343 will REALLY need to step up their game if they want to keep the Halo franchise alive. Halo Reach and 4 are really destroying peoples’ impressions about Halo, and it’s starting to do that to me, too. (I’ve tried countless times to try and enjoy H4 and try to make it feel like a Halo game, but it’s just not working. I din’t know if this is because of puberty or nostalgia but it’s REALLY bothering me that H4 doesn’t feel like a Halo game.) The soundtrack needs classic themes back and needs to sound less generic, the multiplayer can keep Infinity game modes but it has to have classic gametypes return and have more of them than Infinity gametypes. The campaign could travel to a bit more interesting places, but overall it’s great as it is. Customs will need to have all the past options return and add new ones and Forge needs a revamp. This is my opinion, but I’d also like to hear the community’s. So, without further ado…
> Halo 5 needs a beta to make sure maximum haloness can be achieved instead of this washed down version of halo
If I were a big shot-caller at 343i, a beta would be an absolute necessity, and there would definitely be one pre-launch. Halo 4 would have been so much better if they pushed the release date back for a beta.
Halo 5 will need a beta. And also ranks on launch, CoD has ranks for crying out loud!
Halo Reach and Halo 4 are strike 1 and strike 2 for the Halo franchise. I don’t think Halo can survive a 3rd hit and be relevant.
343i need to make up their mind wuth the next title. If they wanna walk in COD’s footsteps like they did in H4 they need to do it properly, not some half hearted, sad COD clone. Nobody likes a poor immitation.
Or, they need to go off the rails and go in their own direction, like COD originally did with Modern Warfare, which gave COD the leading position in the market.
It comes down to ‘ímmitate or innovate’. If they’re gonna immitate it better be the best COD clone on the market, but if they’re going to innovate they need to be bold and switch the WHOLE formula up. I suspect they’ll just stay in the middle and poop out a designed-by-committee game that compromises quality by trying to please everybody.
Gawd I HOPE I’m wrong, I want Halo to be the best again.
> Halo Reach and Halo 4 are strike 1 and strike 2 for the Halo franchise. I don’t think Halo can survive a 3rd hit and be relevant.
>
> 343i need to make up their mind wuth the next title. If they wanna walk in COD’s footsteps like they did in H4 they need to do it properly, not some half hearted, sad COD clone. Nobody likes a poor immitation.
>
> Or, they need to go off the rails and go in their own direction, like COD originally did with Modern Warfare, which gave COD the leading position in the market.
>
> It comes down to ‘ímmitate or innovate’. If they’re gonna immitate it better be the best COD clone on the market, but if they’re going to innovate they need to be bold and switch the WHOLE formula up. I suspect they’ll just stay in the middle and poop out a designed-by-committee game that compromises quality by trying to please everybody.
>
> Gawd I HOPE I’m wrong, I want Halo to be the best again.
> > No, Halo 4 is revitalizing the Halo series. Everyone though it would end with Bungie, but it didn’t.
>
> Dear god have mercy on this poor soul, for he has not thought of his words properly and I believe he should be spared to see how wrong he truly is
While I do look forward to seeing what H5 could rbing,that’s not exactly appropriate because he had a diffrent opinon from yours.
so long as it’s got somthing I might like I’ll look forward to it,but I don’t know what’s in store yet,so we’ll have to wait and see
