Well it’s no surprise that well classic Halo is dead, I constantly see forums and people saying “343 sucks, sprint equals no Halo” etc. Well guys we just have to acknowledge that this Halo will always be dead, there is no bringing it back. The newer Halos as a result have definitely changed starting with Reach. Change isnt bad guys, now I have people may not like Halo 5, 4, for multiple reasons. They don’t like the gameplay, don’t like the launch of H5 and still how it is. We need to grow up along with Halo. Im not saying H5 and 4 are the best or even proper evolution of how Halo should’ve transformed but it’s not terrible or bad. Halo 4, guys most underrated game ever, I didn’t really like the gameplay but it was a really good Halo game despite the gameplay. Right now I find so much haters right now on the forums, you really think 343 wants to read something that says “343 care more about money”? Of course not! And I know people say hating or whatever helps 343 let them know what is bad or terrible, but we also need to show some positivity. We need to let them know what is wrong and bad, but we also need to let them know what is good. Right now, H4 is arguably the best story the Halo Franchise has had. Do you remember when it launched, how people said it was sh*t and all? I am absolutely sure that that is why H5 came out the way it did. We need to balance the positivity and negativey so they know what they are doing wrong and right. Overall, we need to be more accepting of the games coming out if not, im pretty sure every older franchise would’ve been dead by now! If you don’t like the new Halos because of the gameplay, people say how modern it is, other first person shooter s out there are accused to be “modern”. So if you don’t like the newer Halos modern gameplay, what game do you like? Have you just simply moved away from fps games? Is the fact that the newer Halos arent as unique as you may say, there is no other game that plays like H Reach, or Halo 5. Maybe you just don’t like because it has the Halo title on it. Well let me tell you something are you not going to like a game because it has some words on it? That’s insane. Now im not trying to say the new Halos are absolutely golden they are perfect but as a whole we need to be more accepting. Would you like Halo 6 if it had good customization, good U.I, great amount of content, and good solid gameplay? Would you hate Halo 6 just because it has the Halo title on it? If you were to erase “Halo” from the title (an example) and have 6 Bring Down The Robots, would you like this game? Do you come into the new Halo game with the mindset of it has to have this type of gameplay and mechanics or do you come into it with, I just want a fund good game?
> 2533274882271122;1:
> Well it’s no surprise that well classic Halo is dead, I constantly see forums and people saying “343 sucks, sprint equals no Halo” etc. Well guys we just have to acknowledge that this Halo will always be dead, there is no bringing it back. The newer Halos as a result have definitely changed starting with Reach. Change isnt bad guys, now I have people may not like Halo 5, 4, for multiple reasons. They don’t like the gameplay, don’t like the launch of H5 and still how it is. We need to grow up along with Halo. Im not saying H5 and 4 are the best or even proper evolution of how Halo should’ve transformed but it’s not terrible or bad. Halo 4, guys most underrated game ever, I didn’t really like the gameplay but it was a really good Halo game despite the gameplay. Right now I find so much haters right now on the forums, you really think 343 wants to read something that says “343 care more about money”? Of course not! And I know people say hating or whatever helps 343 let them know what is bad or terrible, but we also need to show some positivity. We need to let them know what is wrong and bad, but we also need to let them know what is good. Right now, H4 is arguably the best story the Halo Franchise has had. Do you remember when it launched, how people said it was sh*t and all? I am absolutely sure that that is why H5 came out the way it did. We need to balance the positivity and negativey so they know what they are doing wrong and right. Overall, we need to be more accepting of the games coming out if not, im pretty sure every older franchise would’ve been dead by now! If you don’t like the new Halos because of the gameplay, people say how modern it is, other first person shooter s out there are accused to be “modern”. So if you don’t like the newer Halos modern gameplay, what game do you like? Have you just simply moved away from fps games? Is the fact that the newer Halos arent as unique as you may say, there is no other game that plays like H Reach, or Halo 5. Maybe you just don’t like because it has the Halo title on it. Well let me tell you something are you not going to like a game because it has some words on it? That’s insane. Now im not trying to say the new Halos are absolutely golden they are perfect but as a whole we need to be more accepting. Would you like Halo 6 if it had good customization, good U.I, great amount of content, and good solid gameplay? Would you hate Halo 6 just because it has the Halo title on it? If you were to erase “Halo” from the title (an example) and have 6 Bring Down The Robots, would you like this game? Do you come into the new Halo game with the mindset of it has to have this type of gameplay and mechanics or do you come into it with, I just want a fund good game?
I’m not gonna be positive for the sake of being positive…the campaign in halo 5 sucked,micro transactions really don’t belong in halo as well as Spartan charge or ground pound…if me and many others have a problem with halo 5 and your precious 343 we are going to let it be known and we’re not gonna be happy about this dumpster fire
> 2533274830166194;2:
> > 2533274882271122;1:
> > Well it’s no surprise that well classic Halo is dead, I constantly see forums and people saying “343 sucks, sprint equals no Halo” etc. Well guys we just have to acknowledge that this Halo will always be dead, there is no bringing it back. The newer Halos as a result have definitely changed starting with Reach. Change isnt bad guys, now I have people may not like Halo 5, 4, for multiple reasons. They don’t like the gameplay, don’t like the launch of H5 and still how it is. We need to grow up along with Halo. Im not saying H5 and 4 are the best or even proper evolution of how Halo should’ve transformed but it’s not terrible or bad. Halo 4, guys most underrated game ever, I didn’t really like the gameplay but it was a really good Halo game despite the gameplay. Right now I find so much haters right now on the forums, you really think 343 wants to read something that says “343 care more about money”? Of course not! And I know people say hating or whatever helps 343 let them know what is bad or terrible, but we also need to show some positivity. We need to let them know what is wrong and bad, but we also need to let them know what is good. Right now, H4 is arguably the best story the Halo Franchise has had. Do you remember when it launched, how people said it was sh*t and all? I am absolutely sure that that is why H5 came out the way it did. We need to balance the positivity and negativey so they know what they are doing wrong and right. Overall, we need to be more accepting of the games coming out if not, im pretty sure every older franchise would’ve been dead by now! If you don’t like the new Halos because of the gameplay, people say how modern it is, other first person shooter s out there are accused to be “modern”. So if you don’t like the newer Halos modern gameplay, what game do you like? Have you just simply moved away from fps games? Is the fact that the newer Halos arent as unique as you may say, there is no other game that plays like H Reach, or Halo 5. Maybe you just don’t like because it has the Halo title on it. Well let me tell you something are you not going to like a game because it has some words on it? That’s insane. Now im not trying to say the new Halos are absolutely golden they are perfect but as a whole we need to be more accepting. Would you like Halo 6 if it had good customization, good U.I, great amount of content, and good solid gameplay? Would you hate Halo 6 just because it has the Halo title on it? If you were to erase “Halo” from the title (an example) and have 6 Bring Down The Robots, would you like this game? Do you come into the new Halo game with the mindset of it has to have this type of gameplay and mechanics or do you come into it with, I just want a fund good game?
>
>
> I’m not gonna be positive for the sake of being positive…the campaign in halo 5 sucked,micro transactions really don’t belong in halo as well as Spartan charge or ground pound…if me and many others have a problem with halo 5 and your precious 343 we are going to let it be known and we’re not gonna be happy about this dumpster fire
I don’t want to sound so rude but you’re not going to point out the positives when there are some? That is so stupid! Yes you’re right, the campaign sucked, micro$ aren’t that good for a game in my opinion. Same with Spartan Charge and Ground Pound. And that’s great you’re letting them know about these things but they are still some positives we need to add so they don’t think everything is sh*t when it’s not. Hell, I can think of some right now, great Forge, assassinations and stances are all good customization that only gives the players options, weapons are fairly balanced, however some weapons should definitely have the ttk reduced (specifically the automatics). I wasn’t saying to not let the problems be known, I was just saying to be a little more accepting and to say what is stupid, but to also say what they did good so they can put that in the next game. “My precious 343” you think I’m some 343 fanboy? I’m just being a reasonable person here.
> 2533274882271122;3:
> > 2533274830166194;2:
> > > 2533274882271122;1:
> > > Well it’s no surprise that well classic Halo is dead, I constantly see forums and people saying “343 sucks, sprint equals no Halo” etc. Well guys we just have to acknowledge that this Halo will always be dead, there is no bringing it back. The newer Halos as a result have definitely changed starting with Reach. Change isnt bad guys, now I have people may not like Halo 5, 4, for multiple reasons. They don’t like the gameplay, don’t like the launch of H5 and still how it is. We need to grow up along with Halo. Im not saying H5 and 4 are the best or even proper evolution of how Halo should’ve transformed but it’s not terrible or bad. Halo 4, guys most underrated game ever, I didn’t really like the gameplay but it was a really good Halo game despite the gameplay. Right now I find so much haters right now on the forums, you really think 343 wants to read something that says “343 care more about money”? Of course not! And I know people say hating or whatever helps 343 let them know what is bad or terrible, but we also need to show some positivity. We need to let them know what is wrong and bad, but we also need to let them know what is good. Right now, H4 is arguably the best story the Halo Franchise has had. Do you remember when it launched, how people said it was sht and all? I am absolutely sure that that is why H5 came out the way it did. We need to balance the positivity and negativey so they know what they are doing wrong and right. Overall, we need to be more accepting of the games coming out if not, im pretty sure every older franchise would’ve been dead by now! If you don’t like the new Halos because of the gameplay, people say how modern it is, other first person shooter s out there are accused to be “modern”. So if you don’t like the newer Halos modern gameplay, what game do you like? Have you just simply moved away from fps games? Is the fact that the newer Halos arent as unique as you may say, there is no other game that plays like H Reach, or Halo 5. Maybe you just don’t like because it has the Halo title on it. Well let me tell you something are you not going to like a game because it has some words on it? That’s insane. Now im not trying to say the new Halos are absolutely golden they are perfect but as a whole we need to be more accepting. Would you like Halo 6 if it had good customization, good U.I, great amount of content, and good solid gameplay? Would you hate Halo 6 just because it has the Halo title on it? If you were to erase “Halo” from the title (an example) and have 6 Bring Down The Robots, would you like this game? Do you come into the new Halo game with the mindset of it has to have this type of gameplay and mechanics or do you come into it with, I just want a fund good game?
> >
> >
> > I’m not gonna be positive for the sake of being positive…the campaign in halo 5 sucked,micro transactions really don’t belong in halo as well as Spartan charge or ground pound…if me and many others have a problem with halo 5 and your precious 343 we are going to let it be known and we’re not gonna be happy about this dumpster fire
>
>
> I don’t want to sound so rude but you’re not going to point out the positives when there are some? That is so stupid! Yes you’re right, the campaign sucked, micro$ aren’t that good for a game in my opinion. Same with Spartan Charge and Ground Pound. And that’s great you’re letting them know about these things but they are still some positives we need to add so they don’t think everything is sht when it’s not. Hell, I can think of some right now, great Forge, assassinations and stances are all good customization that only gives the players options, weapons are fairly balanced, however some weapons should definitely have the ttk reduced (specifically the automatics). I wasn’t saying to not let the problems be known, I was just saying to be a little more accepting and to say what is stupid, but to also say what they did good so they can put that in the next game. “My precious 343” you think I’m some 343 fanboy? I’m just being a reasonable person here.
U want me to point out what I feel are positives ok then…we go to sanghelios,going down the Guardian with osiris,clamber,arbiters back…that’s basically all I’m positive about with halo 5,I would list blue team if they had more missions and character development
> 2533274882271122;3:
> > 2533274830166194;2:
> > > 2533274882271122;1:
> > > Well it’s no surprise that well classic Halo is dead, I constantly see forums and people saying “343 sucks, sprint equals no Halo” etc. Well guys we just have to acknowledge that this Halo will always be dead, there is no bringing it back. The newer Halos as a result have definitely changed starting with Reach. Change isnt bad guys, now I have people may not like Halo 5, 4, for multiple reasons. They don’t like the gameplay, don’t like the launch of H5 and still how it is. We need to grow up along with Halo. Im not saying H5 and 4 are the best or even proper evolution of how Halo should’ve transformed but it’s not terrible or bad. Halo 4, guys most underrated game ever, I didn’t really like the gameplay but it was a really good Halo game despite the gameplay. Right now I find so much haters right now on the forums, you really think 343 wants to read something that says “343 care more about money”? Of course not! And I know people say hating or whatever helps 343 let them know what is bad or terrible, but we also need to show some positivity. We need to let them know what is wrong and bad, but we also need to let them know what is good. Right now, H4 is arguably the best story the Halo Franchise has had. Do you remember when it launched, how people said it was sht and all? I am absolutely sure that that is why H5 came out the way it did. We need to balance the positivity and negativey so they know what they are doing wrong and right. Overall, we need to be more accepting of the games coming out if not, im pretty sure every older franchise would’ve been dead by now! If you don’t like the new Halos because of the gameplay, people say how modern it is, other first person shooter s out there are accused to be “modern”. So if you don’t like the newer Halos modern gameplay, what game do you like? Have you just simply moved away from fps games? Is the fact that the newer Halos arent as unique as you may say, there is no other game that plays like H Reach, or Halo 5. Maybe you just don’t like because it has the Halo title on it. Well let me tell you something are you not going to like a game because it has some words on it? That’s insane. Now im not trying to say the new Halos are absolutely golden they are perfect but as a whole we need to be more accepting. Would you like Halo 6 if it had good customization, good U.I, great amount of content, and good solid gameplay? Would you hate Halo 6 just because it has the Halo title on it? If you were to erase “Halo” from the title (an example) and have 6 Bring Down The Robots, would you like this game? Do you come into the new Halo game with the mindset of it has to have this type of gameplay and mechanics or do you come into it with, I just want a fund good game?
> >
> >
> > I’m not gonna be positive for the sake of being positive…the campaign in halo 5 sucked,micro transactions really don’t belong in halo as well as Spartan charge or ground pound…if me and many others have a problem with halo 5 and your precious 343 we are going to let it be known and we’re not gonna be happy about this dumpster fire
>
>
> I don’t want to sound so rude but you’re not going to point out the positives when there are some? That is so stupid! Yes you’re right, the campaign sucked, micro$ aren’t that good for a game in my opinion. Same with Spartan Charge and Ground Pound. And that’s great you’re letting them know about these things but they are still some positives we need to add so they don’t think everything is sht when it’s not. Hell, I can think of some right now, great Forge, assassinations and stances are all good customization that only gives the players options, weapons are fairly balanced, however some weapons should definitely have the ttk reduced (specifically the automatics). I wasn’t saying to not let the problems be known, I was just saying to be a little more accepting and to say what is stupid, but to also say what they did good so they can put that in the next game. “My precious 343” you think I’m some 343 fanboy? I’m just being a reasonable person here.
And it’s hard to point out the few positives when there is a massive amount of negatives…I’m assuming u have heard the term if it ain’t broke don’t fix it,well imo that basically sums up 343…they imo change and add things just because they can and not because they should…prime examples would be the sword of Sanghelios elite design and making wzff instead of just classic firefight and making a wasp when alot of people wanted either the hornet or falcon
I can agree to some extent, however about the Falcon, how would they make that work? I can see a hornet being in Warzone, but a Falcon might be a little too easy to take out. Be cool if we had all 3 H6. Yeah that seems to be the problem with 343, I actually think H6 could be a really good game, this next Halo game will be very important for the franchise, which is part of the reason I’m making these threads, Negativity and Positivity.
As someone who went online for the first time during the 343-era in May 2016, I could honestly care a little less about the Bungie-era Halo games. Granted, I have grown up with the Bungie-era games up until Halo 3 and I respect them for what they brought to the table. But we’re moving forward. I can also overlook 343’s shortcomings with relative ease, but some problems could’ve been addressed. I’m personally quite accustomed to the new gameplay mechanics (including Sprint), though I admit Spartan Charge is gimmicky and annoying - I never took the “golden triangle” concept very seriously, and I still don’t even now. I can live with the REQ system as if it were a neighbor, albeit a rather demanding and annoying neighbor. Sure it’s going to be a long and grueling period getting used to it, but I can manage. Some of the items I get may be ugly and repetitive, but any items I get that are good - are good.
In terms of REQs, I still need to unlock the following:
- 10 helmets (excluding Challenger and Athlon Champion; Achilles is essentially guaranteed if you’re in a company - if you work your -Yoink- off) - 12 chestplates (also excluding Challenger and Athlon Champion) - Prophets’ Bane - Phaeton HeliosSo as a fellow Halo player at best, and a 343 fanboy at worst, I respect the Bungie-era Halos, but the classic days of those games are gone. 343 has taken the helm, and we are hopeless to stop it.
I guess I could be feeling the same thing. I grew up around the earlier Halo games and when I played them I got yelled at! I used to literally watch my brother play and then he would yell at me. So I mean I was a Halo fan in some way, and Halo 5 was my game, the game that came out when well I had my Xbox One and Halo 5. And I like the gameplay and gunplay of H5 and you can’t deny that it works. The gameplay is smooth, despite the bugs. It could just be me but I’m a person that can accept change, if i were to move away from my house and live some other place whether it be worse or better, I can move on and accept the change. But that can just be me
Most people who criticize 343i and the changes that they have made to Halo do so because they see these changes as being bad for the series. They don’t do it because they want Halo to never change, but because they see the majority of how it has changed as bad. 343i’s Halo games are simply not as good as the games that came before them. Whether it be because of mechanics that were thrown away, or changed into something else, or simply content that was abandoned for untested ideas, Halo 4, Halo 5 and TMCC are simply not very good games.
> 2533274882271122;1:
> you really think 343 wants to read something that says “343 care more about money”? Of course not!
Perhaps those at 343i Don’t want to read a bunch of posts that accuse them of only caring about money, but the reality of it is that’s exactly how it appears. There’s plenty of evidence to substantiate it(e.g. Releasing TMCC unfinished and broken, Mainstay features thrown out in Halo 4 and Halo 5, bloated RNG-Macrotransaction system in Halo 5, re-skinned DLC, and so-on). If 343i doesn’t like what people say about them and their motives, then they need to take steps to change the perceptions that they have created.
> 2533274882271122;1:
> Right now, H4 is arguably the best story the Halo Franchise has had.
Arguably, yes, because that is your opinion. A lot of people didn’t and don’t think Halo 4’s story was good, and that hasn’t changed much with time.
> 2533274882271122;1:
> So if you don’t like the newer Halos modern gameplay, what game do you like?
Halo had remained popular for a long time, even in the face of other popular FPS games, because it maintained a core structure that set it apart. The point when Halo started to lose ground was when it began to copy what every other FPS was doing.
> 2533274882271122;1:
> Maybe you just don’t like because it has the Halo title on it.
The fact that a Halo game should have Halo in it’s title has often meant that there is a certain level of quality expected from it. By themselves, Halo 4 and Halo 5 are not very good games. They’re mostly just decent. No rational person should base their assessment of a game’s quality on the words that are used in it’s title.
> 2533274882271122;1:
> Do you come into the new Halo game with the mindset of it has to have this type of gameplay and mechanics or do you come into it with, I just want a fund good game?
I think most people pick up and play Halo games because they want to play a good game, but also want to experience a bit of the nostalgia of an old game in the form a new one. That is something that, I think many have not gotten from 343i’s Halo.
> 2533274865178253;9:
> Most people who criticize 343i and the changes that they have made to Halo do so because they see these changes as being bad for the series. They don’t do it because they want Halo to never change, but because they see the majority of how it has changed as bad. 343i’s Halo games are simply not as good as the games that came before them. Whether it be because of mechanics that were thrown away, or changed into something else, or simply content that was abandoned for untested ideas, Halo 4, Halo 5 and TMCC are simply not very good games.
>
>
>
>
> > 2533274882271122;1:
> > you really think 343 wants to read something that says “343 care more about money”? Of course not!
>
>
> Perhaps those at 343i Don’t want to read a bunch of posts that accuse them of only caring about money, but the reality of it is that’s exactly how it appears. There’s plenty of evidence to substantiate it(e.g. Releasing TMCC unfinished and broken, Mainstay features thrown out in Halo 4 and Halo 5, bloated RNG-Macrotransaction system in Halo 5, re-skinned DLC, and so-on). If 343i doesn’t like what people say about them and their motives, then they need to take steps to change the perceptions that they have created.
>
>
>
>
> > 2533274882271122;1:
> > Right now, H4 is arguably the best story the Halo Franchise has had.
>
>
> Arguably, yes, because that is your opinion. A lot of people didn’t and don’t think Halo 4’s story was good, and that hasn’t changed much with time.
>
>
>
>
> > 2533274882271122;1:
> > So if you don’t like the newer Halos modern gameplay, what game do you like?
>
>
> Halo had remained popular for a long time, even in the face of other popular FPS games, because it maintained a core structure that set it apart. The point when Halo started to lose ground was when it began to copy what every other FPS was doing.
>
>
>
>
> > 2533274882271122;1:
> > Maybe you just don’t like because it has the Halo title on it.
>
>
> The fact that a Halo game should have Halo in it’s title has often meant that there is a certain level of quality expected from it. By themselves, Halo 4 and Halo 5 are not very good games. They’re mostly just decent. No rational person should base their assessment of a game’s quality on the words that are used in it’s title.
>
>
>
>
> > 2533274882271122;1:
> > Do you come into the new Halo game with the mindset of it has to have this type of gameplay and mechanics or do you come into it with, I just want a fund good game?
>
>
> I think most people pick up and play Halo games because they want to play a good game, but also want to experience a bit of the nostalgia of an old game in the form a new one. That is something that, I think many have not gotten from 343i’s Halo.
Yeah that’s true about the Halo title. When you buy a game that came from the same franchise, you have to expect something from that game. And Halo 5 simply didn’t reach that expectation that should be of a Halo game, and still hasn’t. But games like H4, it had your Oddball, KOTH, Slayer, Daily, Monthly, challenges, a good story, good customization with a real unlock system. Yeah the gameplay sucked, but it was what a Halo game should have and people rejected it. Instead of people noting all these positives, they listed only negative things which I’m absolutely sure a played a role in why Halo 5 launched shtty. Doesn’t make it ok of course but we as a community can’t just say H4 is trash, because that doesn’t help the devs in any way. The thing that makes wonder though is if H5 launched with everything Halo 3 or Reach launched with would people like this game. Would people hate it because of how it plays? It may not be as unique but is still definitely unique, you just can’t play a game that plays like H5 or Reach. Even now you may find a forum that says, sprint doesn’t belong in Halo. They need to just get out of their past and think about how maybe Halo 6 or whatever comes out next can be good. Sprint threads don’t help the franchise become a better franchise because we already know H6 will probably have the same type of gameplay as H5. Whoever is the Management of 343, they’re fcking up big time, but to say they only care about money, that’s insanely dumb. If you don’t know, almost all game developers have to work almost 70 hours a week sometimes. So when someone says that they care about money, are they that stupid to work 30 more hours without pay, to get money or do they want to make a good game? Sure maybe the way they envisioned Halo may not be the best direction or even proper direction, but us as fans probably hurt them, Brian Reed sure he sucks at writing, he may suck at writing that doesn’t mean he’s a bad guy that wants to ruin Halo, he may just suck. He literally closed down most of his social media due to how the fans reacted to his bad story telling. It makes a point, but that is morally wrong do to do something like that. Like when I heard about that I was just shocked to see how mean and toxic the community was, that isn’t the way to do something. Imagine you’re 343, they’re making a good game but they’re having trouble trying to cater to the old fans, how are they supposed to do that with Their games gameplay? How do you think Halo should’ve changed? This is just my opinion I could be wrong, but a game can’t stay the same for 17 years. By the way people look at Halo 5 and reach and 4 they say it’s not Halo(Talking about gameplay wise). So I’m just trying to say I get it, the older Halos are great they’re probably better than the modern Halo, but a large portion of the community also say they want traditional Halo and don’t think about some of the other things.
But you knew that already, right?
Anyway…I think after Halo 4 we said we don’t want power rangers in multiplayer and yet in Halo 5 we still got them. The funny thing is, if I’m correct 343 said there won’t be colored undersuit in Halo 5…they lied. Oor maybe not entirely? Because the only person who got black undersuit is Sarah Palmer. For example Chief should look like this.
For some reason only Palmer has it.
Or it is possible they forget these from the beta 1pic, 2pic…so where were the black undersuits went? To the trashcan?
The Spartans would look more better, cooler and don’t say that I wrong.
Then the armors…lot of them are so ugly that bring shame on Halo. I don’t know what the multiplayer team doing but there’s a problem with them. I’m ok with Blue Team and Osiris armors but WHAT.THE.-Yoink-.ARE.THESE?
ranger, that ugly something, mako, megatron and unicorn in one And these are just some examples.
Thirdly, I would mention the skins. I admit some of them look good but I still found them childish and unnecessary, but if 343 decided to make them, then DON’T even think about making pizza, fries etc. skins.
As you said changes not bad and of course we need some but ONLY if those changes won’t bring shame on Halo, won’t make Spartans some stupid looking power rangers.
Ya, and OP - with no offense - could you use paragraphs? If you use mobile, then ignore it.
Edit: Here’s another thing. After what happened to Cortana in Halo 4, we argued about whether she should return or not. Many of us said she should not, however 343 brought back her, in a way we probably not expected. She became evil. Let’s just say ok, afterall Bungie also had a similar idea in Halo Combat Evolved. At least, please 343…don’t try to convince us that Cortana is not evil. Since when is a good thing when you try to force your -Yoink- to people with every way you can? Even with brute force/
violently. In this case the Propeths, Gravemind nor the Didact were evil bacause…well…they just did what they thought is right. -Yoink- logic.
So, yeah we try to tell what is wrong, what should they do to makes things right…
Maybe it’s time for everyone to move to Call of Duty, and preorder Infinite Warfare.
> 2533274882271122;1:
> Change isnt bad guys
um what? sorry man, you cant start your stance with a “given” that “change isnt bad.”
If i cut your leg off, you can still get around yeah? If i take out one of your eyes, you can still see? can you not adapt? won’t life still continue? How would it be going through life with 2 fingers? Cant you adapt?
As you can see, change CAN be bad. you cant start with the completely incorrect assumption that change, by definition, is good. LOTS of crap is bad. While 343 fixed lots of the crap, there are STILL bad things. you being “okay” with bad things, doesnt make them good. It doesnt make Halo a good game. Just because it says “Halo” doesnt mean its good. If you cant look at every single aspect of Halo, and break it down to a pro/con list, and acknowledge bad things, then your voice is COMPLETELY irrelevent. That’s called being a fanboy. You are not helping the situation, and you honeslty just shouldnt talk.
Yes i agree
> 2533274978333910;12:
> Maybe it’s time for everyone to move to Call of Duty, and preorder Infinite Warfare.
I’m betting 90 percent of the people buying it are only doing so for the modern warfare remaster,and this is a halo forum idk why ur trying to tell people to move on to a worse fps franchise
Living without a leg? That isn’t change that is loss. Change is maybe like changing your type of style of clothing to something else. A Fanboy? Did I ever say 343 is the best, they made a really good game? No! No pros and Cons list? Check out my thread in “How to Make Halo 6 Great” there I put the cons of Halo 5 and then also put the positives of it so they can put those in the next game. That list made me want to make this, right now there is that stupid thread that says, removing sprint in halo will make Halo Halo again. That thread helps no one! It’s pretty obvious that there are still people that just want it to be classic Halo, but 343 have made different changes some good most bad. But sprint? It’s been in the past 3 Halos, it’s definitely going to be in Halo 6 and instead of coming up with multiple threads on how to improve sprint and the Spartan abilities, they just make a thread that wants sprint out!
> 2533274799185319;13:
> > 2533274882271122;1:
> > Change isnt bad guys
>
>
> um what? sorry man, you cant start your stance with a “given” that “change isnt bad.”
>
> If i cut your leg off, you can still get around yeah? If i take out one of your eyes, you can still see? can you not adapt? won’t life still continue? How would it be going through life with 2 fingers? Cant you adapt?
>
> As you can see, change CAN be bad. you cant start with the completely incorrect assumption that change, by definition, is good. LOTS of crap is bad. While 343 fixed lots of the crap, there are STILL bad things. you being “okay” with bad things, doesnt make them good. It doesnt make Halo a good game. Just because it says “Halo” doesnt mean its good. If you cant look at every single aspect of Halo, and break it down to a pro/con list, and acknowledge bad things, then your voice is COMPLETELY irrelevent. That’s called being a fanboy. You are not helping the situation, and you honeslty just shouldnt talk.
Forgot to quote you, look at the response above.
It’s only dies when the community or you wants it too. If you don’t want it to than stop saying and stop thinking it, everyone needs to remember that.
> 2533274960911470;18:
> It’s only dies when the community or you wants it too. If you don’t want it to than stop saying and stop thinking it, everyone needs to remember that.
Well, the MCC is kinda unplayable due to population, and well sadly, I just don’t think it will return, ever, at least not in another major Halo Title.
> 2533274882271122;19:
> > 2533274960911470;18:
> > It’s only dies when the community or you wants it too. If you don’t want it to than stop saying and stop thinking it, everyone needs to remember that.
>
>
> Well, the MCC is kinda unplayable due to population, and well sadly, I just don’t think it will return, ever, at least not in another major Halo Title.
But that’s the MCC. The MCC isn’t the real classic halo and never will be. Especially halo 3, halo 3 just feels wrong when you play it on MCC. That’s why I still play the 360 version.
Classic halo may be dead, but it’s nothing one giant super charged pair of defibrillators can’t fix.