint so halo won’t appeal to the fans of those games. Some of the fan base already left halo because of sprint but if they remove it in halo 6, halo will definitely die. What I’m trying to say is that sprint is actually helping halo instead of hurting it. For all you guys that think sprint is the apocalypse, they might add a classic playlist in halo 6. I’m sorry, but the original style of halo is gone. We live in an era where people like fast paced action and being able to quickly dash away. COD was never as fast as it is now and halo had to adapt to survive.
Because now is the best time to start telling them what we want. They’re already in the early stages of development, which means if they know something is important to the fans, they can lay the groundwork to implement it right away. If people waited they may end up at a point where it’s too late to implement important ideas.