In the epic ending of the E3 video right before or after the elephant appeared there was a scene where master chief was standing in front of a cyclops in what appeared to be a hanger bay.
The cyclops will be in the campaign in some shape or form… Why would 343i show it during the video if they weren’t hinting for it to be drivable?
I’m not saying the cyclops on Warhouse will be drivable… The cyclops has been confirmed to not be in multiplayer. However I
Think theres a chance we may be able to control it at some point in the campaign.
A spartan…driving a Mjolnir…driving a cyclop
it’s like the -Yoink- Guyver Gigantic
That wasn’t a Cyclops, it was another kind of mech.
> That wasn’t a Cyclops, it was another kind of mech.
No, it is a Cyclops. Compare this image with the fifth image here. You can tell that they are the same vehicle.
And I am willing to bet that it is indeed drivable, I mean, they wouldn’t show John standing in front of it like that if it wasn’t, right?
no it was not a cyclops thats in the multiplayer map warhouse and frankie already comfirmed you cannot pilot a cyclops
> > That wasn’t a Cyclops, it was another kind of mech.
>
> No, it is a Cyclops. Compare this image with the fifth image here. You can tell that they are the same vehicle.
>
> And I am willing to bet that it is indeed drivable, I mean, they wouldn’t show John standing in front of it like that if it wasn’t, right?
The two look very little alike. I urge you to compare them again, but look closely this time. If you would like i could point out all the differences. I can see how at first glance they could appear very similar, but there are a large number of differences.
> > That wasn’t a Cyclops, it was another kind of mech.
>
> No, it is a Cyclops. Compare this image with the fifth image here. You can tell that they are the same vehicle.
>
> And I am willing to bet that it is indeed drivable, I mean, they wouldn’t show John standing in front of it like that if it wasn’t, right?
think frankie said we will be able drive bigger things in campaign.
> > That wasn’t a Cyclops, it was another kind of mech.
>
> No, it is a Cyclops. Compare this image with the fifth image here. You can tell that they are the same vehicle.
>
> And I am willing to bet that it is indeed drivable, I mean, they wouldn’t show John standing in front of it like that if it wasn’t, right?
Lol, not even close to the same thing.
Actually neither of them really look like a Cyclops. At least in the fact they both have built-in guns and the cockpits look different.
I still think it’s in the MM.
> Actually neither of them really look like a Cyclops. At least in the fact they both have built-in guns and the cockpits look different.
It’s a Cyclops Mk.II, so it’s been upgraded a lot from the previous version.
> > > That wasn’t a Cyclops, it was another kind of mech.
> >
> > No, it is a Cyclops. Compare this image with the fifth image here. You can tell that they are the same vehicle.
> >
> > And I am willing to bet that it is indeed drivable, I mean, they wouldn’t show John standing in front of it like that if it wasn’t, right?
>
> The two look very little alike. I urge you to compare them again, but look closely this time. If you would like i could point out all the differences. I can see how at first glance they could appear very similar, but there are a large number of differences.
There are different, yes, but keep in mind that the one on Warhouse is being built, therefore does not have all the components yet. It’s like when you’re building a car, a half-assembled one won’t look like one that’s completely finished, even though it’s the same thing.
> > > > That wasn’t a Cyclops, it was another kind of mech.
> > >
> > > No, it is a Cyclops. Compare this image with the fifth image here. You can tell that they are the same vehicle.
> > >
> > > And I am willing to bet that it is indeed drivable, I mean, they wouldn’t show John standing in front of it like that if it wasn’t, right?
> >
> > The two look very little alike. I urge you to compare them again, but look closely this time. If you would like i could point out all the differences. I can see how at first glance they could appear very similar, but there are a large number of differences.
>
> There are different, yes, but keep in mind that the one on Warhouse is being built, therefore does not have all the components yet. It’s like when you’re building a car, a half-assembled one won’t look like one that’s completely finished, even though it’s the same thing.
If the one on Warhouse is not complete, then why is the Cyclops that has even less on it being put into use? The differences go beyond just stuff that has yet to be added to either one, it’s too different to be the same vehicle. The cockpit isn’t even in the same place.
> > > > > That wasn’t a Cyclops, it was another kind of mech.
> > > >
> > > > No, it is a Cyclops. Compare this image with the fifth image here. You can tell that they are the same vehicle.
> > > >
> > > > And I am willing to bet that it is indeed drivable, I mean, they wouldn’t show John standing in front of it like that if it wasn’t, right?
> > >
> > > The two look very little alike. I urge you to compare them again, but look closely this time. If you would like i could point out all the differences. I can see how at first glance they could appear very similar, but there are a large number of differences.
> >
> > There are different, yes, but keep in mind that the one on Warhouse is being built, therefore does not have all the components yet. It’s like when you’re building a car, a half-assembled one won’t look like one that’s completely finished, even though it’s the same thing.
>
> If the one on Warhouse is not complete, then why is the Cyclops that has even less on it being put into use? The differences go beyond just stuff that has yet to be added to either one, it’s too different to be the same vehicle. The cockpit isn’t even in the same place.
Hmm, yeah, you’re right. Now that I look at it more closely, I see your points. I was wrong then, my bad!
> > > > > > That wasn’t a Cyclops, it was another kind of mech.
> > > > >
> > > > > No, it is a Cyclops. Compare this image with the fifth image here. You can tell that they are the same vehicle.
> > > > >
> > > > > And I am willing to bet that it is indeed drivable, I mean, they wouldn’t show John standing in front of it like that if it wasn’t, right?
> > > >
> > > > The two look very little alike. I urge you to compare them again, but look closely this time. If you would like i could point out all the differences. I can see how at first glance they could appear very similar, but there are a large number of differences.
> > >
> > > There are different, yes, but keep in mind that the one on Warhouse is being built, therefore does not have all the components yet. It’s like when you’re building a car, a half-assembled one won’t look like one that’s completely finished, even though it’s the same thing.
> >
> > If the one on Warhouse is not complete, then why is the Cyclops that has even less on it being put into use? The differences go beyond just stuff that has yet to be added to either one, it’s too different to be the same vehicle. The cockpit isn’t even in the same place.
>
> Hmm, yeah, you’re right. Now that I look at it more closely, I see your points. I was wrong then, my bad!
Haha, no worries! I honestly wish it was a Cyclops, but maybe this new mech will be just as fun to use as the Cyclops would be.
