> basic assumption
Wanted to stop reading here ut forced myself not to. Here lies the most glaring problem with your post…
> - The most advanced race of their time
> - The only widespread race of their time
> - They were ancient humans
> - They were the first and only to face the Flood, and no one else had ever done so
- This has not changed. The Precursors were driven back millions of years before, the San’Shyuum were mostly exterminated by the Halo’s firing at Janjur Qom, and Ancient Humanity was devolved 10,000 years before the Halos were activated.
2)See above.
-
Nope, this idea was abandoned in Halo 3 with the release of The Cradle of Life and Halo 3’s Terminals.
-
Never any evidence to suggest that, we only had the point of view of the Didact and Librarian in the final years of the Forerunner-Flood war when we know that Forerunner history spans at least 3 million years.
> Instead, it turns out that several other races were space-faring along with them, and were also comparable in technology. One of these races was humanity itself, which lays to rest the pretty cool concept that Forerunners were ancient humans. The stupidest part, however, is that humanity and another familiar race, the San-Shyuum, faced the Flood and BEAT IT.
They didn’t beat it, the Flood retreated because Ancient Humanity had passed the ‘test’ for the Mantle.
Again, the idea that Forerunners became humans was both abandoned and made no sense by the time Halo: The Cradle of Life and Halo 3’s terminals came about which cover the fact that the Librarian was on Earth being observed by Tier 7 humans. She called them special and hinted that they were the key to something to do with the Precursors.
> Although the stupidest part is that the Forerunners and Humanity had a war between each other afterward, and the Forerunners won and destroyed everything. Leaving the question: why have humanity in there at all?
Er… what? That’s like saying “oh well the Covenant were defeated in Halo 3 so what was the point in having them in the games at all?”…
> It’s absolutely pointless and counteracts a the big plot twist in Halo 3, where 343 Guilty Spark explicitly calls Master Chief a Forerunner. Why have Bungie build up all this evidence and then retcon it?
Bungie retconned the idea long before 343i came along (for the umpteenth time - Cradle of Life and H3 Terminals). ‘Forerunner’ is a title, not the actual race name. The Forerunners saw themselves as just another stage in the Living Time of the universe, when they passed the Mantle down to humanity we effectively became the new ‘Forerunners’ - thus “you are Forerunner”.
> The line of logic is that humanity can beat the Flood, the Forerunners can beat humanity, but they can’t beat the Flood? What kind of logic is that? Also, the Forerunners can beat the Precursors, an actually kind of cool idea as well, the Precursors of whom also are more advanced than the Forerunners and perhaps developed or captured the Flood.
Once again, Ancient Humanity did not beat the Flood. Also, your point makes even less sense when one considers that modern humanity defeats the Flood AND A GRAVEMIND when they’re effectively 2 Tiers below Ancient Humanity and the Forerunners.
> But the Forerunners couldn’t beat the Flood.
Because the Flood turned their own technology against them, ravaged their worlds and were completely relentless in their assault. Once again - ANCIENT HUMANITY DID NOT BEAT THE FLOOD, THEY SIMPLY RETREATED WHEN HUMANITY HAD FULFILLED THE TEST FOR THE MANTLE. The Flood were bent on complete annihilation with the Forerunners because they had failed the test.
> When I first started playing Halo, I kept asking myself why the Forerunners lost to the Flood when they had all this advanced technology to fight it: Sentinels, Enforcers, and the like. But then again, you see them in battle against the Flood throughout the series, and they aren’t too efficient. So whatever, they lost.
Irrelevant and contradictory point is irrelevant and contradictory…
> Then Halo 4 comes around with the Prometheans.
>
> At first I though they were totally separate from the Forerunners, but then I realized that in the last Terminal of Halo: CEA, 343 Guilty Spark mentions Didact and the Prometheans, Didact of whom has been confirmed in Halo 4.
>
> So they not only had the Sentinels and the Enforcers, but a whole other department of artificial soldiers even more lethal? AND THEY STILL LOST AGAINST THE FLOOD?
See point above the above…
> It just blows my mind as to why 343 had to retcon the Forerunner=Human deal at all. It worked well and made sense. This whole new situation makes no sense and is really unnecessary.
HOW can Forerunners=humans make sense when the Librarian is on Earth with the trillions of other Forerunners fighting the Flood at the same time as humanity being on Earth in a Tier 7 state. How can that make ANY sense? Greg bear has made this make sense by actually having a story behind Ancient Humanity and how they came to be what they are.
> While I always had and do still have faith in 343, I find how they handled the Forerunners to be really, really dumb. The fact that they seem to be centering this next trilogy around them is a bit unsettling coupled with this. I just hope that the games are handled with more care than the books and such.
Nothing about what they have done with the Forerunners is illogical or non-sensical in any way. You’ve clearly just not been paying any attention to the development of the universe in Halo 3 through the Terminals.