> Awful survey.
>
> Open ended questions
> Makes assumptions
> Huge amount of bias with leading questions
>
> Didn’t do it.
I didn’t think the questions were too leading to be honest, perhaps question 7 and 4. Although, they are based on fact, the DMR is dominant and the ordnance is based on luck.
I filled it in as i like your initiative and some of the questions were ok.
However i think you should look into writing questionaires ( Theres quite alot of online resources; books , journals which i used during my degree that could help you word your questions better to give fairer and more accurate information).
If you do look into re writing it i would do it again. I think as it stands while interesting, your results wont hold too much weight higher up
You should create another survey, with more questions next time (other complaints from this forum), would be good to see what issues are most ‘gamebreaking’ and which are not for the community.
> However i think you should look into writing questionaires ( Theres quite alot of online resources; books , journals which i used during my degree that could help you word your questions better to give fairer and more accurate information).
I realise the questionnaire isn’t perfect by any means, nut I don’t have time to research writing questionnaires. I wrote this in under 15 mins and I think it addresses some of the key issues. Yes, some of the questions are a bit leading, but I don’t have ages to agonise over every one.
It sounds like you’re much more qualified than me, perhaps you could come up with a much more detailed and comprehensive survey, then if it’s really good we could try and get 343 eyeballs on it.
“Do you think 343 will listen to the community and implement a significant TU?”
Should have an option for ‘Unsure’ instead of just Yes/No.
It took me a while to decide, I chose Yes because I want to have some faith in 343i, but if there was an unsure option that’s definitely what I would have chosen as I’m on the fence until 343i prove otherwise
I think they should just make ordinance only be for AA’s and possibly ammo and that is all so that while we can go back to classic Halo where everyone spawns with the same stuff no AA’s and such we still have a flair of Halo 4 with Ordinance and its nearly perfected AA’s. Anyone agree we have to keep some of the stuff that make sit Halo 4 at the least why not make it like this ? please reply.
> I think question 10:
>
> “Do you think 343 will listen to the community and implement a significant TU?”
>
> Should have an option for ‘Unsure’ instead of just Yes/No.
>
> It took me a while to decide, I chose Yes because I want to have some faith in 343i, but if there was an unsure option that’s definitely what I would have chosen as I’m on the fence until 343i prove otherwise
I hope that everyone knows that theres 2 TU’s comeing so while the first may not be waht everyone asked for theres still more of a chance for the second. I belive that 343 is going to bring out the main things people have been asking for the longest ( prefered gamemodes, fileshare, ranking , and bug/ glitch fixes) and then on the second one it will probably be like changes to overalll gameplay IF and only If they are listening or if we make them listen that is.
> I think question 10:
>
> “Do you think 343 will listen to the community and implement a significant TU?”
>
> Should have an option for ‘Unsure’ instead of just Yes/No.
>
> It took me a while to decide, I chose Yes because I want to have some faith in 343i, but if there was an unsure option that’s definitely what I would have chosen as I’m on the fence until 343i prove otherwise
I purposely left off unsure. Everyone is unsure what 343 are going to do. I want to know what your gut feeling is.