The reason as to why we are complaining are as follows:
We know why you all are complaining ,but they won’t be coming so you’ll just have to deal with it.
> 2533274973957410;2:
> We know why you all are complaining ,but they won’t be coming so you’ll just have to deal with it.
As i said im happy we have a unsc air vehicle, we just don’t need another VTOL
> 2533274808132968;4:
> 1) It’s not just a reskinned phaeton, look closer.
> 2) Passengers would not work with how halo 5’s guns work currently. It would be just as easy to take down the passengers/gunners as it is for a warthog. Possibly even easier if they do a VTOL.
Falcons got decimated in btb, as i said they would really shine in customs and clan wars, their main use as transports allowed them to be used tactically
I still don’t know why people really care about having one in the first place the banshee could easily take it down.
what really needs to happen, is that people need to be less fussy about what they are getting.
> 2533274847437767;6:
> I still don’t know why people really care about having one in the first place the banshee could easily take it down.
> what really needs to happen, is that people need to be less fussy about what they are getting.
You know spire, the map in reach, that had a falcon and a banshee and you know what, the gunners wrecked the banshee, its all about coordination and common sense. Something the falcon enforces.
> 2533274969048425;3:
> > 2533274973957410;2:
> > We know why you all are complaining ,but they won’t be coming so you’ll just have to deal with it.
>
>
> As i said im happy we have a unsc air vehicle, we just don’t need another VTOL
Umm… Every single UNSC air vehicle so far has been a VTOL. The Hornet, Falcon, and now the Wasp. Plus, what does it being a VTOL have to do with it carrying passengers or not?
VTOL = Vertical Take Off and Landing, it’s the way that the vehicle flies. If you’re saying that we don’t need another single-crew attack air vehicle, then I agree. While I do like the Wasp, it would be nice to have another team-oriented vehicle like the Falcon, or at least something like the Hornet that can carry passengers.
Still, I’m stoked to try out the Wasp and am happy that we’re getting it!
> 2533274808386392;8:
> > 2533274969048425;3:
> > > 2533274973957410;2:
> > > We know why you all are complaining ,but they won’t be coming so you’ll just have to deal with it.
> >
> >
> > As i said im happy we have a unsc air vehicle, we just don’t need another VTOL
>
>
> Umm… Every single UNSC air vehicle so far has been a VTOL. The Hornet, Falcon, and now the Wasp. Plus, what does it being a VTOL have to do with it carrying passengers or not?
>
> VTOL = Vertical Take Off and Landing, it’s the way that the vehicle flies. If you’re saying that we don’t need another single-crew attack air vehicle, then I agree. While I do like the Wasp, it would be nice to have another team-oriented vehicle like the Falcon, or at least something like the Hornet that can carry passengers.
>
> Still, I’m stoked to try out the Wasp and am happy that we’re getting it!
Don’t forget about the sparrowhawk and vulture. and the brand new nightingale… or would it be old since it was from the spirit of fire? hmm…
You know, the nightingale would be kinda nice, smoke grenades and passenger support a nice fast speed and slim design. . . why aren’t more people supporting this!?
Agreed. What we need is essentially a flying warthog, not another solo attack vehicle.
> 2533274868938324;11:
> Agreed. What we need is essentially a flying warthog, not another solo attack vehicle.
what we need is a fresh new thread not one dug out 3 weeks ago. How you bring these up i have no idea