What’s the constructive purpose of entertaining the haters. Can the forum itself vote to ban a (im)poster?
“Seeing people have opinions which differ from my own fills me with impotent rage and a compulsion to defend the multi-billion dollar corporation that ‘haters’ dare slight!”
-EAGLEKEEPER8185, October 28th, 2015
Poor interpretation of my intent but you are entitled to yours. BTW where does the monetary value of a content producer relate?
Can we ban the people who are non-constructively supporting 343i/opposing the constructive criticism too? You know, the people who say “Man you guys complain about everything” or “game is good you suck” when faced with valid and/or constructive arguments.
If not, then no. Equal treatment for all, folks.
Point well taken, I accept judgement. That’s what I get for posting in frustration! The market will choose the winner.
Believe me, I understand the frustration. Not a whole lot we can do about it though 
> 2533274908238201;4:
> Can we ban the people who are non-constructively supporting 343i/opposing the constructive criticism too? You know, the people who say “Man you guys complain about everything” or “game is good you suck” when faced with valid and/or constructive arguments.
>
> If not, then no. Equal treatment for all, folks.
Both sides have points. Whether they are valid or not is certainly the whole point of the debate. Most arguments are invalid, few are constructive. There have only been a few valid arguments.
I agree with the OP in situations where it is clearly trolling or needless pandering to the ‘haters’.
I do not agree for all criticisms of the game. Everyone will have a criticism here and there.
Constructive critics are meant to improve, hate critics are meant for destruction. Please if you don´t like the game or you think that samething should be changed, express it in a good and passive way so 343i reads it.
Agreed, maybe more players need to learn there is a specific support forum. I know the core users do.
Some just like to QQ.