To whom it may concern,
It is in my opinion that the Halo 4 mechanics and template should be based off of the original three halo’s. I believe this as, considering it is continuing off master cheifs legacy, it would only make sense to continue master chief’s gameplay. Secondly, while i am aware that halo reach was supposed to feel different, as bungie wanted it to feel different because you did not play as the invincible master chief, it felt much to different. This, as you may know, has caused a large outcry among the halo community. Likewise, i believe it should look like halo. Halo reach did not succeed in this, as it looked rather alienated from the way the original halos looked. Once again this caused and outcry among the halo community.
If you want halo 4 to be successful, you have to make it feel as though it is halo. Basing it off of, or updating, halo 3 would be a good start off point as the base template. Another way to make halo 4 succesful would be interesting map layout and designs. NOTHING, should look the same. This was, once again, a major fault point in halo reach. The textures all looked and felt the same.
My last cry for Halo 4, is that you cannot make it confined. Why was halo 2 so successful? You could go anywhere and do anything. You werent held by boundries ten feet above you head like you are in reach. Reach had boundries that blocked you off of ledges two feet above your head, and you would die simply bye standing there for ten seconds. What did bungie do in halo 2? In stead of death barriars, they gave you swords, names, soccerballs and scarab guns. This is the kind of thing i would like to see in halo 4. Please, do not sitfle the inginuity of gameplay. You can set boundries in multiplayer all you want, but leave the campaign open for exploration.
This is what i want to see in halo 4.
Sincerely;
SilentA98
SilentA98
I agree but you signed it twice 
Oh and welcome to the forum 
Wow, that, was really worth the read, there wasn’t a lot of Reach bashing, or a lot of “Halo 4 should be like Halo 3” and you clearly stated that you wanted Halo 4 to be like Halo as a whole.
Also I do want to point out that Reach as a game wasn’t what the community liked, but the Engine it’s self is fine.
The engine was fine, heck the engine was great! Im just not sure it felt enough like halo.
A good constructive post. I agree completely.
What’s this? A post that’s actually constructive?
You sir deserve a medal.
This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not post spam.
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
> To whom it may concern,Sincerely;
>
> SilentA98
>
> SilentA98
This is a forum, not a lakeside. We don’t need the reflections.
> The engine was fine, heck the engine was great! Im just not sure it felt enough like halo.
The engine does not define how the game will play or feel. I can make a fighting game, racing game, party game, or stealth game with the Reach engine.
>
I have see recent posts stated by you, and have decided you have nothing constructive to say. You have yet to prove me otherwise and mainly argue against any OP tha has been given.
I was typing in business letter format, hence the double signature.
Good day,
Silent
The reason Reach failed was because it took Halo into a new radical direction.
That won’t be the case with Halo 4 (I hope).
>
You remind me so much of me, I would always burn people through inteligence, not random, sexual jokes.
This is a becoming of a new friendship.
lolandHALO4.
OT- Yes I agree with many or your points. One thing that kind of bothered me is the tidbit where you think we should base Halo 4 on Halo 1, 2, 3. Although a lot of people would agree, I think it should be based 89% on Halo 2.
Oh! Nice constructive post, don’t see much of those these days.
I couldn’t agree more with the original post. Good work.
This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not flame or attack other members.
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
> You remind me so much of me, I would always burn people through inteligence, not random, sexual jokes.
It seems the only thing burning in this thread is your arrogance.
>
My “internet rage” senses are tingling…
>
As i stated in my previous reply, i have monitered your posts before. You never have anything constructive to say, and your posts are merely surrounded in a sphere of ignorance. Please refrain from commenting on this post.
Do not let it happen agian,
Silent
> > > You remind me so much of me, I would always burn people through inteligence, not random, sexual jokes.
> >
> > It seems the only thing burning in this thread is your arrogance.
>
> My “internet rage” senses are tingling…
I call it “The Flamsuit Alarm”.
This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not flame or attack other members.
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
> > > You remind me so much of me, I would always burn people through inteligence, not random, sexual jokes.
> >
> > It seems the only thing burning in this thread is your arrogance.
>
> As i stated in my previous reply, i have monitered your posts before. You never have anything constructive to say, and your posts are merely surrounded in a sphere of ignorance. Please refrain from commenting on this post.
>
> Do not let it happen agian,
> Silent
Dont worry, he’s a troll. He sits on here all day and bashes people who want the original Halo game play back. His name suits him very well, LOLZ.
>
Lol, thats exactly what i thought the first couple of his posts i saw.
This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not post spam.
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
Sorry guys, but I’m gonna have to report you all. Personal attacks on other members are not tolerated. And yes, there is something incredibly arrogant saying that you “burn through other people with intelligence”.