Note:
WA: Stands for Warzone Assault
W: Stands for Warzone
So after playing many hours of war zone assault, it is well known that the entrance of bases are hotspots for grenades. So I was just wondering what the community thinks about this through a poll. These hotspots are easily avoidable of course, I’m not complaining, but I think reducing grenades for WA will promote more gunplay.
The maps are quite large and open so nades aren’t really a problem most of the time, grenades are a good way to flush out hiding enemies inside the bases.
The nade spam is real with this game.
The Grenades of Halo 2 were something… Those were the days, those were the days.
I always throw a grenade or two into doorways or windows I KNOW (see; would use for similar purpose) people would be in. Also since they aren’t that hard to get away from, I’ve had no problem with them.
> 2533274925159248;2:
> The maps are quite large and open so nades aren’t really a problem most of the time, grenades are a good way to flush out hiding enemies inside the bases.
This right here. Grenades are fine in Warzone.
Unless you are standing against the far wall, the grenades are just for suppression, really. About one in every twenty (not exaggerating) actually kills someone.
It’ll be more of a problem when folks have the req for splinter nades or plasmas, then, then it’ll be super lame to have zone just covered in splinters lol.
I think for war zone assault the spamming is ridiculous mostly acting like a flash bomb that is never ending
I reckon spawn with one grenade but you can carry 2 if you pick them up
I found grenades rarely kill anyone, they’re more for crowd control
Grenade spam is real in this but everyone has them so I’m not even going to complain about it.