The thing that does concern me is the level of players that are testing Halo 4. Are any of them actually good? If your ‘average’ Halo player tested Reach, they’d probably come to the conclusion that Asylum is the worst map, the DMR is awful and we should have AR’s all the time, and sprint is a great addition which speeds the game up.
Just a thought. People who can actually play Halo tend to have a slightly better idea of what’s balanced and good than your average person who hops into team slayer, votes for AR starts and goes -7.
Perhaps harsh, but true.
Nope, because every time someone suggests an MLG team goes to test it out, they get trolled and flamed.
“Good players are a minority”
derp
> Nope, because every time someone suggests an MLG team goes to test it out, they get trolled and flamed.
Doesn’t surprise me. Wouldn’t want guys who know the game inside out to help us with gameplay balance now, would we?
> “Good players are a minority”
>
> derp
Obviously not. Bungie sucked at their own game and you can bet that everyone at 343 does too. They need people that actually know how to play giving them ideas.
> “Good players are a minority”
>
> derp
I’m not even that good and most of the players on Reach’s more social playlists make me look like the almighty video game god.
Didn’t you know? Everyone on the forums has already played Halo 4. That’s why they’re all complaining because they all know exaclty how it plays.
> Didn’t you know? Everyone on the forums has already played Halo 4. That’s why they’re all complaining because they all know exaclty how it plays.
Sorry we insulted your cult.
> > “Good players are a minority”
> >
> > derp
>
> I’m not even that good and most of the players on Reach’s more social playlists make me look like the almighty video game god.
Seriously, its easier to get a rampage in BTB than a killing spree in MLG.
> Didn’t you know? Everyone on the forums has already played Halo 4. That’s why they’re all complaining because they all know exaclty how it plays.
It doesnt take a -Yoinking!- rocket scientist to know what changes are bad. Thats a stupid argument, and often the only argument kids think of.
Thats like saying i need to try -Yoink- with roadkill before i knock on it.
> Didn’t you know? Everyone on the forums has already played Halo 4. That’s why they’re all complaining because they all know exaclty how it plays.
Oh look it’s the person that says we can’t judge Halo to be bad, yet you can judge it to be good. Quit your 343 brown nosing, you aren’t going to get anything for it.
Doubtful.
If they don’t they’ll just think “OH THIS IS GREAT” and then end up with actual good players exploiting and abusing everything on day 1.
If they just got some feedback from a few pros the game would be so much better than without. I dont wanna be running around with an AR using xray vision with last stand to get some Spartan (COD) Points to unlock Jetpack.
I wanna play Ranked from H2/H3 - the best years in Halo.
> Obviously not. Bungie sucked at their own game and you can bet that everyone at 343 does too. They need people that actually know how to play giving them ideas.
I know, Bungie were awful at their own game. But they tested Halo 1,2 and 3 and they were good. The thing is, balanced competitive Halo can be enjoyed by everyone, but unbalanced ‘Reach’ style Halo will only appeal to certain players. I still play Reach, and I do enjoy it, but the flaws on it are terrible. Halo 4 is sounding just like that.
> > Didn’t you know? Everyone on the forums has already played Halo 4. That’s why they’re all complaining because they all know exaclty how it plays.
>
> It doesnt take a -Yoinking!- rocket scientist to know what changes are bad. Thats a stupid argument, and often the only argument kids think of.
>
> Thats like saying i need to try Yoink! with roadkill before i knock on it.
At least you can see what roadkill looks like. We’ve seen about 20 seconds of in-game footage and peoplea are acting like they’ve played the game.
If you want to -Yoink- roadkill then that’s fine by me.
> > Didn’t you know? Everyone on the forums has already played Halo 4. That’s why they’re all complaining because they all know exaclty how it plays.
>
> Oh look it’s the person that says we can’t judge Halo to be bad, yet you can judge it to be good. Quit your 343 brown nosing, you aren’t going to get anything for it.
Please, point out where I said the game is good. Oh wait, I didn’t. I never have. I’m going to wait until we see some good gameplay until I make my decision. Even if the multiplayer sucks, I’m still going to buy the game for the Campaign which is going to be great.
I was convinced that MLG was working with 343i on Halo 4 multiplayer. Is this just my imagination?
> Didn’t you know? Everyone on the forums has already played Halo 4. That’s why they’re all complaining because they all know exaclty how it plays.
You’re right, those same people were wrong about bloom and AA’s in Reach, which is why Reach ended up more pop…oh wait.
> I was convinced that MLG was working with 343i on Halo 4 multiplayer. Is this just my imagination?
By the sounds of this, clearly.
> > > Didn’t you know? Everyone on the forums has already played Halo 4. That’s why they’re all complaining because they all know exaclty how it plays.
> >
> > It doesnt take a -Yoinking!- rocket scientist to know what changes are bad. Thats a stupid argument, and often the only argument kids think of.
> >
> > Thats like saying i need to try Yoink! with roadkill before i knock on it.
>
> At least you can see what roadkill looks like. We’ve seen about 20 seconds of in-game footage and peoplea are acting like they’ve played the game.
>
> If you want to -Yoink!- roadkill then that’s fine by me.
It doesnt take a damn rocket scientist to know a jetpack functions like a jetpack, invis functions like invis, and that random weapon spawns are terrible too. I dont need to play the game or see any footage to know this stuff is -Yoink-. I learned what stuff is bad by playing reach.