Unfortunately i bought the map pass before i realised all the issues in the game, so 343 already have my cash, but i’ll definitely not be buying anything else unless the game is fixed.
> Unfortunately i bought the map pass before i realised all the issues in the game, so 343 already have my cash, but i’ll definitely not be buying anything else unless the game is fixed.
> > Unfortunately i bought the map pass before i realised all the issues in the game, so 343 already have my cash, but i’ll definitely not be buying anything else unless the game is fixed.
>
> This ^^
Someone clear something up for me- releasing DLC (a map pack no less) not 30 days after the release of a game is bad why? Is the data already on the disk and ready to be used, and 343 is charging for an unlock key? If that’s the case, then yeah, -Yoink- move. But if it’s stuff that, say, for example, is unfinished, and 343 is charging for the “second half” to complete it, I see significantly less of a problem.
> Someone clear something up for me- releasing DLC (a map pack no less) not 30 days after the release of a game is bad why? Is the data already on the disk and ready to be used, and 343 is charging for an unlock key? If that’s the case, then yeah, -Yoink!- move. But if it’s stuff that, say, for example, is unfinished, and 343 is charging for the “second half” to complete it, I see significantly less of a problem.
>
> So what’s wrong, exactly?
I think the main problem is that people feel that resources should be focused on addressing the issues that the base game has first.
> I think the main problem is that people feel that resources should be focused on addressing the issues that the base game has first.
I felt that way with GoW3, but then I was made to realize that the DLC development teams and the patch teams are different. There’s no need for 343 to put every available man on the task of patching up the few genunine problems the game has.
So long as the DLC isn’t already on the disk, I’m ok.