Did bungie want this?

Okay, so i know that many of us wonder what it would be like if if bungies cord didnt snap and fell and completed its destiny.
Im thinking bungie planned to make most of these decisions that 343 made. There are some similarities between h5 and destiny after all. Probably because 343 was copying them though(i think they took it the wrong way when we said learn from bungie)
But im sure most of us remember the legendary ending in h3. The master chief heading towards requiem. Plus reach was an innovative halo game, certainly different, so it was only a matter of time until these abilities were added. There was also reach, the buck firefight voice description said if he were any better he’d be a spartan. Now you could say thats just a description thing, what ever. But bungie has made a history with hinting towards future games. Halo in marathon, destiny in odst, and im sure we all so reach coming as it was mentioned in every game before it besides halo wars.
Let me know if you guys find any more aboit this. Yes it probably would be different with bungie, meaning halo 4 would be a lot better, but im pretty sure 343 is following a simular path that bungie was heading towards.

maybe its defiantly possible

I wish we could find out what Halo would be if Bungie would still make it.

Something tells me we would be look toward more of a battlefield-style game than a COD-arena shooter. Reach was the pinnacle of vehicle and gun physics, and that wonderful Asymmetrical map design that makes me feel like I am fighting in the Halo universe instead of some “simulation”

> 2533274989165227;3:
> I wish we could find out what Halo would be if Bungie would still make it.

Still follows the story.

> 2533274989165227;3:
> I wish we could find out what Halo would be if Bungie would still make it.

To be fair after Destiny I’m kind of glad we didn’t.

The story would be better probably (not) (look at destiny)

I don’t think Destiny really qualifies as evidence for anything. Destiny is a new IP, they’re free to do whatever they want with it, and thus they did. There’s no real reason to say that a new Halo game would’ve ended up like Destiny.

When Bungie finally got around to adding sprint they added it as an interchangeable armor ability, then made all those abilities really easy to disable in custom games, and even added support for placing them on the map as a pickup item. Clearly their intention was to let people play how they want and not force these new gimmicks on all of us, while we had to beg just to get a sprint toggle, and we only received it in Halo 5.

> 2533274819302824;8:
> I don’t think Destiny really qualifies as evidence for anything. Destiny is a new IP, they’re free to do whatever they want with it, and thus they did. There’s no real reason to say that a new Halo game would’ve ended up like Destiny.
>
> When Bungie finally got around to adding sprint they added it as an interchangeable armor ability, then made all those abilities really easy to disable in custom games, and even added support for placing them on the map as a pickup item. Clearly their intention was to let people play how they want and not force these new gimmicks on all of us, while we had to beg just to get a sprint toggle, and we only received it in Halo 5.

You can dissable abilities in custom games. I did it.