if someone calls you dumb for bashing halo 4 about not having visible ranks, just go look at there service record, they don’t care because over half go negative and lose a large percentage of their games? oh they are just casual gamers you say? THEN WHY THE **** WOULD A PERSON THAT ACTUALLY CARES ABOUT THAT STUFF WANT TO BE PAIRED UP WITH THAT PERSON THAT DOESNT… okay im tired now. no more.
Lol, we still have 1-50. Just not the way previous Halo’s had it.
Bingo.
I’ve said it many times, the ONLY PEOPLE WHO DON’T WANT RANKS ARE THE ONES WHO SUCK AT THE GAME. Period.
I like the part where you gave no evidence on why visible ranks are good.
> if someone calls you dumb for bashing halo 4 about not having visible ranks, just go look at there service record, they don’t care because over half go negative and lose a large percentage of their games? oh they are just casual gamers you say? THEN WHY THE **** WOULD A PERSON THAT ACTUALLY CARES ABOUT THAT STUFF WANT TO BE PAIRED UP WITH THAT PERSON THAT DOESNT… okay im tired now. no more.
Stat flaming, against the rules, lock inbound.
> > if someone calls you dumb for bashing halo 4 about not having visible ranks, just go look at there service record, they don’t care because over half go negative and lose a large percentage of their games? oh they are just casual gamers you say? THEN WHY THE **** WOULD A PERSON THAT ACTUALLY CARES ABOUT THAT STUFF WANT TO BE PAIRED UP WITH THAT PERSON THAT DOESNT… okay im tired now. no more.
>
> Stat flaming, against the rules, lock inbound.
In before lock.
Also OP, I’m not negative, I’m positive and I don’t care about ranks, way to be stereotypical there.
> > if someone calls you dumb for bashing halo 4 about not having visible ranks, just go look at there service record, they don’t care because over half go negative and lose a large percentage of their games? oh they are just casual gamers you say? THEN WHY THE **** WOULD A PERSON THAT ACTUALLY CARES ABOUT THAT STUFF WANT TO BE PAIRED UP WITH THAT PERSON THAT DOESNT… okay im tired now. no more.
>
> Stat flaming, against the rules, lock inbound.
haha
> if someone calls you dumb for bashing halo 4 about not having visible ranks, just go look at there service record, they don’t care because over half go negative and lose a large percentage of their games? oh they are just casual gamers you say? THEN WHY THE **** WOULD A PERSON THAT ACTUALLY CARES ABOUT THAT STUFF WANT TO BE PAIRED UP WITH THAT PERSON THAT DOESNT… okay im tired now. <mark>no more</mark>.
I agree with the “no more” part.
> > > if someone calls you dumb for bashing halo 4 about not having visible ranks, just go look at there service record, they don’t care because over half go negative and lose a large percentage of their games? oh they are just casual gamers you say? THEN WHY THE **** WOULD A PERSON THAT ACTUALLY CARES ABOUT THAT STUFF WANT TO BE PAIRED UP WITH THAT PERSON THAT DOESNT… okay im tired now. no more.
> >
> > Stat flaming, against the rules, lock inbound.
>
> In before lock.
>
> Also OP, I’m not negative, I’m positive and I don’t care about ranks, way to be stereotypical there.
i wouldn’t be stereotypical if i didnt have a reason to be 
> Bingo.
>
> I’ve said it many times, the ONLY PEOPLE WHO DON’T WANT RANKS ARE THE ONES WHO SUCK AT THE GAME. Period.
AMEN.
> Bingo.
>
> I’ve said it many times, the ONLY PEOPLE WHO DON’T WANT RANKS ARE THE ONES WHO SUCK AT THE GAME. Period.
ummm… I dont care about ranks and im pretty good.
K/D can be deceptive, since I play quite a bit of Grifball, so just because I enjoy fun gametypes means I suck at the game?
Stat-flaming is against the rules, so following the OP’s suggestion is probably not a good idea.