I personally suggest that FFA have a different way of ranking up considering there really is NO teamwork.
It is a Lonewolf state the entire time you play.
I believe only 1st and 2nd should rank up, because the other day I ranked up in last place.
Maybe the ranking structure has been copy and pasted from Team Slayer to FFA.
If you ranked up when you weren’t in first, then it can’t be a copy and paste from Team Slayer.
Yeh if you’re in last and level up then it’s not working quite right, although if you still managed to kill onyx players a reasonable amount and it puts you down to silver the you’ll destroy them. So what really needs to change is the spread on ranks it puts you against
> 2535410172709117;1:
> I personally suggest that FFA have a different way of ranking up considering there really is NO teamwork.
> It is a Lonewolf state the entire time you play.
> I believe only 1st and 2nd should rank up, because the other day I ranked up in last place.
> Maybe the ranking structure has been copy and pasted from Team Slayer to FFA.
How in the world could you possibly think that FFA ranking is copied from Team Slayer? If that were the case, only first place would ever rank up. FFA is all about individual performance and the ranks of other players in the game. Team playlists are all about winning and losing.
I still don’t understand it though. It rewards you for doing absolutely garbage sometime.
Yoinking brownie points I tell you. I think 1st and 2nd should only rank up.
If they really had to I’d accept 1-3rd getting ranked up.
But why should everyone rank up, including myself at the bottom of the list, for brownie point type reward?
I am aware that this may not happen every time, but it happens quite often.
When I said Team Slayer was copy and pasted the part that I mean was “copy and pasted” is no matter how good or bad you seem to do
you still rank up regardless of how well you have done. Like when you’re on the winning team, in Team Slayer, but have been carried you still rank up.
The game should only allow the skilled players to actually rank up - not the petty carry me the whole game people.
The Pro’s have seem to slightly bypass this by only organizing Elite teams, which are teams consisting of greater value players.
In the Arena, not including FFA, this is impossible to do, unless you have a team of players equal to your skill,
because the ranking structure doesn’t always categorize everyone correctly.
Even though this game has nothing to do with politics it seems to have a very big comparison.
Where we have to allow much more Socialism, to our Ranks, in order to gain more players.
This game may have a ranking structure, but is one of the more poor ranking structures. It’s too mixed with socialists and competitive players.
How and where they have went wrong is not separating the Social players from the Competitive players correctly in the Arena.
Wait you ranked up when you were in last place? Wow thats pretty weird.
This happens to me all the time! I totally agree. This ranking structure is yoinked bro!
Worst one we’ve ever had. I sadly, and wish I didn’t, like Halo 4’s ranking structure better.
Halo 5 lacks putting the skilled players with the skilled players, and putting lower ranked players with the lower ranked players.
I thought it was called climb the ranking structure - not everyone just randomly climb the ladder, because it really has no purpose.
In fact put the ladder on the ground and walk on it lol.
We need H2 or H3 ranking and matchmaking back… and no way was H4 ranking better. H5 ranking maybe strange at times but it’s still better and H4.
Well, if u think about it, its fine. If OP got last and hypothetically got 20 kills, (let’s just say it was a REALLY close game), he should rank up. If OP got last with like 5 kills, he would easily rank down. Who agrees?
> 2535462360297076;9:
> Well, if u think about it, its fine. If OP got last and hypothetically got 20 kills, (let’s just say it was a REALLY close game), he should rank up. If OP got last with like 5 kills, he would easily rank down. Who agrees?
Sorry to say, but I don’t agree at all. A loss is a loss, and a win or partial win is a win.
I think its fine the way it is.
you rank up based on who you do well against. Its why you get CSR for coming in last place sometimes.
> 2533274880738935;10:
> > 2535462360297076;9:
> > Well, if u think about it, its fine. If OP got last and hypothetically got 20 kills, (let’s just say it was a REALLY close game), he should rank up. If OP got last with like 5 kills, he would easily rank down. Who agrees?
>
>
> Sorry to say, but I don’t agree at all. A loss is a loss, and a win or partial win is a win.
Ffa should be skill based as it is. Win/lose system is bad. I feel that even the team based games should be individual based.
If you play with the same team then you should have a team rank as well.
This would play well with spartan companies.
What I’m saying, is if you go stag into games then you get separate rank. If you go in as a fireteam, you get a team rank.
I’ve digressed. Ffa ranking is just fine.
bloo plague
> 2535410172709117;1:
> I personally suggest that FFA have a different way of ranking up considering there really is NO teamwork.
> It is a Lonewolf state the entire time you play.
> I believe only 1st and 2nd should rank up, because the other day I ranked up in last place.
> Maybe the ranking structure has been copy and pasted from Team Slayer to FFA.
I have made it to Champ 96 in FFA so far.
Here’s how it works - when your rank is lower Onyx or less you can move even in 5th or 6th place if you play higher ranked players and don’t get destroyed.
When you get to high Onyx like say around 2100, you have to come in 1st, 2nd or 3rd or you go down. When I place 3rd I don’t go down or up once in the 2100’s Onyx range.
So it may seem easy at first but try to get a Champ rank and you’ll see that it changes as you go further.
Good Luck Guys! C HUNTER 0NE
And the rankings are good to me except I think more individual performance rewards on team games would be better. It sucks to play with randoms and go 20 and 5 but lose and go down. And I know the weaker players will disagree and say “well get a team then” but I don’t always want tone or have players online to run with. The way it is now, I can have Champ 96 in FFA and diamond in 4 man because I play with randoms. It totally misrepresents a players skill levels. I agree with blood plague that there should be a rank for team and personal performances and both should be visible between games.
C HUNTER 0NE
> 2535458926080221;14:
> > 2535410172709117;1:
> > I personally suggest that FFA have a different way of ranking up considering there really is NO teamwork.
> > It is a Lonewolf state the entire time you play.
> > I believe only 1st and 2nd should rank up, because the other day I ranked up in last place.
> > Maybe the ranking structure has been copy and pasted from Team Slayer to FFA.
>
> I have made it to Champ 96 in FFA so far.
>
> Here’s how it works - when your rank is lower Onyx or less you can move even in 5th or 6th place if you play higher ranked players and don’t get destroyed.
>
> When you get to high Onyx like say around 2100, you have to come in 1st, 2nd or 3rd or you go down. When I place 3rd I don’t go down or up once in the 2100’s Onyx range.
>
> So it may seem easy at first but try to get a Champ rank and you’ll see that it changes as you go further.
> Good Luck Guys! C HUNTER 0NE
Please don’t revive old threads.