I would like some official (or at least informed consensus) clarification on whether or not a Youtube partner (partnered through the Yeousch network) can monetize footage of Halo 4.
I read the Game Content Usage Rules, which fairly clearly state that this is not allowed, but then I also read a quote from Frankie O’Connor of 343, who said:
"As I mentioned in the Halo community thread, these rules actually haven’t really changed, and even the updated and clarified text has been up there for months. I assume somebody just noticed this and posted this morning because it sort of blew up. This has always been the Legal status for the IP (and MOST IPs in fact), and as you also already know, nobody is being sued, or in jail, etc etc etc.
The language isn’t designed to stop kids streaming their games, or covering their costs, it’s designed to stop big companies from using somebody else’s IP to run a business.
We’ll put together some language that will help community people navigate this easily, and give people workarounds."
I’ve posted Halo 3 on my channel before with no issue, and, since the GCUR, according to O’Connor, “haven’t changed”, why has my Halo 3 not been taken down?
Am I a “big company” because I am part of Yeousch? Technically, I own my own business for tax purposes. Where is the line? I am primarily a PC gamer, so it’s not like Halo 4 will keep me - or Yeousch for that matter - afloat.
And what about Machinima? Machinima has a deal with -Yoink!-/343 that allows their partners to claim footage unimpeded. What’s up with that? O’Connor talks about limiting big companies, but then lets MS go out of their way to give exclusivity with a media giant? This is all so confusing and inconsistent.
I’m honestly half-tempted to just post, and since they’re not suing anyone, just counter-claim if it gets taken down since it wouldn’t be worth the cost of pursuing a lawsuit against me.
Seems a bit stupid to refuse free publicity anyhow.