> This ending of Halo3 was just AWESOME i don’t know why, was so poetic and perfect,“The end of the fight” when i saw the 117 written in the monument I knew that the Master Chief’s sacrifice was not in vain and her legacy wont be forgotten,but he lived and we have Halo 4 and Halo 5 about to coming,but I’ll never forget that Halo 3 was the really “End of the fight”.
What do you think about this?
We don’t “need” much of anything in regards to entertainment. Do I want additional games? Of course, I’m a huge Halo fan and I like seeing the franchise grow In lore.
To your quote I will say that it is generally agreed upon throughout the Halo lore community that Halo 3 didn’t end the fight at all. Flood were still out there, we got no information on what the rest of the elites and brutes left in the galaxy were doing, and even bigger we still didn’t know about the rest of the Halos which are still out there and could still potentially be fired on their own.
As to the topic of your thread technically we don’t need any of these games. In fact we don’t need any of the Halo games to live our lives. On the other hand we all want more games and the series shouldn’t just stop because you end one story arc.
In my opinion if you create a great universe and only make a couple games/books/movies/whatever and then decide you’re done with it then you are wasting it. Kind of like how George Lucas didn’t make another trilogy after the prequels were released because he considered the story done. If you create a universe as large as Star Wars or in this case Halo the story is never done.
This is so stupid that I don’t even know what angle to address it on, so I won’t. I’ll just say, we want the games for more than just the story, and even if that weren’t the case, if you find an ending where a character is literally saying “my story will commence later” and then paning to a completely new place and then cutting off, you are just wrong, it was written in a way where it could’ve ended there, but you can’t deny the legendary ending was a cliffhanger, and considering the story was always written ahead of time, which is why there was requiem in halo 3, even the writers at bungies knew the story was going to continue. The 343 games are a different creation by different artists, but it is the same series. “Do we even need more games?” jebus cringle crackle…
Halo 3 did not “finish the fight”. We defeated Truth’s Covenant and the Delta Halo outbreak. But it opened so many more doors than it closed.
The Covenant was split, and conflict is inevitably going to rise again. The terminals introduced surviving Forerunners. The terminals introduced Mendicant Bias, and confirmed that he manipulated the Portal to send Chief to his masters, Forerunners. The legendary ending practically being a neon sign saying that the story isn’t over. The Gravemind outright said that defeat here would not be his end.
> 2533274907934539;5:
> Halo 3 did not “finish the fight”. We defeated Truth’s Covenant and the Delta Halo outbreak. But it opened so many more doors than it closed.
>
> The Covenant was split, and conflict is inevitably going to rise again. The terminals introduced surviving Forerunners. The terminals introduced Mendicant Bias, and confirmed that he manipulated the Portal to send Chief to his masters, Forerunners. The legendary ending practically being a neon sign saying that the story isn’t over. The Gravemind outright said that defeat here would not be his end.
No way man, Luke destroyed all of the empire in episode 6, do we even need more Starwars movies?
> 2533274894863132;6:
> > 2533274907934539;5:
> > Halo 3 did not “finish the fight”. We defeated Truth’s Covenant and the Delta Halo outbreak. But it opened so many more doors than it closed.
> >
> > The Covenant was split, and conflict is inevitably going to rise again. The terminals introduced surviving Forerunners. The terminals introduced Mendicant Bias, and confirmed that he manipulated the Portal to send Chief to his masters, Forerunners. The legendary ending practically being a neon sign saying that the story isn’t over. The Gravemind outright said that defeat here would not be his end.
>
>
> No way man, Luke destroyed all of the empire in episode 6, do we even need more Starwars movies?
Silly kid is silly. Luke ended the emporers rein. That’s it.
> 2533274833380875;3:
> To your quote I will say that it is generally agreed upon throughout the Halo lore community that Halo 3 didn’t end the fight at all. Flood were still out there, we got no information on what the rest of the elites and brutes left in the galaxy were doing, and even bigger we still didn’t know about the rest of the Halos which are still out there and could still potentially be fired on their own.
>
> As to the topic of your thread technically we don’t need any of these games. In fact we don’t need any of the Halo games to live our lives. On the other hand we all want more games and the series shouldn’t just stop because you end one story arc.
>
> In my opinion if you create a great universe and only make a couple games/books/movies/whatever and then decide you’re done with it then you are wasting it. Kind of like how George Lucas didn’t make another trilogy after the prequels were released because he considered the story done. If you create a universe as large as Star Wars or in this case Halo the story is never done.
Definitely agree with this. When you make such a large or able-universe and so many fans, it’s gunna go somewhere. I thought it was funny with the 2nd trilogy when all the old people we’re freaking out about the originals, saying “it shouldn’t have gone anywhere.” Or finished/stopped then.
Hmm…weird how we’re hearing the same thing now with Halo and the Reclaimer Saga compared to the original trilogy. Just find it kind of ironic I suppose. I guess people will always be nostalgic to originals of any franchise. I do like the first 2 WW Xpacs the most compared to the newer ones, but that’s getting off topic.
Edited grammar…
> 2533274887515153;7:
> > 2533274894863132;6:
> > > 2533274907934539;5:
> > > Halo 3 did not “finish the fight”. We defeated Truth’s Covenant and the Delta Halo outbreak. But it opened so many more doors than it closed.
> > >
> > > The Covenant was split, and conflict is inevitably going to rise again. The terminals introduced surviving Forerunners. The terminals introduced Mendicant Bias, and confirmed that he manipulated the Portal to send Chief to his masters, Forerunners. The legendary ending practically being a neon sign saying that the story isn’t over. The Gravemind outright said that defeat here would not be his end.
> >
> >
> > No way man, Luke destroyed all of the empire in episode 6, do we even need more Starwars movies?
>
>
> Silly kid is silly. Luke ended the emporers rein. That’s it.
That was the joke… it’s the same stupid argument from both fanbases.
There’s never needed to be more games. There never needed to be Halo 1 in the first place. The universe would have kept on turning just fine. So that’s the wrong question to ask. The right question is “Could more Halo games be cool?”, and the answer to that is “Yes.”
The fight was never truly finished. If you think it was then maybe you should go watch the legendary ending.
All the things that all of you say,could be finished by others in novels,comics etc but my point is that the Master Chief could finish his job in Halo 3,in other words,Master Chief must have died in Halo 3.
> 2533274848967598;12:
> All the things that all of you say,could be finished by others in novels,comics etc but my point is that the Master Chief could finish his job in Halo 3,in other words,Master Chief must have died in Halo 3.
What are you even talking about? almost everyone here explained how halo 3 ended on a cliffhanger. Also, why would we just continue with novels only? As we’ve pointed out, halo is more than story. You said you read what we wrote but everything you said had already been explained multiplayer times.
Considering Halo is a huge franchise it would be foolish to just stop.