Aren’t u tired of everyone saying “Halo needs to go back like it was on 3?”. Halo reach was way better in my opinion. The only thing I liked about 3 were the map and ranking system. As far as matchmaking gameplay, Reach ups 3 in every way possible. People only playing for days or weeks at a time, then saying “reach is garbage” those are the ones who couldn’t adapt. Say what u want about Reach, I love it!
For sure.Halo 3 looked and felt little different from the original Xbox Halos not that its a bad thing.Reach was the first one that really felt next gen to me.Not to mention Reach doesnt have a stage that looks like the inside of the end of the digestive system lol.
To me, Halo Reach had a way better campaign, and community options (introduction of the filebrowser) and Reach made Elites look menacing and different from Spartans. Halo 3, however, had a better multiplayer, along with its custom games, weapons and vehicles, and gameplay, it was great.
Both games are really fantastic additions to the Halo Franchise.
> Aren’t u tired of everyone saying “Halo needs to go back like it was on 3?”. Halo reach was way better in my opinion. The only thing I liked about 3 were the map and ranking system. As far as matchmaking gameplay, Reach ups 3 in every way possible. People only playing for days or weeks at a time, then saying “reach is garbage” those are the ones who couldn’t adapt. Say what u want about Reach, I love it!
I don’t think you played enough Reach yet… Garbage, no. I love it but I find myself popping in Halo 3. Reach has better forge and custom games… But when I want a decent online match I need to get on Halo 3.
Halo Reach multiplayer, the moment things get fierce it all boils down to AA spam. Except in Arena/ pro slayer/ or MLG
Halo 3 was way better, and I dominate in Reach because its too damn easy, and im not even that good.
But that Halo 2… R.I.P
and by the way, people mean Halo 3 as in the simple style arena game. Reach is Reach to me, Halo 3/2 are Halo games to me. So when people do say “go back to Halo 3”, I do. I want a new halo game, not a new Reach game.
Halo 2 was completely broken and Halo 3 was Halo 2 but everything made worse. There is nothing I like more in Halo 3 than in any other Halo game… Halo: Reach feels great, it brought things back from Halo: CE, which was a really good choiche. But it’s everyone’s own opinion, I love Halo: Reach and it will always be my favourite multiplayer game.
Reach is better than 3, but not 4.
Reach and Halo 3 both have great Multiplayer. Halo 3 is just considered most competitive because of skill. But to be honest, I hated playing Multiplayer on Halo 3. I live in Australia and I would almost lag in every game, not fun.
Halo 3 had far better maps than Reach, and the best campaign of all the saga.
I understand perfectly that many people hate AA because they destroy the traditional gameplay, however, IMO, they add a new dimension to the game (I also think the armor lock is overpowered).
Many other complaints are about vehicles. I am a vehicle lover, but I support the decision of making them weaker to weapons. In 3, I had the feeling of being harmless when there was an enemy Warthog surrounding our base, and we didn’t have powerful weapons. And I am saying this as someone who likes driving the Warthog in Hemorrhage (and running away from sniper shots).
About Forge, there’s not much to say, Reach is a huge step in this issue.
The perfect Halo for me would have Reach gameplay, but H3 maps. I am truly disappointed with H4, but if the solution were getting rid of all AA, and return to H3, no doubt, I’d choose 3.