There is evidence (clear for all to see right on this forum!) that someone on this forum cheated/hacked/tampered to unlock certain things.
I know, I’m being vague.
I’m pretty sure you are not allowed to name people on the forum so I’m just going to ask can someone point me in the right direction so I can nail this sneaky Unicorn to the wall?
Anyone can see that he has been tampering!
you can state a better case without being so vague. no name dropping but you can explain the evidence. accusers can’t just accuse, you have to state your case and we, the jury, will submit a verdict.
Name not included, what exactly are you accusing this person of?
> you can state a better case without being so vague. no name dropping but you can explain the evidence. accusers can’t just accuse, you have to state your case and we, the jury, will submit a verdict.
Very well. The clearest piece of primary evidence is that his spartan displays the “Breach” stance despite the fact that he has not completed the required commendation, nor is he anywhere near completing it (his stats show this).
I think that is the simplest and most solid piece of evidence that I could give you. I could PM you pieces of secondary evidence that I have gathered from his posts during the last week. I won’t post them here however as it would require me to reference certain threads and therefore I would be likely to accidentally reveal the person. Also, these other secondary pieces of evidence are not as straightforward as A=B, but rather they give a lot of weight to the arguement that he has somehow tampered with the game to unlock certain things. The evidence I gave above (the Breach stance) is straightforward and surely solid proof?
I am open to suggestions that I am wrong.
Waypoint is incredibly buggy for some people (like me), so on that issue there is at least a possible explanation.
if hes not using auto aim or some other -Yoink- then who gives a -Yoink-?
oh noes he didnt earn that dress for his barbie!!! er i mean spartan
> > you can state a better case without being so vague. no name dropping but you can explain the evidence. accusers can’t just accuse, you have to state your case and we, the jury, will submit a verdict.
>
> Very well. The clearest piece of primary evidence is that his spartan displays the “Breach” stance despite the fact that he has not completed the required commendation, nor is he anywhere near completing it (his stats show this).
>
> I think that is the simplest and most solid piece of evidence that I could give you. I could PM you pieces of secondary evidence that I have gathered from his posts during the last week. I won’t post them here however as it would require me to reference certain threads and therefore I would be likely to accidentally reveal the person. Also, these other secondary pieces of evidence are not as straightforward as A=B, but rather they give a lot of weight to the arguement that he has somehow tampered with the game to unlock certain things. The evidence I gave above (the Breach stance) is straightforward and surely solid proof?
>
> I am open to suggestions that I am wrong.
ok, i understand the need to not reveal other things in attempts to keep the defendants name private. As for the “Breach” stance in question. it may appear he hacked to get the “Breach” stance. Seeing as how the “Breach” stance is cosmedic and not in-game effective I have no other ruling but the following:
I, Dawued, as district judge 117 onboard USNS Infinity duely render the verdict as “dismissed”. The said “breach” stance is not game breaking nor does it allow for any advantage to the defendant during War Games. Suspect in “breach” unlock is not enough to label said defendant as “hacker”. until further tampering can be revealed whilst keeping the integrity of the defendant private this case is now closed and the court is in recess. (gavel pound)
> Waypoint is incredibly buggy for some people (like me), so on that issue there is at least a possible explanation.
True, and I am open to the potential for a bug/mistake on the site.
The interesting thing is that the post which alerted myself and others to the possibility was in a thread that was specifically about the Breach stance. It just seems too perfect. However, like I said, I am willing to accept that I am wrong and that it was a bug of some sort.
If it was anybody else, I wouldn’t have noticed. But I have had my suspicions about this person in the past…
> if hes not using auto aim or some other Yoink! then who gives a Yoink!?
>
> oh noes he didnt earn that dress for his barbie!!! er i mean spartan
Cheating is cheating, there should be no exceptions nor any mercy.
> if hes not using auto aim or some other Yoink! then who gives a Yoink!?
>
> oh noes he didnt earn that dress for his barbie!!! er i mean spartan
Indeed.
The reason I am posting is because this specific person went ballistic over an obvious hacker (also for cosmetic stuff), sending his details to bs angel in an effort to get him banned
Therefore, it’s the hypocrisy that is grating me.
> > you can state a better case without being so vague. no name dropping but you can explain the evidence. accusers can’t just accuse, you have to state your case and we, the jury, will submit a verdict.
>
> Very well. The clearest piece of primary evidence is that his spartan displays the “Breach” stance despite the fact that he has not completed the required commendation, nor is he anywhere near completing it (his stats show this).
>
> I think that is the simplest and most solid piece of evidence that I could give you. I could PM you pieces of secondary evidence that I have gathered from his posts during the last week. I won’t post them here however as it would require me to reference certain threads and therefore I would be likely to accidentally reveal the person. Also, these other secondary pieces of evidence are not as straightforward as A=B, but rather they give a lot of weight to the arguement that he has somehow tampered with the game to unlock certain things. The evidence I gave above (the Breach stance) is straightforward and surely solid proof?
>
> I am open to suggestions that I am wrong.
Considering some people have been having problems with stats not being recorded your “evidence” could just be the game not registering his commendations.
> > if hes not using auto aim or some other Yoink! then who gives a Yoink!?
> >
> > oh noes he didnt earn that dress for his barbie!!! er i mean spartan
>
> Cheating is cheating, there should be no exceptions nor any mercy.
Very well said!
> > Waypoint is incredibly buggy for some people (like me), so on that issue there is at least a possible explanation.
>
> True, and I am open to the potential for a bug/mistake on the site.
>
> The interesting thing is that the post which alerted myself and others to the possibility was in a thread that was specifically about the Breach stance. It just seems too perfect. However, like I said, I am willing to accept that I am wrong and that it was a bug of some sort.
>
> If it was anybody else, I wouldn’t have noticed. But I have had my suspicions about this person in the past…
I know exactly which post and who you are talking about. I thought it was very strange also. I just went back to the post to read it again and now two more of the people have the breach stance with full commendations when they didn’t have them before posting in that thread. Everything about it is weird. Oh well, it doesn’t affect me what so ever. Even though cheating is lame and they should be punished!