Do you like Halo 4

I don’t believe anyone here doesn’t enjoy Halo 4. What they don’t enjoy is various aspects of the game that they believe ruins their personal experience with the game, which bars them from enjoying it.

Love it.

Yep, I like H4. There are few problems with it, but who cares?

> Yep, I like H4. There are few problems with it, but who cares?

I cares. This game was the first Halo game that was a true disappointment to me.

Like I’ve been saying, Halo 4 lacks more features from previous games than it’s gained. That is a huge problem for a sequel, and one of the main reasons why it isn’t being successful.

> > Yep, I like H4. There are few problems with it, but who cares?
>
> I cares. This game was the first Halo game that was a true disappointment to me.
>
> Like I’ve been saying, Halo 4 lacks more features from previous games than it’s gained. That is a huge problem for a sequel, and one of the main reasons why it isn’t being successful.

Maybe I’m enjoying Halo 4 just because I only played Halo 3, ODST and Reach… I don’t mind features H4 is lacking. If I want to play Firefight, I go to ODST or Reach. If I want to play competitive MP, I choose H3. If I want to play some crazy custom games with my friends or quests, I choose between all Halo games I have (excluding ODST, of course). In other words, I play what I want to play.

Or maybe there’s something wrong about me…

No. How could anyone is their right mind say yes?

> No. How could anyone is their right mind say yes?

Looking at poll Hmmm…

> No. How could anyone is their right mind say yes?

Come on now, because you dislike it does not warrant attacks on others.

Seems like an odd question if you don’t like Halo 4, why play it? Granted that isn’t the question of the poll but it always baffles me why people play a game and state that they don’t like the game in general. Remember you can like parts of a game.

> > > Yep, I like H4. There are few problems with it, but who cares?
> >
> > I cares. This game was the first Halo game that was a true disappointment to me.
> >
> > Like I’ve been saying, Halo 4 lacks more features from previous games than it’s gained. That is a huge problem for a sequel, and one of the main reasons why it isn’t being successful.
>
> Maybe I’m enjoying Halo 4 just because I only played Halo 3, ODST and Reach… I don’t mind features H4 is lacking. If I want to play Firefight, I go to ODST or Reach. If I want to play competitive MP, I choose H3. If I want to play some crazy custom games with my friends or quests, I choose between all Halo games I have (excluding ODST, of course). In other words, I play what I want to play.
>
> Or maybe there’s something wrong about me…

Nothing is wrong with liking what you like. Don’t let anyone else tell you that.

> > > > Yep, I like H4. There are few problems with it, but who cares?
> > >
> > > I cares. This game was the first Halo game that was a true disappointment to me.
> > >
> > > Like I’ve been saying, Halo 4 lacks more features from previous games than it’s gained. That is a huge problem for a sequel, and one of the main reasons why it isn’t being successful.
> >
> > Maybe I’m enjoying Halo 4 just because I only played Halo 3, ODST and Reach… I don’t mind features H4 is lacking. If I want to play Firefight, I go to ODST or Reach. If I want to play competitive MP, I choose H3. If I want to play some crazy custom games with my friends or quests, I choose between all Halo games I have (excluding ODST, of course). In other words, I play what I want to play.
> >
> > Or maybe there’s something wrong about me…
>
> Nothing is wrong with liking what you like. Don’t let anyone else tell you that.

Good to see someone else like this on the forums.

YES!

But 343 still needs to learn but i dont take them responsible for it

I like Halo 4, but it still needs some improvements…

> I like Halo 4, but it still needs some improvements…

“Hear, hear!”

Wow, I must say I’m pretty shocked at how many people on this forum don’t actually like the game! Pretty disappointing to see :frowning:

I voted ‘Yes’ by the way!

> Wow, I must say I’m pretty shocked at how many people on this forum don’t actually like the game! Pretty disappointing to see :frowning:
>
> I voted ‘Yes’ by the way!

Keep in mind part of the reason why people don’t like the game is because they loved Halo, 2, or 3 and because this game is different than them they don’t like it because of that reason. Paradox? Yes, but there are people who will pay full price for a game that is just updated graphics and new maps on top of old code.

> > > Yep, I like H4. There are few problems with it, but who cares?
> >
> > I cares. This game was the first Halo game that was a true disappointment to me.
> >
> > Like I’ve been saying, Halo 4 lacks more features from previous games than it’s gained. That is a huge problem for a sequel, and one of the main reasons why it isn’t being successful.
>
> Maybe I’m enjoying Halo 4 just because I only played Halo 3, ODST and Reach… I don’t mind features H4 is lacking. If I want to play Firefight, I go to ODST or Reach. If I want to play competitive MP, I choose H3. If I want to play some crazy custom games with my friends or quests, I choose between all Halo games I have (excluding ODST, of course). In other words, I play what I want to play.
>
> Or maybe there’s something wrong about me…

My problem is that Halo 4 should’ve been the culmination of over a decades worth of work. It wasn’t, we have to go between Halo games to play the things we like, it shouldn’t be like this.

All Halo 4 offered was a decent campaign and 3 new gamemodes, while excluding the features from past games forcing us to keep going back. I wouldn’t mind going back for nostalgia, but when I have to go back to enjoy the gametypes and features I liked that’s a problem.

A sequel is supposed to build off of it’s predecessors, Halo 4 failed at that.

A simple NO from me.

Yes, it’s an enjoyable game. If someone doesn’t likes it, I respect his/her opinion, the problem is that most (notice that I say most, not all) of the people who “don’t enjoy it” lack of a real argument. In fact, most of them just lost a match because someone got an ordnance, and immediately post in here “OMG THIS GAME IS SO BROKEN, REAL HALO FANS WOULDN’T PLAY IT”.

Ironically, they will continue to play it. I’m dead serious, some guy told me last month that he didn’t play as much as he did the previous titles, and he played on a daily basis. Can’t think of how much time he spent on the original trilogy if he didn’t “play as much as he did in the past”.

> > > > Yep, I like H4. There are few problems with it, but who cares?
> > >
> > > I cares. This game was the first Halo game that was a true disappointment to me.
> > >
> > > Like I’ve been saying, Halo 4 lacks more features from previous games than it’s gained. That is a huge problem for a sequel, and one of the main reasons why it isn’t being successful.
> >
> > Maybe I’m enjoying Halo 4 just because I only played Halo 3, ODST and Reach… I don’t mind features H4 is lacking. If I want to play Firefight, I go to ODST or Reach. If I want to play competitive MP, I choose H3. If I want to play some crazy custom games with my friends or quests, I choose between all Halo games I have (excluding ODST, of course). In other words, I play what I want to play.
> >
> > Or maybe there’s something wrong about me…
>
> My problem is that Halo 4 should’ve been the culmination of over a decades worth of work. It wasn’t, we have to go between Halo games to play the things we like, it shouldn’t be like this.
>
> All Halo 4 offered was a decent campaign and 3 new gamemodes, while excluding the features from past games forcing us to keep going back. I wouldn’t mind going back for nostalgia, but when I have to go back to enjoy the gametypes and features I liked that’s a problem.
>
> A sequel is supposed to build off of it’s predecessors, Halo 4 failed at that.

Though I accept your opinion, there are few things I don’t agree with.

I don’t know if H4 should be the culmination of all the work Bungie did with Halo so far, but as long it isn’t the final part of Halo series, I don’t think it should be the culmination of everything we saw so far in this beloved video game saga.

As far I seen, Halo games have always been about big amount of content. Halo 4 stands up to the tradition of it’s predecessors: we got 6-10 hours long campaign, multiplayer mode (for the first time with back-story!), episodic Spartan Ops (which is even longer than ODST, and free), custom game options (not as advanced as in previous titles, but still) and forge mode, which is basically a map and game mode editor. Yep, I know a lot of stuff have been left behind, but we still got a lot of content, which is very nice nowadays, when a lot of games are just ones we can beat in less than 5 hours and then never play them again.

And finally, there isn’t a holy rule, that defines, how good sequel should look like, my friend :slight_smile:

I hope you’ll accept my opinion, because I did that with yours.