Any one else find it ironic how alot of people will bash on alot of players for wanting Infinite to PLAY like H3 because it was so good by telling them to go back to it if it was so good yet you see those same people commenting “i want to make my spartan look like how i had it in Reach”
1 Like
Your question is very confusing to me lol
5 Likes
You lost me
20 characters
1 Like
There’s a large difference between “This game doesn’t feel like classic Halo, I wish it played more like X” to, “I wish I didn’t have to spend $$ on microtransactions to get armor sets for a core that I also had to spend money on.”
Some people straight up want sprint, clamber, and even equipment removed, this is a far taller order than asking for the Security shoulder pieces to be in the BP instead of having to make 2-X separate purchases just to get gear from previous games.
(this wouldn’t be too big an issue, but with the prices, and how many things are bundled, or sets just not in the BP e.g. Hazop, it might cost some players a LOT of money for antiquated and/or nostalgic armor.)
It’s almost as if being relegated to an almost 15 year old game to enjoy traditional halo feels like a total slap in the face. 
I see more people wanting it to play like Halo 5 lol
I’m sure there are a few out there, but most people I see comparing it to Halo 3 are doing so fondly rather than in a hostile manner.
In all honesty, Halo Infinite should be Halo Infinite. Not Halo 3 2…
That’s why the MCC was created. If you want Halo 3, you can play Halo 3.
As for wanting my Spartan look like my Spartan from Reach. I honestly want to do that for the Reach Spartan Core set. But I’m in no rush to make it, more so since I’m still missing a few pieces.
I’m also slowly crafting a decent Mark VII Spartan to play as well, and I hope some pieces from Halo 3 even come as well.
Cosmetics honestly isn’t an issue regardless. Gameplay on the other hand is a thing. Halo 3 was good yeah, but Halo Infinite is fun too for many.