Did the Warzone Reveal video seem clunky / off?

It seemed like the graphics and visual effects were clunky and slippery (just like Halo 4)…

Did anyone else get this from the WarZone video?

The Spartan moving across the screen at 21 seconds.
The walking robot thing (forgot the name) moving along at 32 seconds.
The Warthog crash at 45 seconds seemed cheesy and clunky.

Just a couple findings, I think the idea is great but compared to other graphic engines and reveals we have seen at E3- I think H5 looks about average…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=50&v=av-N5smXFpw

Compare it to the E3 reveal of the StarWars battlefront (pre-alpha footage) - Looked Amazing

Thoughts, Ideas, likes, dislikes?

I think they originally have planned to put the Vidoc video instead but it causes over time so they showed the Trailer version instead which sucks for 343

The difference is that one (Halo 5) has footage from actual multiplayer matches while Battlefront has a multiplayer match that is completely staged and scripted.

Personally the obsession with graphics on games like Fallout 4 and now Halo 5 are things we just shouldn’t worry about anymore. All of the videos look great, just watch them at 1080p.

> 2533274881042784;2:
> I think they originally have planned to put the Vidoc video instead but it causes over time so they showed the Trailer version instead which sucks for 343

My thoughts too. If they showed the ViDoc in the E3 presentation it would have been WAY better. I was so confused at what I saw first time. Now I think the game looks like a lot of fun after watching some full games

> 2533274833380875;3:
> The difference is that one (Halo 5) has footage from actual multiplayer matches while Battlefront has a multiplayer match that is completely staged and scripted.

And how do you know 343 didn’t script that? Have you seen other videos? Like the release of the H4 campaign? Same -Yoink-…

Regardless even if what you say is true, the movement, graphics, explosions, weapons, lighting, etc were much better looking in SWB2 than in H5.

And again, nobody addressed the clunkiness of the character movement - I smell H4 all over again.

> 2533274881042784;2:
> I think they originally have planned to put the Vidoc video instead but it causes over time so they showed the Trailer version instead which sucks for 343

I agree

Well, if we’re really comparing footage to Battlefront, at least Halo 5’s Warzone looks unique and fun rather than just a Battlefield clone. I had extremely high hopes for the new Battlefront, but I’m left being nothing but disappointed. This is not the Battlefront game I was expecting.

Regarding the mantis at 32 seconds, it seems to me that the player was simply trying to walk into a wall that he could not climb. The same thing happens when a player walks into a wall, the walking animation still happens.

The Warthog at 45 seconds seemed perfectly fine to me. What made it appear to be “cheesy” to you?

Remember though, this is footage that is most likely several months old at this point, and definitely pre-release. We can’t expect it to be flawless. If this was final footage that was shown in October? Then I’d have concerns. But I doubt we have anything to worry about.