So i’ve come to terms with not having 1-50 ranks. But will there at least be something for the comptetive halo player? And not this “get exp get rank” crap.
Yeah I hope theres Competitive Xp just tells you how much a persons played and I enjoyed Halo2 and Halo3’s Ranking ideas.
No offense, but is beating the other team not enough for a “competitive” Halo player?
> No offense, but is beating the other team not enough for a “competitive” Halo player?
Yes, but what about rank that separates the good players from the bad?
The thing about halo 3 and halo 2 was that you would work with your friends and actually really focus on winning to get ranks which was fun. Without that multiplayer can get borring as people don’t take it seriously.
> The thing about halo 3 and halo 2 was that you would work with your friends and actually really focus on winning to get ranks which was fun. Without that multiplayer can get borring as people don’t take it seriously.
Exactly.
> No offense, but is beating the other team not enough for a “competitive” Halo player?
Isn’t playing the game enough to be fun? Why do you need to be rewarded for experience?
Ah. Well, in that case, which of the previous Halo iterations shipped without a competitive multiplayer rank system?
> Ah. Well, in that case, which of the previous Halo iterations shipped without a competitive multiplayer rank system?
Reach? Im a major, and I beat legend,hero, reclaimer all the time. Shouldn’t they(by rank) be better than me? This is reach:" well you won a game heres some exp,and you need exp to get that rank up. we’re not gonna separate you from the rest, we’re just gonna keep putting you against bad players."
I liked 1-50 except for the fact that I was a 50 all 6 playlists so I couldn’t play with my friends who couldn’t do good in a 50 high ranked game, no fun for them, no fun for me… and I want to be able to play doubles and snipers and “ranked only playlists” with my friends…
> No offense, but is beating the other team not enough for a “competitive” Halo player?
No
I don’t know why it seems to be acceptable to just say competitive players should be ok with just playing the game but casual players should have exp, and weapon unlocks and perks and hundreds of millions of progressions systems.
It’s ridiculously bias.
> I liked 1-50 except for the fact that I was a 50 all 6 playlists so I couldn’t play with my friends who couldn’t do good in a 50 high ranked game, no fun for them, no fun for me… and I want to be able to play doubles and snipers and “ranked only playlists” with my friends…
1-50 isnt coming back it’s already been confirmed. I just hope they have something good in the works as far as matchmaking goes.
> > No offense, but is beating the other team not enough for a “competitive” Halo player?
>
> No
>
> I don’t know why it seems to be acceptable to just say competitive players should be ok with just playing the game but casual players should have exp, and weapon unlocks and perks and hundreds of millions of progressions systems.
>
> It’s ridiculously bias.
Thank you!
> > I liked 1-50 except for the fact that I was a 50 all 6 playlists so I couldn’t play with my friends who couldn’t do good in a 50 high ranked game, no fun for them, no fun for me… and I want to be able to play doubles and snipers and “ranked only playlists” with my friends…
>
> 1-50 isnt coming back it’s already been confirmed. I just hope they have something good in the works as far as matchmaking goes.
I know it isn’t coming back… just saying what worked with it (made me feel like a beast having a 50 ^^) and what didn’t work, I actually… am ok with it being gone as long as the matchmaking isn’t broken like in reach
If we get a INVISIBLE RANKING system im going to be very upset and maybe even cry
But yes there’s going to be a Ranking system with some kind of Ranked playlists that will hopefully find competitive games
> If we get a INVISIBLE RANKING system im going to be very upset and maybe even cry
>
>
> But yes there’s going to be a Ranking system with some kind of Ranked playlists that will hopefully find competitive games
We have an invisible one what’s the point lol but hearing that some ranking will be H4 is SOMEWHAT good to hear
> No offense, but is beating the other team not enough for a “competitive” Halo player?
In Reach, it was enough for me. Though I don’t prefer having a lacking ranking system that doesn’t match people accordingly.
Has it been confirmed there wont be a 1-50?
> Has it been confirmed there wont be a 1-50?
Unfortunately 
All i want is a ranking system that is based off of winning. This is a team based competitive fps and therefore you should be rewarded for winning. The everyone gets credits crap is lame if it applies to every playlist.
An invisible ranking system is probably the worst alternative 343 can come up with.
I love 343, and I believe they’re extremely creative and very talented, but this is just not the answer.