Are Taking someones tags Good or Bad?
Do Tags stay or move from Reach to Halo 5?
I think Halo Clan Tags are not good, people made them up to disbanned clans, they stayed in Reach
Explain what you mean by “taking tags”. Like how DHG tags were a thing for a while?
You assasinate someone, they can not join or create a halo clan. Its stupid
What in the world are you talking about. Taking someone’s account? That’s against Xbox ToS. Halo Clan Tags? Like whet.
> 2535416624261650;4:
> You assasinate someone, they can not join or create a halo clan. Its stupid
And…whats to stop them from doing it anyway and just basically blocking anyone who tells them they cant?
Or just shrugging and then going off and becoming a productive part of society?
Taking tags is a halo clan thing, if someone assassinated you can’t create or join a clan. I don’t listen to those try hards
<mark>This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not post comments that are discriminatory in nature.</mark>
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
Ah yes taking tags, I hear a lot about this on Facebook and remember a clan leader I was working for as a merc back on Reach, he took it so serious that it wasn’t even funny anymore just retarded. I’ve seen several of clan leaders get assassinated and still have big clans afterwards. Only those who participate in that stupid rule are the ones who take it serious, everyone else just bicker over raid rules, who won what, who’s a Spartan, etc. pretty much the Halo Clan Community has created their own virtual politics.
> 2535416624261650;7:
> Taking tags is a halo clan thing, if someone assassinated you can’t create or join a clan. I don’t listen to those try hards
So basically what I said earlier. Thought so.
its a UNSC Military clans thing, if you were assassinated you ( the current tag ) was declared kia and unusable, now most of these clans use canon names as gamer tags so losing a tag and finding a new was a pain in the -Yoink-. it’s a stupid system and I don’t think its followed actively anymore.