> 2533274801973487;10:
> > 2533274931637595;7:
> > > 2533274836967617;6:
> > > I refuse to get excited for Battlefront III since EA are publishing it. I don’t trust them. Not even a tiny bit.
> >
> >
> > Same way I feel about 343 and ~ Microsoft Studios
>
>
> I had that conversation a few days ago…nothing will come out of it…
> But before 343-defence-force comes into play claiming EA is way more evil and 343 is an -Yoinking!- angel because EA game
>
>
> > B. Have an ending so bad that there is a patch for it
> > C. Riddled with microtransactions
>
>
>
> and 343 “fixed” MCC I would like to bring back my post:
>
>
> > Looking at the latest releases EA is one of the better publishers…Ubisoft screws up a lot of stuff latley, but the king of broken games still is the MCC, nothing to whitewash there! And i don’t care how many games are part of the collection, if I spent 60$/70€ on something I expect it to work, minor bugs are tolerable but MCC was a laughable release and its MS/343’s responsibility to notice this BEFORE release
> >
> > Halo 4 was a punsh into any Halo fans face: broken gameplay, missing features (fileshare, ranks).
> > Sure those are oppinons but it’s quite stupid that you say this oppinoins are invalid arguments but you choose oppinoins like an ending that you didn’t like or microtransactions (wich I would consider on par with H4’s broken gameplay) as an argument yourself…
> > So looking at major releases (H4, MCC) 343 has a 100% failure rate atm…
>
>
> https://www.halowaypoint.com/en-us/forums/6e35355aecdf4fd0acdaee3cc4156fd4/topics/i-m-on-a-budget-what-should-i-do/e51ce205-7cf3-4464-97c9-bf2b94a06b60/posts?page=2#post35
>
> @Anguirus
> Great work calling out that user in your poll…you must be really proud of yourself…
Here’s the difference between EA and 343i. MS forces the release of one of the most technologically complex games on the market out before it is ready and 343i then works tirelessly to bring it up to snuff, as well as providing a free campaign, a month of Live and a free map. They also gave us a free Forge space a year or so ago for Halo 4. MCC is now fixed, barring some smaller bugs.
EA, on the other hand, actively insults its fanbase by releasing games objectively worse than the previous one in every single conceivable way with provably fewer features and literally no new mechanics (Sims 4) and then expects the audience to continue purchasing via microstransactions, paid day one DLC, EA access/Origin, and so one, all so we can get the full game we pay $60 dollars for already.
Have you noticed the difference yet? When MS releases a broken game, 343i fixes it and gives out free content as compensation, despite said game being extremely complex; when EA releases a broken game, it doesn’t have the excuse of being a complex game; they fix it, apologize, then screw you over again by asking you to buy the rest of the game you already bought and paid for, and was broken anyway. One of them gives us free stuff. One of them expects us to spend more money. Out of those two, one of them released a major AAA game that was broken for over a year, while the other released a technologically more complex game that was broken for a few months at most, depending on who you ask. Guess which one released the year long broken game? EA and Battlefield 4.
So to claim that 343i and MS is somehow worse than EA is objectively wrong, and is in fact rather damaging for the game industry to allow personal biases get in the way of the actual problem.
Then of course you have the fact that EA treats its employees like crap and they have a very childish obsession over Battlefield; EA were the ones who started up this whole “Battlefield vs CoD” bull that we see fanboys screaming over when EA was actively smearing CoD and Activision during BF3 and 4’s lead up. and MS/343i are worse than that? Please.