Hello! me and my friend found an easter egg in Halo 4, on one of the forge peices “Ravine > Artifact Base” you can see part of Halo 3 level Tsavo Highway. enjoy!
You call it an easter egg, I see a lazily re-used reflection map. That’s like saying the auntie-dot loading display on player cards is an easter egg of reach instead of just a re-used animation.
> You call it an easter egg, I see a lazily re-used reflection map. That’s like saying the auntie-dot loading display on player cards is an easter egg of reach instead of just a re-used animation.
Whats your point? you are the only person “atm” who has a problem with us calling it an “Easter Egg” yet everyone else seems to be fine with it.
And besides, who are you to say what is or isnt an “Easter Egg”? you have no proof that it aint.
> > You call it an easter egg, I see a lazily re-used reflection map. That’s like saying the auntie-dot loading display on player cards is an easter egg of reach instead of just a re-used animation.
>
> Whats your point? you are the only person “atm” who has a problem with us calling it an “Easter Egg” yet everyone else seems to be fine with it.
>
> And besides, who are you to say what is or isnt an “Easter Egg”? you have no proof that it aint.
> You call it an easter egg, I see a lazily re-used reflection map. That’s like saying the auntie-dot loading display on player cards is an easter egg of reach instead of just a re-used animation.
I never noticed that!
Seriously, how did this game take almost 4 years to make? Is that counting the time spent on bits taken from other games during their development cycle?
> > > You call it an easter egg, I see a lazily re-used reflection map. That’s like saying the auntie-dot loading display on player cards is an easter egg of reach instead of just a re-used animation.
> >
> > Whats your point? you are the only person “atm” who has a problem with us calling it an “Easter Egg” yet everyone else seems to be fine with it.
> >
> > And besides, who are you to say what is or isnt an “Easter Egg”? you have no proof that it aint.
>
> Aint is not a word.