Halo 4 has the better ratings and review (Machinima, IGN, gamespot etc etc etc) than -Yoink- ops 2.
Just let you guys know 
Off topic - When are 343 going to add more variants in big team? Such as 1 flag, TU slayer, Team snipers, 2 Flag and the others in Halo 3 and Reach.
Metacritic says they have the same, an 87, which are both only “good”.
> Metacritic says they have the same, an 87, which are both only “good”.
Metacritic takes in account reviews from people who give Halo a 5/10 because you can’t aim down the iron sights…
> > Metacritic says they have the same, an 87, which are both only “good”.
>
> Metacritic takes in account reviews from people who give Halo a 5/10 because you can’t aim down the iron sights…
And IGN gave halo CEA a 9.7 after 343 downgraded the game by taking out multiplayer.
Apparently mulitplayer, which is at least HALF of what halo is, is worth 3% of a game’s total worth, according to IGN.
Also didn’t halo 2/3 both get 95/94 on metacritic? Apparently it can’t be that off…
BLOPS 2 isn’t bad.
Ratings honestly don’t matter. But we know that so I’ll continue.
Black Ops 2 looks different from previous Call of Duty’s, and the whole story changing thing seems interesting. In terms of campaign, however, the gameplay will undoubtedly suck. Once again it will be just murdering waves upon waves of the same enemy over and over again as you make your way through some city.
Multiplayer and zombies, though different, seem ok, but I’m not getting the game.