Look guys after the release of Halo 5’s new update(Warzone Firefight) Halo 5 had the same players online as in Halo 3, but haters will say but halo 5 had free days in the store, after those free days halo 5 continued with the same people ompnline, maybe is not that good as halo 3 was or emblematic, or classic, but the thing i want to say, the halo 5 community is probably going to recover, and it could recover in halo 6
Thanks For Your Attention, Paulo
> 2535439699513312;1:
> Look guys after the release of Halo 5’s new update(Warzone Firefight) Halo 5 had the same players online as in Halo 3, but haters will say but halo 5 had free days in the store, after those free days halo 5 continued with the same people ompnline, maybe is not that good as halo 3 was or emblematic, or classic, but the thing i want to say, the halo 5 community is probably going to recover, and it could recover in halo 6
> Thanks For Your Attention, Paulo
No, it didn’t have the same players online as Halo 3. It had the most monthly active players since Halo 3, not the same amount and “active monthly users” is not the same as the daily population which is what typically tells you the health of a game. And yes, Halo 5 was free and it was part of a number of bundles, so many of those new active monthly users may have started up the game once that month and never touched it again, so they would still be counted. Halo 5 did get knocked up to #6 on xbox live activity around that time (previously from around #13), but now it’s down to #11. It’s doing better than it was, but there’s little to indicate that’s particularly good.
Ok first fix the grammar in the title but judging by your name it does look like English is not your first language. Second I’m not even sure if Bravs is being legit with that statement because we have to take in a lot of factors. So we need to wait until Bravo gets the all clear on revealing the numbers.
Bravo said something that deceived many on here. It seems as if he didn’t count Halo Reach when making his statement, since even Reach was more popular than Halo 5 “Evolved”
> 2533274974695300;3:
> Ok first fix the grammar in the title but judging by your name it does look like English is not your first language. Second I’m not even sure if Bravs is being legit with that statement because we have to take in a lot of factors. So we need to wait until Bravo gets the all clear on revealing the numbers.
> 2533274817976264;4:
> Bravo said something that deceived many on here. It seems as if he didn’t count Halo Reach when making his statement, since even Reach was more popular than Halo 5 “Evolved”
Peoples’ obsession with every single word that the developer makes needs to stop.
- Firstly, so what? If they told you many people play now compared to way back when ever. Should that solely dictate if you should play tomorrow?
- Secondly, I highly doubt Bravo has access to those numbers or even the data from once they were derived from. Someone else probably told him and he as one of the Community Managers decided that this information would be okay to share to the public. So even though the word came out of Bravo I do believe that he is simply the messenger that is being blamed.
- Thirdly, because nothing is worth pointing out with less than three reasons, what will be accomplished if you guys are right?
I know from historical fan history that if the fans are proven wrong then the fans will come up with more stubborn ways to try to prove that they weren’t wrong.
> 2533274909139271;5:
> > 2533274974695300;3:
> > Ok first fix the grammar in the title but judging by your name it does look like English is not your first language. Second I’m not even sure if Bravs is being legit with that statement because we have to take in a lot of factors. So we need to wait until Bravo gets the all clear on revealing the numbers.
>
>
>
>
> > 2533274817976264;4:
> > Bravo said something that deceived many on here. It seems as if he didn’t count Halo Reach when making his statement, since even Reach was more popular than Halo 5 “Evolved”
>
>
> Peoples’ obsession with every single word that the developer makes needs to stop.
> 1. Firstly, so what? If they told you many people play now compared to way back when ever. Should that solely dictate if you should play tomorrow?
> 2. Secondly, I highly doubt Bravo has access to those numbers or even the data from once they were derived from. Someone else probably told him and he as one of the Community Managers decided that this information would be okay to share to the public. So even though the word came out of Bravo I do believe that he is simply the messenger that is being blamed.
> 3. Thirdly, because nothing is worth pointing out with less than three reasons, what will be accomplished if you guys are right?
> I know from historical fan history that if the fans are proven wrong then the fans will come up with more stubborn ways to try to prove that they weren’t wrong.
I’m just unsure until I see actul numbers. Bravs might be right but as Zr0 said, monthly active users is not an exact measurement of population. I don’t care if I’m right or wrong but you are right, the halo community sometimes doesn’t want to be wrong.