I keep seeing posts in regards to the ranking system in Halo 5, some like the system while others prefer the original 1-50 rank. Personally I like the 1-50 rank more because it makes me feel like I am actually going through ranks to achieve where I know I am best it. I enjoy having the emblem smack me in the face whenever I achieve it after a match, it just makes me feel good seeing it. I was a 39 in Halo 3 and I guess that would be considered good but this tier system I think is a bad implement towards a proper working system. Others can argue otherwise and honestly I don’t have the knowledge to back up which would be better for the series.
Maybe a smart person can help me out on this and compare which would be better for the series and why?
Just have everyone start at Bronze. Now the really good people wouldnt like htis because they skip all the low tiers in placement matches, but everyone isn’t MLG. And there is a high chance poeple get ranked out of place becaus eof the placement matches
> 2533274829723893;2:
> This system could work just like the 1-50 system.
>
> Just have everyone start at Bronze. Now the really good people wouldnt like htis because they skip all the low tiers in placement matches, but everyone isn’t MLG. And there is a high chance poeple get ranked out of place becaus eof the placement matches
I agree, it could work just like the 1-50 because even if everyone starts low they could work their ways up to their ranks.
> 2533274829723893;2:
> This system could work just like the 1-50 system.
>
> Just have everyone start at Bronze. Now the really good people wouldnt like htis because they skip all the low tiers in placement matches, but everyone isn’t MLG. And there is a high chance poeple get ranked out of place becaus eof the placement matches
I like the 1-50 but then what would our level Rank be represented as because I know you can’t have 1-152 for time attritubed then 1-50 for Skill
> 2690096563135647;4:
> > 2533274829723893;2:
> > This system could work just like the 1-50 system.
> >
> > Just have everyone start at Bronze. Now the really good people wouldnt like htis because they skip all the low tiers in placement matches, but everyone isn’t MLG. And there is a high chance poeple get ranked out of place becaus eof the placement matches
>
>
> I like the 1-50 but then what would our level Rank be represented as because I know you can’t have 1-152 for time attritubed then 1-50 for Skill
> 2533274832183516;5:
> > 2690096563135647;4:
> > > 2533274829723893;2:
> > > This system could work just like the 1-50 system.
> > >
> > > Just have everyone start at Bronze. Now the really good people wouldnt like htis because they skip all the low tiers in placement matches, but everyone isn’t MLG. And there is a high chance poeple get ranked out of place becaus eof the placement matches
> >
> >
> > I like the 1-50 but then what would our level Rank be represented as because I know you can’t have 1-152 for time attritubed then 1-50 for Skill
>
>
> You would have the progression system from Reach.
Progeression for ranking is the dumbest system I ever seen. I much prefer the skill rank system, even with its flaws.
Like stated above, the Bronze- Champion could act as a 1-50 skill based ranking system. I miss my 50s so much. I don’t mind the Bronze-Champion ranks though, they just need some adjusting, proper adjusting.
> 2533274903975459;8:
> Like stated above, the Bronze- Champion could act as a 1-50 skill based ranking system. I miss my 50s so much. I don’t mind the Bronze-Champion ranks though, they just need some adjusting, proper adjusting.
I only made it to a 45. but that was the account I had over 2,000 games on. I bet if I made a new one I could of made it to 50.
> 2533274829723893;9:
> > 2533274903975459;8:
> > Like stated above, the Bronze- Champion could act as a 1-50 skill based ranking system. I miss my 50s so much. I don’t mind the Bronze-Champion ranks though, they just need some adjusting, proper adjusting.
>
>
> I only made it to a 45. but that was the account I had over 2,000 games on. I bet if I made a new one I could of made it to 50.
>
> Aweee the good ol days
One 4 star general (banned now), and two 2 star general accounts. Also, several 50s spread across a few accounts as well as me and my friends boosting service from back in the day haha yes, the good ol’ days (:
the problem with a 1-50 is that it guves players the impression that ranks are something to be achieved (like in an rpg) rather than a tool for matching.
what should happen is a 1-99 percentile rank where everyone starts at the norm of 50. then players spread out across the spectrum per the normal curve distribution.
ranked playlists would implement tighter matching protocols, and have seasons where players could dedicate them selves to earning a badge or rank not unlike other sporting events.
unranked playlists would have much looser protocols but still attempt to match based on the skill percentile.