do u believe it is acceptable to quit if...

do u believe it is acceptable to quit a game if the hosts connection makes it seem like they live in a third world country? i get super tired of foriegn hosts ruining my experience. Im not trying to even remotely sound rasict or discriminatory, i just dont think a person should be punished for leaving a game that might end up booting the majority of the players anyways. so i see multiple red bar lag, i wait a few minutes while camping like its CoD. if it gets better i stay, if it gets worse, see ya! do u believe people should be punished for leaving a crappy, not very fun, game of matchmaking?

also, i was in a game just today where a dude with a gt i couldnt even read had the best connection out of all. 3 minutes in, half the game splits off, likely disconnected due to severe lag -.-

seriously? 34 views and no one has anything to say on this subject?

> seriously? 34 views and no one has anything to say on this subject?

They probably didn’t want to post anything.

Anyway, it should be perfectly acceptable to allow players to quit from a match, if they have red bar connection. It’s just plain annoying to play match like that. It should also be acceptable to quit from a match, where almost every one in your team has left.

I would say it is. If the game is not functioning properly why should you be forced to endure that? I imagine that is why you are not penalized for quitting every so often.

> I would say it is. If the game is not functioning properly why should you be forced to endure that? I imagine that is why you are not penalized for quitting every so often.

well im a rager at heart. if a game just goes completely downhill, i will quit and accept the fact that there are other ways to spend ten minutes, such as Pac-Man’s ten minute time trial lol if even ONE person has lag the game is ruined for me. Typically because that one person tends to find me either very early on. or way later when i have a shot at winning.