Are they really trying to pass this off as CQB?
DYNAST Is ugly in comparison.
EditI did a little Photoshop.
If one of the variants look like this.<<<<
I would be ok with it.
…
“Give me back my face!” -rorschach
Are they really trying to pass this off as CQB?
DYNAST Is ugly in comparison.
EditI did a little Photoshop.
If one of the variants look like this.<<<<
I would be ok with it.
…
“Give me back my face!” -rorschach
Definately got decimator aplha’d. =)
It doesn’t look that bad.
Paint it the right way?..we’re it so easy!
It looks fine, you people on here will find anything to nitpick about.
I looked at it and noticed how it looked a lot like CQB. Then I read the description and thought that it was pretty cool how lore wise, it was built around CQC and CQB armors.
> 2533274974597111;3:
> It looks fine, you people on here will find anything to nitpick about.
I’m glad they tried<
Ill wear it, I’m just hoping it has the right markings.
Cqb has been my favorite for 10 years.
It’s like changing the face of “Jesus” to me.
> 2533274988394857;4:
> I looked at it and noticed how it looked a lot like CQB. Then I read the description and thought that it was pretty cool how lore wise, it was built around CQC and CQB armors.
The description is reassuring.
DYNAST
Armor: The DYNAST is a “brawler” armor variant that excels in close-range firefights through a combination of resilience and improved situational awareness.
Helmet: Having in many ways effectively replaced older CQB and CQB designs, the DYNAST helmet shell is covered by layers of compressed carbon nanotubes and hyperdiamond sheets, making it fantastically durable . . . and expensive.
> 2533274983213185;5:
> > 2533274974597111;3:
> > It looks fine, you people on here will find anything to nitpick about.
>
>
> I’m glad they tried<
>
> Ill wear it, I’m just hoping it has the right markings.
> Cqb has been my favorite for 10 years.
>
> It’s like changing the face of “Jesus” to me.
^ When you have to tell people that Jesus wasn’t white.
also I dont like the helmet it looked cqb design wise but I liked it for the black rubber looking bits on it which I thought 343 was going to make when I watched the fall of reach and they screwed up and gave everyone different helmets and sam had a classic cqb
I like it
> 2535405450804460;7:
> > 2533274983213185;5:
> > > 2533274974597111;3:
> > > It looks fine, you people on here will find anything to nitpick about.
> >
> >
> > I’m glad they tried<
> >
> > Ill wear it, I’m just hoping it has the right markings.
> > Cqb has been my favorite for 10 years.
> >
> > It’s like changing the face of “Jesus” to me.
>
>
> ^ When you have to tell people that Jesus wasn’t white.
> also I dont like the helmet it looked cqb design wise but I liked it for the black rubber looking bits on it which I thought 343 was going to make when I watched the fall of reach and they screwed up and gave everyone different helmets and sam had a classic cqb
I was hoping it was the fall of reach version or…
Or take the helmet model straight from halo 3, with texture update.
(noble armor treatment/rather than decimator)
It doesn’t look that bad, if I can get my hands on the helmet I might pair it with the mark 6 gen 1, relive halo 3
Wh-what’s wrong with Decimator? sniffle
> 2533274832368555;11:
> Wh-what’s wrong with Decimator? sniffle
Nothing man, I love Decimator TBH
> 2533274832368555;11:
> Wh-what’s wrong with Decimator? sniffle
If mark v (b) from halo reach didn’t exist?
Nothing, it looks good.
…
It’s a comparison issue for me.
Photoshoped a perfect version
to look like this.<<<<
If one of the blurred ones is like this…
I’ll never take it off.
It’s not the CQB that I know and love by any means, but it’s a nice armour. I might use the helmet once I get it.
> 2533274974597111;3:
> It looks fine, you people on here will find anything to nitpick about.
It does look fine, but it’s not our beloved CQB armour. I like it, sure, but I won’t accept it as a replacement for CQB.
I wore CBQ all the way through 3 and Reach, It was my Bae. I don’t think I’m going to take this helmet off!
> 2533274808386392;16:
> > 2533274974597111;3:
> > It looks fine, you people on here will find anything to nitpick about.
>
>
> It does look fine, but it’s not our beloved CQB armour. I like it, sure, but I won’t accept it as a replacement for CQB.
What if it was painted like this? ([Link](http://EditI did a little Photoshop. If one of the variants looks like this.<<<< I’ll never take it off.))<
^^^^^^^
Cqb and cqc were in its description.soo…
It’s the best were gonna get.
I’m glad they even made it, I feel guilty for posting about it all the time.
Knew they’d “next gen it”, rather than port or faithful recreation.
> 2533274983213185;14:
> Photoshoped a perfect version
> to look like this.<<<<
> If one of the blurred ones is like this…
> I’ll never take it off.
Dude yes