it has come to my attention upon reading th gameinformer on halo 4 that 343 has indefinately ruined matchmaking for halo. it is too much like call of duty and battlefield. we want to play the old matchmaking from halo 3. well not the exact same but at least close. if we want to play games like call of duty or battlefield we should just play those games and be let down by yet another halo game. halo reach was corrupted by loadoats thats why more people stop playing and gave up on halo as a whole. who agrees?
The game hasn’t came out yet so you can not possibly judge what it sounds like, especially after 343i have said a lot of things said in that GI article was incorrect or has changed since.
However, if you do truly want Halo 3, it is still online for playing.
lol really? Reach was, “corrupted” by Loadouts? It’s the sole reason people would stop playing it?
> it has come to my attention upon reading th gameinformer on halo 4 that 343 has indefinately ruined matchmaking for halo. it is too much like call of duty and battlefield. we want to play the old matchmaking from halo 3. well not the exact same but at least close. if we want to play games like call of duty or battlefield we should just play those games and be let down by yet another halo game. halo reach was corrupted by loadoats thats why more people stop playing and gave up on halo as a whole. who agrees?
Your English as written is terrible, you’re in the wrong forum, you make claims about a game not yet seen, you mistate the state of Reach, and you express a personal opinion as though it were a generally agreed upon truth. Other than that… well, there is no other than that.
Edit: Well, at least it’s now been moved to the right forum.
It does look like 343i is copying the likes of CoD or Battlefield BUT Frank (was it Frank?) announced that they are not just copying from games like CoD. Honestly though, I think Halo needs a new, fresh start but I wouldn’t worry. A classic playlist will more than likely be added if the new additions don’t suit your needs.
BUT this is Halo 4, not Halo 3 Anniversary…
Those who have not played a game have no right to judge it.
> Those who have not played a game have no right to judge it.
I completely agree
Cool time machine OP. Can i borrow it?
Made some mistakes a few years back id love to fix.
> Those who have not played a game have no right to judge it.
I hate to disagree, but I do. First of all, you can judge a game if you have enough information to do so without playing it, as by watching it being played. Secondly, even if you don’t have any valid information, you still have the right to judge it, it’s just that your judgment is likely to be an expression of unfounded bias not worth expressing.
All of my friends use to play Halo 2 and Halo 3 and were huge fans of the Halo franchise. When Reach came out they all bought it and we played it but every single one of them quit because of the changes that were made to it. They sold Reach and moved on to other game franchises. Now that Armour abilities are returning and they’re changing it even more I don’t like the way it is looking. Obviously though the game isn’t out yet so I don’t know if it will work out but it certainly doesn’t look that way at least to me.
Threads like these make me think “Oh Please”.
Doesn’t this belong in the Halo 4 section?
> Doesn’t this belong in the Halo 4 section?
OH DAMM! Oh well, what’s done is done. I was just trying to raise a point sorry:(