Had a player leave and the bot was basically 5 free points for the other team (0 kills, 5 deaths) in a close game. How about just not give us a bot at all so we can have a chance at winning? Bot doesn’t add any fun or improvement to the game.
Players ignore objective and jerk off in the corners.
Players feed the other team more kills.
I’ve been losing 90% of my games because MM gives me the people who do not play objective.
Bots are the best teammates that I have had these last 2 days.
3 Likes
MM doesn’t give you those non object playing players. 343 did when they incentivized challenges over winning games.
Both teams are effected by challenges.
There are challenges for winning games and specific game types to encourage people to win.
My team tends to be filled with potatoes who go for kills only.
The other team plays objective and wins.
The amount of times I brought the flag 2 feet away from the capture point just to see my team run around the flag and not score it.
The amount of times I’ve been holding the oddball and my team ran away and left me alone.
The amount of times I have been the only one to capture zones.
If people where incentive to do challenges my win/lose should be closer to 50/50 since both teams would be goofing off with challenges. Instead I’m sitting with a rad 10/90.
Thank god for bots. They are least back me up.
Yeah but if I’m in a close game of slayer, I’d rather not have a bot who goes 0/5 k/d… For objective based game modes, I suppose bots can be reasonable.