Do you find the camo variants useless?

With so many variations being just astetic wouldn’t you prefer that vehicles that look different play different? I’ve been wanting a long time consist mehanics with specific sets. They nailed it with Hannibal, but what about the liamkang? Also one variation we need to see FLAMETHROWER I.e. hog mantis, even mongooses.

What other ideas of variants do you the community have

Flamethrower variant would be epic could be introduced with a weapon also. I really badly want a gun goose that is guns not little grenades

Flamethrower would be the trump card if they introduced flood to wz…imagine the possibilities

A falcon or a hornet would be sick

I would definitely expect the unsc to have been more proactive against the flood, its like the flood was less a threat than the covenant

Not sure this is where you wanted to go with this post, but I do wish the existing variants had different driving characteristics, e.g. Tundra would handle better in the snow. But they all handle the same…

I think invisibility that varied in how it operated would be nice like one that from a distance works better but is more blury at close range

Most of them are the same. The Urban, Tundra, and Woodland are all the same.

Misrah Armories and Acheron Securities variants would be cool. Misrah’s doesn’t overheat and Acheron’s is more accurate or something.

> 2533274907200114;10:
> Misrah Armories and Acheron Securities variants would be cool. Misrah’s doesn’t overheat and Acheron’s is more accurate or something.

That’s the kind of thing I’m getting at

I want a Hannibal Gungoose.

I never would have thought that tan would look that good with blue and black.

> 2533274973957410;13:
> I never would have thought that tan would look that good with blue and black.

Yeah it’s slick

A.mongoose that when rams a enemy vehicle unleashes a emp blast